Assessment of Dimensional Integrity and Spatial Defect Localization in Additive Manufacturing Using Spectral Graph Theory

The ability of additive manufacturing (AM) processes to produce components with virtually any geometry presents a unique challenge in terms of quantifying the dimensional quality of the part. In this paper, a novel spectral graph theory (SGT) approach is proposed for resolving the following critical quality assurance concern in the AM: how to quantify the relative deviation in dimensional integrity of complex AM components. Here, the SGT approach is demonstrated for classifying the dimensional integrity of standardized test components. The SGT-based topological invariant Fiedler number (λ2) was calculated from 3D point cloud coordinate measurements and used to quantify the dimensional integrity of test components. The Fiedler number was found to differ significantly for parts originating from different AM processes (statistical significance p-value <1%). By comparison, prevalent dimensional integrity assessment techniques, such as traditional statistical quantifiers (e.g., mean and standard deviation) and examination of specific facets/landmarks failed to capture part-to-part variations, proved incapable of ranking the quality of test AM components in a consistent manner. In contrast, the SGT approach was able to consistently rank the quality of the AM components with a high degree of statistical confidence independent of sampling technique used. Consequently, from a practical standpoint, the SGT approach can be a powerful tool for assessing the dimensional integrity of the AM components, and thus encourage wider adoption of the AM capabilities.

[1]  Paul J. Scott,et al.  Freeform surface characterisation - a fresh strategy , 2007 .

[2]  Johannes A. Soons,et al.  Variability in the Geometric Accuracy of Additively Manufactured Test Parts | NIST , 2010 .

[3]  Eleonora Atzeni,et al.  Proposal of an innovative benchmark for accuracy evaluation of dental crown manufacturing , 2012, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[4]  Brent Stucker,et al.  An Integrated Approach to Additive Manufacturing Simulations Using Physics Based, Coupled Multiscale Process Modeling , 2014 .

[5]  Yosry Morsi,et al.  Error analysis of FDM fabricated medical replicas , 2010 .

[6]  Andrea Gatto,et al.  Benchmarking of Rapid Prototyping Techniques in Terms of Dimensional Accuracy and Surface Finish , 1995 .

[7]  Prahalad Krishna Rao Sensor-based monitoring and inspection of surface morphology in ultraprecision manufacturing processes , 2013 .

[8]  Frederik L. Giesel,et al.  3D printing based on imaging data: review of medical applications , 2010, International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery.

[9]  Enrico Savio,et al.  Metrology of freeform shaped parts , 2007 .

[10]  Vinesh Raja,et al.  Rapid and cost-effective manufacturing of high-integrity aerospace components , 2006 .

[11]  R. Paul,et al.  Effect of Thermal Deformation on Part Errors in Metal Powder Based Additive Manufacturing Processes , 2014 .

[12]  Robert Schmitt,et al.  Computed tomography for dimensional metrology , 2011 .

[13]  Joaquim Ciurana,et al.  Pursuing successful rapid manufacturing: a users' best‐practices approach , 2008 .

[14]  Fan Chung,et al.  Spectral Graph Theory , 1996 .

[15]  Pablo Irarrazaval,et al.  Quantitative assessments of geometric errors for rapid prototyping in medical applications , 2012 .

[16]  Chee Kai Chua,et al.  Measurement Science Roadmap for Additive Manufacturing , 2017 .

[17]  Bernhard Mueller,et al.  Additive Manufacturing Technologies – Rapid Prototyping to Direct Digital Manufacturing , 2012 .

[18]  Christiane Beyer,et al.  Strategic Implications of Current Trends in Additive Manufacturing , 2014 .

[19]  M A. Donmez,et al.  A Review of Test Artifacts for Additive Manufacturing , 2012 .

[20]  Satish T. S. Bukkapatnam,et al.  A graph-theoretic approach for quantification of surface morphology variation and its application to chemical mechanical planarization process , 2015 .

[21]  L. Love,et al.  The importance of carbon fiber to polymer additive manufacturing , 2014 .

[22]  Saigopal Nelaturi,et al.  Manufacturability Feedback and Model Correction for Additive Manufacturing , 2014 .

[23]  Burcu Akinci,et al.  Automatic Reconstruction of As-Built Building Information Models from Laser-Scanned Point Clouds: A Review of Related Techniques | NIST , 2010 .

[24]  Timon Mallepree,et al.  Accuracy of medical RP models , 2009 .

[25]  Han Tong Loh,et al.  Benchmarking for comparative evaluation of RP systems and processes , 2004 .

[26]  Nandkumar Siraskar,et al.  Adaptive Slicing in Additive Manufacturing Process Using a Modified Boundary Octree Data Structure , 2015 .

[27]  Vito R. Gervasi,et al.  Geometry and procedure for benchmarking SFF and hybrid fabrication process resolution , 2005 .

[28]  M. Fiedler Algebraic connectivity of graphs , 1973 .

[29]  Yong Huang,et al.  Additive Manufacturing: Current State, Future Potential, Gaps and Needs, and Recommendations , 2015 .

[30]  D. Dimitrov,et al.  Investigating the achievable accuracy of three dimensional printing , 2006 .

[31]  Lihui Wang,et al.  Review: Advances in 3D data acquisition and processing for industrial applications , 2010 .

[32]  Gamal Weheba,et al.  Using response surface methodology to optimize the stereolithography process , 2006 .