The implementation of BIM within the public procurement: A model-based approach for the construction industry

Recently more and more Public Sectors have been paying close attention to save cost and, at the same time, improve efficiency. Usually, the Construction Industry has a relevant annual turnover, which represents an important part of the GDP for most of the EU countries and concerns in a large part the Public Sector. Thus, some Public Clients, such as UK, are adopting new strategies in order to improve the current situation. One of these strategies is Building Information Modelling (BIM), which forces all the parties involved in the process to adopt a collaborative approach reducing inefficiencies. Moreover, also the European Parliament is going to encourage the BIM adoption to ‘modernise the procurement process and ensure greater efficiencies’. The EU Directive will be an important push to reform the EU Members’ Public Construction Procurement. The aim of this M. Sc. Thesis is to analyse the possible implementation of BIM within the Public Procurement, especially how Model Checking can be applied within Tendering to verify the compliance between the Client’s requirements and the bid’s contents. The first part presents both the most widespread Public Procurement Methods, such as Design-Bid-Build (DBB), Design-Build (DB), Construction Management (CM), Design-Build-Operate (DBO) and Design-Build-Finance-Operate (DBFO), as well as innovative kinds of Procurement Procedures, such as Integrated Project Delivery (IPD), Project Alliancing (PA), Cost Led Procurement (CLP), Integrated Project Insurance (IPI), Two Stage Open Book and Early BIM Partnering (EBP). A paragraph is dedicated to the drivers and the barriers of e-Procurement, which should be part of the Public Procurement strategy. Later, the main issues related to BIM are shown, such as current BIM Authorised Uses and Permitted Purposes, Interoperability and OpenBIM, along with BIM implementation in Public Sector of several countries (Singapore, USA, Finland, UK, Norway, Denmark, Netherlands, South Korea, Hong Kong, Australia, New Zealand, Iceland, Estonia, Sweden, Germany, China, Ireland, Taiwan and Italy) and the relation between e-Procurement and BIM. Additionally, the principal possibilities and challenges dealing with BIM adoption are presented. The following chapter is dedicated to the investigation of the possible BIM implementation in Tendering. Even if integrated procedures, such as IPD, seem to be the most suitable with BIM, a discussion of the BIM role in DBB and DB or Design Competitions is carried out, showing the main Client’s requirements, benefits for Bidders and Clients, together with limitations and possibilities. Thereafter, a paragraph illustrates Model Checking in the evaluation of design proposals. First, a short description of the main commercial software, which can support BIM-based tendering (such as Solibri Model Checker (SMC), EDM Model Server, dRofus, Affinity, dProfiler, Autodesk NavisWorks, Tekla BIMsight, Bentley Projectwise Navigator, Riuska, Autodesk Ecotect, EasyBIM, Vico Cost Planner and Mitchell Brandtman) is provided. Later, a list of the most common operations, which nowadays

[1]  Ricardo Jardim-Goncalves,et al.  Challenging electronic procurement in the AEC sector: A BIM-based integrated perspective , 2011 .

[2]  Barry McAuley,et al.  Addressing the Need to Reform Construction Public Procurement in Ireland through the Implementation of Building Information Modelling , 2012 .

[3]  Ricardo Jardim-Goncalves,et al.  SOA4BIM: Putting the building and construction industry in the Single European Information Space , 2010 .

[4]  Srinath Perera,et al.  Identification of e-procurement drivers and barriers for UK construction organisations and ranking of these from the perspective of quantity surveyors , 2010, J. Inf. Technol. Constr..

[5]  Robert Amor,et al.  Automated Building Code Compliance Checking – Where is it at? , 2013 .

[6]  Robin Drogemuller,et al.  An Authorization Framework using Building Information Models , 2012, Comput. J..

[7]  Stephen Emmitt,et al.  An Investigation into whether Building Information Modelling (BIM) can Assist with Construction Delay Claims , 2013, Int. J. 3 D Inf. Model..

[8]  Albert Sánchez Graells Integrity and Efficiency in Sustainable Public Contracts , 2014 .

[9]  António Grilo,et al.  Cloud-Marketplaces: Distributed e-procurement for the AEC sector , 2013, Adv. Eng. Informatics.

[10]  E W East,et al.  Construction Operations Building Information Exchange (COBIE): Requirements Definition and Pilot Implementation Standard , 2007 .

[11]  Eilif Hjelseth,et al.  OVERVIEW OF CONCEPTS FOR MODEL CHECKING , 2010 .

[12]  T Koppinen,et al.  The current and future performance of road project delivery methods , 2004 .

[13]  Charles M. Eastman,et al.  Semantics of model views for information exchanges using the industry foundation class schema , 2012, Adv. Eng. Informatics.

[14]  Kjeld Svidt,et al.  Requirements on 3D Building Information Models and Electronic Communication , 2008, ICIT 2008.

[15]  Eilif Hjelseth Converting performance based regulations into computable rules in BIM based model checking software , 2012 .

