Case Study: Safety Assessment of Plant Layout between Ethylene Storage Tanks and Process Equipment According to Capacity and Weather Conditions

In a chemical plant, even if an explosion occurs in a storage tank that handles flammable materials, the minimum separation distance is applied in a way to prevent chain explosion. This is because when an explosion occurs in a storage tank, thermal radiation affects nearby process equipment and causes a chain explosion. The separation distance between storage tanks and process equipment in a chemical plant depends on the global engineering guidelines PIP (Process Industry Practice) PNE00003 and GAPS (Global Asset Protection Services) GAP.2.5.2. However, there is a limitation in the global engineering guidelines that provide only a consistent separation distance according to the item types without considering the storage capacity and climatic conditions around the storage tank. This study analyzed the distance of thermal radiation (up to 37.5 kW/m2) according to the capacity of ethylene storage tank and climatic conditions by utilizing the Phast (DNV GL), which is widely used as a tool for quantitative risk analysis. The accident scenario was applied using the U.S. EPA (Environment Protection Agency)’s worst leakage accident scenario, considering climate variables, air temperature, wind speed, and atmospheric stability. In the simulation, atmospheric stability did not affect the radius of thermal radiation. Moreover, the thermal radiation tended to increase with increase in wind speed in the ambient condition and winter, but not in summer. Because both PIP PNE00003 and GAP.2.5.2 yield consistent separation distances without considering storage capacity and weather conditions, quantitative risk analysis of the results of thermal radiation is necessary to ensure safety.

[1]  Frank P. Lees,et al.  Loss Prevention In The Process Industries , 1980 .

[2]  J. C. Mecklenburgh,et al.  Process plant layout , 1985 .

[3]  G. A. Melhem,et al.  Improve the design of fire emergency relief systems , 1995 .

[4]  Stan Schofield,et al.  Offshore QRA and the ALARP principle , 1998 .

[5]  H. Pasman Loss prevention in the process industries , 2002 .

[6]  Jong-Ho Lee,et al.  Performance Based Design of Passive Fire Protection Using Consequence Analysis , 2004 .

[7]  Marion Michael Hightower,et al.  Safety implications of a large LNG tanker spill over water , 2005 .

[8]  Mike Johnson,et al.  A summary of some experimental data on LNG safety. , 2007, Journal of hazardous materials.

[9]  Valerio Cozzani,et al.  The development of an inherent safety approach to the prevention of domino accidents. , 2009, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[10]  Chi-Min Shu,et al.  Applications of 3D QRA technique to the fire/explosion simulation and hazard mitigation within a naphtha-cracking plant , 2009 .

[11]  Cheng-I Lin,et al.  Research on safety and security distance of flammable liquid storage tank , 2011 .

[12]  Dongil Shin,et al.  Optimal layout of additional facilities for minimization of domino effects based on worst-case scenarios , 2011 .

[13]  Raghu Raman,et al.  Experience in the Application of the Goal Setting Regime and Risk-Based Design of Safety Critical Elements in the Oil and Gas Industry , 2013 .

[14]  Shin-Kyu Oh,et al.  A Study on Safety Distance for Small Scale LNG Storage facility , 2014 .

[15]  Hern-Chang Lee,et al.  Consequence Analysis for Fire and Explosion Accidents in Propylene Recovery Process , 2014 .

[16]  A. Gibson,et al.  Post-fire integrity of composite gratings for offshore platforms , 2014 .

[17]  Arshad Ahmad,et al.  Designing an Optimal Safe Layout for a Fuel Storage Tanks Farm: Case Study of Jaipur Oil Depot , 2014 .

[18]  Seungho Jung,et al.  Recommended Evacuation Distance for Offsite Risk Assessment of Ammonia Release Scenarios , 2016 .

[19]  Jeonghwan Kim,et al.  Offsite Consequence Modeling for Evacuation Distances against Accidental Hydrogen Fluoride (HF) Release Scenarios , 2016 .

[20]  Hyun Sub Kim,et al.  Analysis of Impact Zone of Quantitative Risk Assessment based on Accident Scenarios by Meteorological Factors , 2017 .

[21]  Jung-Ho Choi,et al.  Performance Improvement on the Re-Liquefaction System of Ethylene Carrier using Low-Global Warming Potential Refrigerants , 2018, Journal of the Society of Naval Architects of Korea.

[22]  Jan F. Stene,et al.  Verification and validation of Phast consequence models for accidental releases of toxic or flammable chemicals to the atmosphere , 2018, Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries.

[23]  J. Yang,et al.  The Research of Layout Optimization for LNG Liquefaction Plant to Save the Capital Expenditures , 2019 .