Assessing how science faculty learning communities promote scientific teaching

Although there is a need for continued pedagogical advancement in science undergraduate education, what is needed more urgently is more widespread adaptation of pedagogical practices that research has already shown to promote learning. Those practices include interactive engagement pedagogies such as active learning and inquiry‐based learning. The need now is to find ways to integrate and institutionalize these evidence‐based strategies for teaching science and to help science faculty learn about and implement them. Scientific Teaching Learning Communities (STLCs) create a culture that values scholarly teaching within science departments, important for bridging the gap between science and education and for improving undergraduate science learning. Evidence for the impact of STLCs on the student‐learning environment was obtained through the development and use of the Participant Assessment of Learning Gains survey, an adaptation of the online Student Assessment of Learning Gains survey originally developed by Seymour et al. (Available at: http://www.wcer.wisc.edu/salgains/instructor/SALGains.asp, 1997 and Paper presented at the National Meeting of the American Chemical Society, 2000). Data reveal how STLCs are transforming faculty behavior and directly affecting what they do in their science classrooms.

[1]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[2]  William Wood,et al.  Meeting report: the first National Academies Summer Institute for Undergraduate Education in Biology. , 2003, Cell biology education.

[3]  R. Hake Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses , 1998 .

[4]  Michael B. Paulsen,et al.  Taking Teaching Seriously: Meeting the Challenge of Instructional Improvement. ERIC Digest. , 1995 .

[5]  Mark Connolly Using Workshops to Improve Instruction in STEM Courses , 2006 .

[6]  Michael B. Paulsen,et al.  Taking Teaching Seriously: Meeting the Challenge of Instructional Improvement. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 2, 1995. , 1995 .

[7]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. , 1999 .

[8]  C. Bonwell,et al.  Active Learning: Creating Excitement in the Classroom. ERIC Digest. , 1991 .

[9]  Trevor R Anderson,et al.  Bridging the educational research‐teaching practice gap , 2010, Biochemistry and molecular biology education : a bimonthly publication of the International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.

[10]  Douglas Huffman,et al.  What does the force concept inventory actually measure , 1995 .

[11]  D. E. Allen,et al.  On hiring science faculty with education specialties for your science (not education) department. , 2006, CBE life sciences education.

[12]  Jo Handelsman,et al.  Meeting report: the 2004 National Academies Summer Institute on Undergraduate Education in Biology. , 2004, Cell biology education.

[13]  J. Zull The Art of Changing the Brain , 2023 .

[14]  Trevor R Anderson Bridging the educational research‐teaching practice gap , 2007, Biochemistry and molecular biology education : a bimonthly publication of the International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.

[15]  C. Bonwell,et al.  Active learning : creating excitement in the classroom , 1991 .

[16]  John B. Shoven,et al.  I , Edinburgh Medical and Surgical Journal.

[17]  Karen Sirum,et al.  Enabling a Culture of Change: A Life Science Faculty Learning Community Promotes Scientific Teaching. , 2009 .

[18]  E. Seymour,et al.  Talking About Leaving: Why Undergraduates Leave The Sciences , 1997 .

[19]  Milton D. Cox Introduction to Faculty Learning Communities. , 2004 .

[20]  S. Polich 7: Assessment of a Faculty Learning Community Program: Do Faculty Members Really Change? , 2008 .

[21]  Diane Ebert-May,et al.  Scientific Teaching , 2004, Science.

[22]  H. Tohidi,et al.  Organizational culture and leadership , 2012 .

[23]  J. R. Scotti,et al.  Available From , 1973 .