Updates on Evidence-Based Practices to Reduce Preoperative and Intraoperative Contamination of Implants in Spine Surgery: A Narrative Review

The current communication seeks to provide an updated narrative review on latest methods of reducing implant contaminations used during spine surgery. Recent literature review has shown that both preoperative reprocessing and intraoperative handling of implants seem to contaminate implants. In brief, during preoperative phase, the implants undergo repeated bulk cleaning with dirty instruments from the OR, leading to residue buildup at the interfaces and possibly on the surfaces too. This, due to its concealed nature, remains unnoticed by the SPD (sterile processing department) or other hospital staff. Nevertheless, these can be avoided by using individually prepackaged presterilized implants. In the intraoperative phase, the implants (in the sterile field) are directly touched by the scrub tech with soiled (assisting the surgeon dispose the tissues from the instruments in use) gloves for loading onto an insertion device. It is then kept exposed on the working table (either separately or next to the used instruments as the pedicles hole are being prepared). Latest investigation has shown that by the time it is implanted in the patient, it can harbor up to 10e7 bacterial colony-forming units. The same implants were devoid of such colony-forming units, when sheathed by an impermeable sterile sheath around the sterile implant.

[1]  Jeffrey C. Wang,et al.  Harboring Contaminants in Repeatedly Reprocessed Pedicle Screws , 2018, Global spine journal.

[2]  V. Goel,et al.  Efficacy of Intraoperative Implant Prophylaxis in Reducing Intraoperative Microbial Contamination , 2018, Global spine journal.

[3]  A. Macmillan,et al.  A Paradigm Shift Toward Terminally Sterilized Devices , 2018, Clinical spine surgery.

[4]  V. Goel,et al.  Implant Prophylaxis: The Next Best Practice Toward Asepsis in Spine Surgery , 2018, Global spine journal.

[5]  A. Leithner,et al.  Pedicle screw loosening is correlated to chronic subclinical deep implant infection: a retrospective database analysis , 2018, European Spine Journal.

[6]  I. Lieberman,et al.  Revision spine surgery in patients without clinical signs of infection: How often are there occult infections in removed hardware? , 2017, European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society.

[7]  M. Shamji,et al.  Prevention of Surgical Site Infection in Spine Surgery , 2017, Neurosurgery.

[8]  A. Sama,et al.  Occult Infection in Patients Who Have Undergone Spinal Surgery with Instrumentation , 2016 .

[9]  S. McClelland,et al.  Analysis of Postoperative Thoracolumbar Spine Infections in a Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial Using the Centers for Disease Control Surgical Site Infection Criteria , 2016, International Journal of Spine Surgery.

[10]  M A Bell,et al.  Hospital uses team approach to improve processes, reduce costs. , 1998, AORN journal.