Revealed Parking Choices and the Value of Time

This study uses 2005–2006 University of Wisconsin–Madison (UW–Madison) parking applications to model lot choice in terms of parking prices and walking distances and to determine how parkers value their walking times. UW–Madison employees apply for annual lot parking permits each year by ranking as many as four lots; the employees know that the highest ranked lot with available space will be offered to them. Parking choices are modeled as functions of walking distances, lot prices, and department priority indexes that reflect income, seniority, and status. The sample consists of 4,032 employees who work in 150 campus buildings and park in more than 60 lots. Lot prices vary from $435 to $1,025 per year, and walking distances from workplaces to lots range from a few feet to nearly 2 mi. The results are consistent across specifications. The estimated values of walking time vary from less than $4/h for low-status employees parking in low-priced lots to more than $30/h for high-status employees in high-priced lots. Choice is relatively inelastic regarding distance and more elastic regarding price. Choice models are used to estimate the effects of two price changes: (a) a single $650 annual lot price and (b) a $250 increase for all prices.

[1]  D. Hensher,et al.  Parking Demand and Responsiveness to Supply, Pricing and Location in the Sydney Central Business District , 2001 .

[2]  André de Palma,et al.  A Temporal and Spatial Equilibrium Analysis of Commuter Parking , 1991 .

[3]  Peter O. Barnard,et al.  THE ROLE OF STATED PREFERENCE METHODS IN STUDIES OF TRAVEL CHOICE , 1987 .

[4]  S Teply,et al.  A nested logit model of parking location choice , 1993 .

[5]  Moshe Ben-Akiva,et al.  Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand , 1985 .

[6]  K. Axhausen,et al.  Choice of parking: Stated preference approach , 1991 .

[7]  Moshe Ben-Akiva,et al.  Analysis of the reliability of preference ranking data , 1991 .

[8]  Ronnie Schöb,et al.  Alleviating Urban Traffic Congestion , 2005 .

[9]  R H Pratt,et al.  TRAVELER RESPONSE TO TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM CHANGES. CHAPTER 10 - BUS ROUTING AND COVERAGE , 2004 .

[10]  John M. Rose,et al.  Applied Choice Analysis: List of tables , 2005 .

[11]  John Bates,et al.  ECONOMETRIC ISSUES IN STATED PREFERENCE ANALYSIS , 1988 .

[12]  D. Shoup The High Cost of Free Parking , 1997 .

[13]  John M. Rose,et al.  Applied Choice Analysis: List of tables , 2005 .

[14]  D A Hensher BUILDING A RESEARCH BASE IN TOURISM: SOME LESSONS AND CHALLENGES IN THE FIELD OF STATED PREFERENCE ANALYSIS OF TRAVEL CHOICES , 1993 .

[15]  J R Kuzmyak,et al.  TRAVELER RESPONSE TO TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM CHANGES. CHAPTER 13 - PARKING PRICING AND FEES , 2005 .

[16]  D.P.J. van der Goot A model to describe the choice of parking places , 1982 .

[17]  D. Gillen,et al.  Alternative Policy Variables to Influence Urban Transport Demand , 1977 .

[18]  David Gillen,et al.  Parking location and transit demand: A case study of endogenous attributes in disaggregate mode choice models☆ , 1978 .

[19]  Randall G. Chapaaan,et al.  Exploiting Rank Ordered Choice Set Data within the Stochastic Utility Model , 1982 .

[20]  John R. Meyer,et al.  The Urban Transportation Problem , 1965 .

[21]  E. Segelhorst,et al.  PARKING BIAS IN TRANSIT CHOICE , 1973 .

[22]  Peter Congdon,et al.  Applied Bayesian Modelling , 2003 .

[23]  Kenneth E. Train,et al.  Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation , 2016 .

[24]  Mark Wardman,et al.  A COMPARISON OF REVEALED PREFERENCE AND STATED PREFERENCE MODELS OF TRAVEL BEHAVIOUR , 1988 .