Actigraph GT3X: Validation and Determination of Physical Activity Intensity Cut Points

The aims of this study were: to compare energy expenditure (EE) estimated from the existing GT3X accelerometer equations and EE measured with indirect calorimetry; to define new equations for EE estimation with the GT3X in youth, adults and older people; and to define GT3X vector magnitude (VM) cut points allowing to classify PA intensity in the aforementioned age-groups. The study comprised 31 youth, 31 adults and 35 older people. Participants wore the GT3X (setup: 1-s epoch) over their right hip during 6 conditions of 10-min duration each: resting, treadmill walking/running at 3, 5, 7, and 9 km · h⁻¹, and repeated sit-stands (30 times · min⁻¹). The GT3X proved to be a good tool to predict EE in youth and adults (able to discriminate between the aforementioned conditions), but not in the elderly. We defined the following equations: for all age-groups combined, EE (METs)=2.7406+0.00056 · VM activity counts (counts · min⁻¹)-0.008542 · age (years)-0.01380 ·  body mass (kg); for youth, METs=1.546618+0.000658 · VM activity counts (counts · min⁻¹); for adults, METs=2.8323+0.00054 · VM activity counts (counts · min⁻¹)-0.059123 · body mass (kg)+1.4410 · gender (women=1, men=2); and for the elderly, METs=2.5878+0.00047 · VM activity counts (counts · min⁻¹)-0.6453 · gender (women=1, men=2). Activity counts derived from the VM yielded a more accurate EE estimation than those derived from the Y-axis. The GT3X represents a step forward in triaxial technology estimating EE. However, age-specific equations must be used to ensure the correct use of this device.

[1]  Gregory J Welk,et al.  Protocols for evaluating equivalency of accelerometry-based activity monitors. , 2012, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[2]  A. Bauman,et al.  Physical activity and public health: updated recommendation for adults from the American College of Sports Medicine and the American Heart Association. , 2007, Circulation.

[3]  I-Min Lee,et al.  the American College of Sports Medicine and the American Heart Association Physical Activity and Public Health. Updated Recommendation for Adults From , 2007 .

[4]  Dinesh John,et al.  Validation and comparison of ActiGraph activity monitors. , 2011, Journal of science and medicine in sport.

[5]  J. D. Janssen,et al.  Assessment of energy expenditure for physical activity using a triaxial accelerometer. , 1994, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[6]  P S Freedson,et al.  Calibration of the Computer Science and Applications, Inc. accelerometer. , 1998, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[7]  G Atkinson,et al.  Update – Ethical Standards in Sport and Exercise Science Research , 2011, International Journal of Sports Medicine.

[8]  S. Blair,et al.  Validation of the actical activity monitor in middle-aged and older adults. , 2011, Journal of physical activity & health.

[9]  D. Altman,et al.  STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT , 1986, The Lancet.

[10]  M. Tremblay,et al.  Moderate and vigorous physical activity intensity cut-points for the Actical accelerometer , 2011, Journal of sports sciences.

[11]  D. Bassett,et al.  The technology of accelerometry-based activity monitors: current and future. , 2005, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[12]  S. Trost,et al.  Calibration of the biotrainer pro activity monitor in children. , 2007, Pediatric exercise science.

[13]  D R Bassett,et al.  A new 2-regression model for the Actical accelerometer , 2007, British Journal of Sports Medicine.

[14]  S. Blair,et al.  Calibration of an accelerometer during free-living activities in children. , 2007, International journal of pediatric obesity : IJPO : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity.

[15]  D L Smith,et al.  Comparison of accelerometers with oxygen consumption in older adults during exercise. , 1999, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[16]  M. Sun,et al.  Improving energy expenditure estimation by using a triaxial accelerometer. , 1997, Journal of applied physiology.

[17]  Kate Lyden,et al.  Accelerometer output and MET values of common physical activities. , 2010, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[18]  John Staudenmayer,et al.  Statistical considerations in the analysis of accelerometry-based activity monitor data. , 2012, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[19]  M. Zweig,et al.  Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) plots: a fundamental evaluation tool in clinical medicine. , 1993, Clinical chemistry.

[20]  Patty Freedson,et al.  Assessment of physical activity using wearable monitors: recommendations for monitor calibration and use in the field. , 2012, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[21]  M. Puyau,et al.  Validation and calibration of physical activity monitors in children. , 2002, Obesity research.

[22]  P. Freedson,et al.  Validity of accelerometry for the assessment of moderate intensity physical activity in the field. , 2000, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[23]  D R Bassett,et al.  Comparison of MTI Accelerometer Cut-Points for Predicting Time Spent in Physical Activity , 2003, International journal of sports medicine.

[24]  Miriam C Morey,et al.  METs and accelerometry of walking in older adults: standard versus measured energy cost. , 2013, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[25]  John Gormley,et al.  Validation of the RT3 in the measurement of physical activity in children. , 2009, Journal of science and medicine in sport.

[26]  Francisco B. Ortega,et al.  Artificial neural network-based equation for estimating VO2max from the 20 m shuttle run test in adolescents , 2008, Artif. Intell. Medicine.

[27]  Maciej S Buchowski,et al.  Validation of the ActiGraph two-regression model for predicting energy expenditure. , 2010, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[28]  U. Ekelund,et al.  Assessing physical activity using wearable monitors: measures of physical activity. , 2012, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[29]  Ralph Maddison,et al.  Estimating Energy Expenditure With the RT3 Triaxial Accelerometer , 2009, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[30]  Patty Freedson,et al.  Calibration of accelerometer output for children. , 2005, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[31]  José Manuel Benítez,et al.  Neural Networks in R Using the Stuttgart Neural Network Simulator: RSNNS , 2012 .

[32]  A. Rowlands,et al.  Validation of the GT3X ActiGraph in children and comparison with the GT1M ActiGraph. , 2013, Journal of science and medicine in sport.

[33]  Scott J Strath,et al.  Accelerometer use with children, older adults, and adults with functional limitations. , 2012, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[34]  S. Ward,et al.  Effect of interbreath fluctuations on characterizing exercise gas exchange kinetics. , 1987, Journal of applied physiology.

[35]  Charles E Matthew,et al.  Calibration of accelerometer output for adults. , 2005, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[36]  Stewart G Trost,et al.  Comparison of accelerometer cut points for predicting activity intensity in youth. , 2011, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[37]  Scott E Crouter,et al.  Refined two-regression model for the ActiGraph accelerometer. , 2010, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[38]  D. Bassett,et al.  Estimating energy expenditure using accelerometers , 2006, European Journal of Applied Physiology.

[39]  John W Staudenmayer,et al.  Accelerometer prediction of energy expenditure: vector magnitude versus vertical axis. , 2009, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.