System dynamics and organizational interventions

System dynamics models of organizational problems have been constructed since the 1950s. In the second half of the 1970s publications began appearing on explicit procedures to involve clients in the process of model construction. After about 30 years of applying and researching participative modelling approaches, it is useful to consider the extent to which these procedures have matured into a full-blown methodology. Does client involvement in system dynamics modelling yield repeatable results? Is the procedure adequately codified, or does its success depend on the experience and skills of the practitioner? Participative modelling is often associated with beneficial process results, such as consensus and participants' commitment to results. What evidence do we have that these ‘soft’ results actually materialize? Which conditions (types of interventions and client or problem characteristics) are especially favourable to these outcomes? The paper discusses these questions and closes with a set of topics relevant for further development of participative modelling and alternative strategies to study these topics. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  John D. Sterman,et al.  Bathtub dynamics: initial results of a systems thinking inventory , 2000 .

[2]  Jim Hines,et al.  The source of poor policy: controlling learning drift and premature consensus in human organizations , 2001 .

[3]  T. Cook,et al.  Quasi-experimentation: Design & analysis issues for field settings , 1979 .

[4]  Jac A. M. Vennix,et al.  Exploring influencing factors on rationality: A literature review of dynamic decision making studies in system dynamics , 2004 .

[5]  Marshall Scott Poole,et al.  Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Small Groups , 2004 .

[6]  Anne T. McCartt,et al.  Managerial Openness to Change and the Introduction of GDSS: Explaining Initial Success and Failure in Decision Conferencing , 1995 .

[7]  Michael J. Radzicki,et al.  Measuring Change in Mental Models of Dynamic Systems: An Exploratory Study , 1998 .

[8]  Robert O. Briggs,et al.  AIS Electronic Library (AISeL) , 2018 .

[9]  Uday S. Murthy,et al.  Divergent and Convergent Idea Generation in Teams: A Comparison of Computer-Mediated and Face-to-Face Communication , 2004 .

[10]  Anne T. McCartt,et al.  Evaluating group decision support system effectiveness: A performance study of decision conferencing , 1989, Decis. Support Syst..

[11]  Deepinder S. Bajwa,et al.  Adoption and use of electronic meeting systems to support task-oriented collaboration in large organizations in Australia and New Zealand , 2004 .

[12]  George P. Richardson,et al.  A framework for evaluating systems thinking interventions: an experimental approach to mental health system change , 1997 .

[13]  Geoff Coyle.  Rejoinder to Homer and Oliva , 2001 .

[14]  J. Valacich,et al.  Effects of anonymity and evaluative tone on idea generation in computer-mediated groups , 1990 .

[15]  Henk Akkermans,et al.  Clients' opinions on group model-building : an exploratory study , 1997 .

[16]  G. Stasser,et al.  Discovery of hidden profiles by decision-making groups: Solving a problem versus making a judgment. , 1992 .

[17]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  An Assessment of Group Support Systems Experimental Research: Methodology and Results , 1998, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[18]  John D. Sterman,et al.  Learning in and about complex systems , 1994 .

[19]  Kim Warren,et al.  Why has feedback systems thinking struggled to influence strategy and policy formulation? Suggestive evidence, explanations and solutions , 2004 .

[20]  David C. Lane,et al.  Rerum cognoscere causas: Part I — How do the ideas of system dynamics relate to traditional social theories and the voluntarism/determinism debate? , 2001 .

[21]  D. Schweiger,et al.  Building Commitment, Attachment, and Trust in Strategic Decision-Making Teams: The Role of Procedural Justice , 1995 .

[22]  Graham Pervan.  A review of research in Group Support Systems: leaders, approaches and directions , 1998, Decis. Support Syst..

[23]  Michael E. Holmes,et al.  Conflict management in a computer-supported meeting in a computer supported meeting environment , 1991 .

[24]  B. Richmond.  The Strategic Forum: aligning objectives, strategy and process , 1997 .

[25]  Jonathan Rosenhead,et al.  Problem structuring methods in action , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[26]  David C. Lane,et al.  Rerum cognoscere causas: Part II—Opportunities generated by the agency/structure debate and suggestions for clarifying the social theoretic position of system dynamics , 2001 .

[27]  David N. Ford,et al.  Mental models concepts for system dynamics research , 1998 .

