Investigation on the performance evaluation method of flow batteries

Abstract Performance evaluation method is very important for the research on flow batteries. Charging–discharging test is the most typical evaluation method for flow batteries. Recently, the polarization curves, together with the associated power density curves, which are commonly employed in fuel cells, have come into use for flow batteries' performance evaluation. Based on the investigation of performance evaluation method, it is confirmed charging–discharging test is optimal for flow batteries' performance evaluation. A comparison of voltage losses (voltage efficiency, VE) can be clearly delivered from the polarization curves, which are quite practical for fuel cells' performance evaluation. While for flow batteries, apart from VE, coulombic efficiency (CE), energy efficiency (EE), utilization of electrolyte (UE) and capacity stability should be seriously considered during charging–discharging process. However, CE and UE are inaccessible; accordingly EE and capacity stability can't be detected from polarization curves. Therefore, the polarization curve is improper to serve as a performance evaluation method for flow batteries. On the premise of a proper CE, a rough performance evaluation for flow batteries can be achieved via the polarization curves. The peak power density is of limited significance in practical use due to the extremely low EE obtained at that point.

[1]  Qinghua Liu,et al.  Dramatic performance gains in vanadium redox flow batteries through modified cell architecture , 2012 .

[2]  Xianfeng Li,et al.  Silica modified nanofiltration membranes with improved selectivity for redox flow battery application , 2012 .

[3]  C. Low,et al.  Progress in redox flow batteries, remaining challenges and their applications in energy storage , 2012 .

[4]  Huamin Zhang,et al.  Characteristics and performance of 10 kW class all-vanadium redox-flow battery stack , 2006 .

[5]  A. Weber,et al.  Modeling transport in polymer-electrolyte fuel cells. , 2004, Chemical reviews.

[6]  Thomas A. Zawodzinski,et al.  Polarization curve analysis of all-vanadium redox flow batteries , 2011 .

[7]  Emin Caglan Kumbur,et al.  Role of convection and related effects on species crossover and capacity loss in vanadium redox flow batteries , 2012 .

[8]  Maria Skyllas-Kazacos,et al.  Progress in Flow Battery Research and Development , 2011 .

[9]  B. Jonshagen,et al.  The zinc/bromine battery system for utility and remote area applications , 1999 .

[10]  Maria Skyllas-Kazacos,et al.  Investigation of the V(V)/V(IV) system for use in the positive half-cell of a redox battery , 1985 .

[11]  Maria Skyllas-Kazacos,et al.  Performance Characteristics of Carbon Plastic Electrodes in the All‐Vanadium Redox Cell , 1989 .

[12]  Huamin Zhang,et al.  A comparative study of carbon felt and activated carbon based electrodes for sodium polysulfide/bromine redox flow battery , 2006 .

[13]  Liquan Chen,et al.  Research progress of vanadium redox flow battery for energy storage in China , 2008 .

[14]  Mike L. Perry,et al.  High Power Density Redox Flow Battery Cells , 2013 .

[15]  Qinghua Liu,et al.  High Performance Vanadium Redox Flow Batteries with Optimized Electrode Configuration and Membrane Selection , 2012 .

[16]  Hak Koon Yeoh,et al.  An enhancement to Vynnycky's model for the all-vanadium redox flow battery , 2014 .

[17]  J. Bao,et al.  Studies on pressure losses and flow rate optimization in vanadium redox flow battery , 2014 .

[18]  Michael Vynnycky,et al.  Analysis of a model for the operation of a vanadium redox battery , 2011 .

[19]  Zhihong Liu,et al.  Graphene oxide nanoplatelets as excellent electrochemical active materials for VO2+/VO2+ and V2+/V3+ redox couples for a vanadium redox flow battery , 2011 .

[20]  M. Mench,et al.  Redox flow batteries: a review , 2011 .

[21]  D. Aurbach Review of selected electrode–solution interactions which determine the performance of Li and Li ion batteries , 2000 .

[22]  Xianfeng Li,et al.  Nanofiltration (NF) membranes: the next generation separators for all vanadium redox flow batteries (VRBs)? , 2011 .

[23]  Maria Skyllas-Kazacos,et al.  Recent advances with UNSW vanadium‐based redox flow batteries , 2010 .