Why educate “little scientists?” Examining the potential of practice‐based scientific literacy

In recent years, a number of curriculum reform projects have championed the notion of having students do science in ways that move beyond hands-on work with authentic materials and methods, or developing a conceptual grasp of current theories. These reformers have argued that students should come to an understanding of science through doing the discipline and taking a high degree of agency over investigations from start to finish. This stance has occasionally been mocked by its critics as an attempt to create “little scientists”—a mission, it is implied, that is either romantic or without purpose. Here, we make the strong case for a practice-based scientific literacy, arguing through three related empirical studies that taking the notion of “little scientists” seriously might be more productive in achieving current standards for scientific literacy than continuing to refine ideas and techniques based on the coverage of conceptual content. Study 1 is a classroom case study that illustrates how project-based instruction can be carried out when teachers develop guidance and support strategies to bootstrap students' participation in forms of inquiry they are still in the process of mastering. Study 2 shows how sustained on-line work with volunteer scientists appears to influence students' success in formulating credible scientific arguments in written project reports following an authentic genre. Study 3, using data from three suburban high school classes, suggests that involving students in the formulation of research questions and data analysis strategies results in better spontaneous use of empirical data collection and analysis strategies on a transfer task. The study also suggests that failing to involve students in the formulation of research can result in a loss of agency. The implications of these findings for future research and practice are discussed. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Res Sci Teach 41: 234–266, 2004

[1]  J. Berger The Young Scientists: America's Future and the Winning of the Westinghouse, Joseph Berger. 1994. Addison-Wesley, New York, NY. 256 pages. ISBN: 0-201-63255-1. $21.95 , 1996 .

[2]  Nancy Butler Songer,et al.  Exploring learning opportunities in coordinated network-enhanced classrooms: A case of kids as global scientists. , 1996 .

[3]  Willie Pearson,et al.  Who will do science? : educating the next generation , 1995 .

[4]  Joseph L. Polman,et al.  Dialogic Activity Structures for Project-Based Learning Environments , 2004 .

[5]  C. Bazerman Shaping Written Knowledge: The Genre and Activity of the Experimental Article in Science , 1989 .

[6]  Cliff Konold,et al.  Network Science, A Decade Later. , 1999 .

[7]  K. Popper,et al.  The Logic of Scientific Discovery , 1960 .

[8]  Roy D. Pea,et al.  Seeing What We Build Together: Distributed Multimedia Learning Environments for Transformative Communications , 1994 .

[9]  The myth of science education , 1990 .

[10]  L. Cremin The Transformation of the School: Progressivism in American Education, 1876-1957 , 1961 .

[11]  Deborah Meier,et al.  The Power of Their Ideas: Lessons for America from a Small School in Harlem , 2002 .

[12]  Roy D. Pea,et al.  Transformative Communication as a Cultural Tool for Guiding Inquiry Science. , 2001 .

[13]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[14]  Lev Vygotsky Mind in society , 1978 .

[15]  J. Shea National Science Education Standards , 1995 .

[16]  Neil Postman,et al.  Technopoly: The Surrender of Culture to Technology , 1993 .

[17]  Richard Ruopp,et al.  LabNet: Toward a community of practice , 1993 .

[18]  Roy D. Pea,et al.  The collaborative visualization project , 1993, CACM.

[19]  A. Collins,et al.  Epistemic forms and Epistemic Games: Structures and Strategies to Guide Inquiry , 1993 .

[20]  Leslie R. Herrenkohl,et al.  Participant Structures, Scientific Discourse, and Student Engagement in Fourth Grade , 1998 .

[21]  Denis Newman,et al.  The Construction Zone: Working for Cognitive Change in School , 1989 .

[22]  Joseph L. Polman,et al.  Designing Project-Based Science: Connecting Learners Through Guided Inquiry (Ways of Knowing in Science Series) , 1999 .

[23]  William H. Schmidt,et al.  A splintered vision : an investigation of U.S. science and mathematics education , 1997 .

[24]  A. Collins,et al.  Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning , 1989 .

[25]  J. Dewey Science as subject-matter and as method , 1995 .

[26]  Joseph Krajcik,et al.  Lessons Learned: How Collaboration Helped Middle Grade Science Teachers Learn Project-Based Instruction , 1994, The Elementary School Journal.

[27]  David Kevin O'Neill Engaging science practice through science practitioners: Design experiments in K-12 telementoring , 1998 .

[28]  M. Shamos,et al.  The Myth of Scientific Literacy , 1995 .

[29]  D. Kevin O'Neill Knowing When You've Brought Them in: Scientific Genre Knowledge and Communities of Practice , 2001 .

[30]  Greg Myers,et al.  Writing biology : texts in the social construction of scientific knowledge , 1990 .

[31]  M. Linn,et al.  Scientific arguments as learning artifacts: designing for learning from the web with KIE , 2000 .

[32]  J. Lemke Talking Science: Language, Learning, and Values , 1990 .

[33]  M. Scardamalia,et al.  Higher Levels of Agency for Children in Knowledge Building: A Challenge for the Design of New Knowledge Media , 1991 .