[28]  J.M.I.M. Achterbergh,et al.  The social dimension of system dynamics‐based modelling , 2006 .

[29]  I. Ajzen.  Nature and operation of attitudes. , 2001, Annual review of psychology.

[30]  Colin Eden,et al.  On evaluating the performance of 'wide-band' GDSS's , 1995 .

[31]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  Group Support Systems: A Descriptive Evaluation of Case and Field Studies , 2000, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[32]  Aldo A. Zagonel,et al.  USING GROUP MODEL BUILDING TO INFORM WELFARE REFORM POLICY-MAKING IN NEW YORK STATE: A CRITICAL LOOK † , 2003 .

[33]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Capturing the Complexity in Advanced Technology Use: Adaptive Structuration Theory , 1994 .

[34]  Jac A. M. Vennix,et al.  Group model-building: tackling messy problems , 1999 .

[35]  John T. Cacioppo,et al.  The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion , 1986, Advances in Experimental Social Psychology.

[36]  John Rohrbaugh,et al.  A Spatial Model of Effectiveness Criteria: Towards a Competing Values Approach to Organizational Analysis , 1983 .

[37]  Eric F. Rietzschel,et al.  Productivity is not enough: A comparison of interactive and nominal brainstorming groups on idea generation and selection. , 2006 .

[38]  John D. W. Morecroft,et al.  Executive knowledge, models and learning , 1992 .

[39]  E. Brunswik.  Representative design and probabilistic theory in a functional psychology. , 1955, Psychological review.

[40]  James M. Lyneis,et al.  System dynamics for business strategy: a phased approach , 1999 .

[41]  Luis F. Luna-Reyes,et al.  Collecting and analyzing qualitative data for system dynamics: methods and models , 2003 .

[42]  G. Stasser,et al.  Pooling of Unshared Information in Group Decision Making: Biased Information Sampling During Discussion , 1985 .

[43]  Jac A. M. Vennix,et al.  Group model‐building to facilitate organizational change: an exploratory study , 1996 .

[44]  George P. Richardson,et al.  Scripts for group model building , 1997 .

[45]  George P. Richardson,et al.  Group model building: adding more science to the craft , 1997 .

[46]  Bongsik Shin,et al.  The Dynamic Effects of Group Support Systems on Group Meetings , 2002, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[47]  Valerie Belton,et al.  Technology-driven and model-driven approaches to group decision support: focus, research philosophy, and key concepts , 2003, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[48]  Graham Winch,et al.  Flexible study processes in ‘knotty’ system dynamics projects , 2006 .

[49]  J.A.M. Vennix,et al.  Group model building: what does the client think of it now? , 2000 .

[50]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Collaboration Engineering with ThinkLets to Pursue Sustained Success with Group Support Systems , 2003, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[51]  Deborah Campbell,et al.  The long and winding (and frequently bumpy) road to successful client engagement: one team's journey , 2001 .

[52]  Geoff Coyle,et al.  Qualitative and quantitative modelling in system dynamics: some research questions , 2000 .

[53]  Jac A. M. Vennix,et al.  Group Model Building: A Decision Room Approach , 2000 .

[54]  John Mingers,et al.  Variety is the spice of life: combining soft and hard OR/MS methods , 2000 .

[55]  George P. Richardson,et al.  Foreword: Group model building, art, and science , 1997 .

[56]  Jac A. M. Vennix,et al.  Group model building effectiveness: a review of assessment studies † , 2002 .

[57]  I. Ajzen.  The theory of planned behavior , 1991 .

[58]  G. Alliger,et al.  KIRKPATRICK'S LEVELS OF TRAINING CRITERIA: THIRTY YEARS LATER , 1989 .

[59]  Rogelio Oliva,et al.  Maps and models in system dynamics: a response to Coyle , 2001, System Dynamics Review.

[60]  L. D. Verburgh,et al.  Participative policy modelling: applied to the health care insurance industry , 1994 .

[61]  Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa,et al.  Computer support of groups: theory-based models for GDSS research , 1991 .

[62]  George P. Richardson,et al.  Foundations of Mental Model Research , 1994 .

[63]  Alan R. Dennis,et al.  Understanding Fit and Appropriation Effects in Group Support Systems via Meta-Analysis , 2001, MIS Q..

[64]  J. Benders,et al.  Contested commodification: Consultancies and their struggle with new concept development , 2005 .