[16]  Gabriella M. Racca The Electronic Award and Execution of Public Procurement , 2012 .

[17]  Petra von Both Potentials and Barriers for Implementing BIM in the German AEC Market: Results of a Current Market Analysis , 2012 .

[18]  Charles M. Eastman,et al.  Automatic rule-based checking of building designs , 2009 .

[19]  Abid Nadeem,et al.  Comparative roles of major stakeholders for the implementation of BIM in various countries , 2009 .

[20]  Charles M. Eastman,et al.  BIM Handbook: A Guide to Building Information Modeling for Owners, Managers, Designers, Engineers and Contractors , 2008 .

[21]  Jane Matthews,et al.  Automated compliance checking using building information models , 2010 .

[22]  Abdul Razak Hamdan,et al.  Modelling ontology for supporting construction tender evaluation process , 2011, 2011 International Conference on Semantic Technology and Information Retrieval.

[23]  Peter Raisbeck,et al.  Assessing integrated project delivery: A comparative analysis of ipd and alliance contracting procurement routes , 2010 .

[24]  Pietro Previtali,et al.  National models of public (e)-procurement in Europe , 2010 .

[25]  Jan Karlshøj,et al.  Bygherrekrav vedrørende 3D-modeller, visualisering og simulering , 2005 .

[26]  Bilal Succar,et al.  Building information modelling framework: A research and delivery foundation for industry stakeholders , 2009 .

[27]  Paola Sanguinetti,et al.  General system architecture for BIM: An integrated approach for design and analysis , 2012, Adv. Eng. Informatics.

[28]  Kalle Kähkönen,et al.  BIM-based Safety Management and Communication for Building Construction , 2011 .

[29]  Benedict D. Ilozor,et al.  Building Information Modeling and Integrated Project Delivery in the Commercial Construction Industry: A Conceptual Study , 2012 .

[30]  Ting-Ya Hsieh,et al.  BIM-Based Government Procurement System- The Likely Development in Taiwan , 2011 .

[31]  Richard Laing,et al.  Drivers for Change in Construction Procurement and its Impact on Management , 2009, 2009 Second International Conference in Visualisation.

[32]  Hannes Lindblad,et al.  Study of the implementation process of BIM in construction projects , 2013 .

[33]  Pertti Lahdenperä,et al.  Financial analysis of road project delivery systems , 2009 .

[34]  Srinath Perera,et al.  E-readiness of construction contract forms and e-tendering software , 2012 .

[35]  Peter Demian,et al.  Benefits and barriers of building information modelling , 2008 .

[36]  Srinath Perera,et al.  A cross-discipline comparison of rankings for e-procurement drivers and barriers within UK construction organisations , 2010, J. Inf. Technol. Constr..

[37]  Srinath Perera,et al.  Analysis of the Use of e-procurement in the Public and Private Sectors of the UK Construction Industry , 2011, J. Inf. Technol. Constr..

[38]  Carolina Soto Ogueta,et al.  Object Interaction Query: A Context Awareness Tool for Evaluating BIM Components’ Interactions , 2013 .

[39]  Ricardo Jardim-Goncalves,et al.  ELECTRONIC PUBLIC PROCUREMENT OF CONSTRUCTION AND PUBLIC WORKS : TOWARDS A NEW REALITY , 2010 .

[40]  Salman Azhar,et al.  Building Information Modeling ( BIM ) : Benefits , Risks and Challenges , 2008 .

[41]  Craig W. Furneaux,et al.  BIM – implications for government , 2008 .

[42]  Martin Hooper BIM Anatomy - An Investigation into Implementation Prerequisites , 2012 .

[43]  Jin-Lee Kim,et al.  Building code compliance checking using BIM technology , 2011, Proceedings of the 2011 Winter Simulation Conference (WSC).

[44]  Vtt Publications Design-Build Procedures Introduction, illustration and comparison of U.S. modes , 2001 .

[45]  Arto Kiviniemi,et al.  The IFC Standard - A Review of History, Development, and Standardization , 2012, J. Inf. Technol. Constr..

[46]  Ricardo Jardim-Goncalves,et al.  Building information modeling and interoperability , 2010 .

[47]  Pertti Lahdenperä,et al.  Making sense of the multi-party contractual arrangements of project partnering, project alliancing and integrated project delivery , 2012 .

[48]  Kasun Hewage,et al.  Building Information Modeling (BIM) partnering framework for public construction projects , 2013 .

[49]  Srinath Perera,et al.  Drivers and barriers to public sector e-procurement within Northern Ireland's construction industry , 2007, J. Inf. Technol. Constr..

[50]  Judy A. Kraatz,et al.  Modelling, collaboration and integration : a case study for the delivery of public buildings , 2013 .

[51]  L. V. Tavares,et al.  Evidence of the impacts of public e-procurement: The Portuguese experience , 2013 .