CT Colonography (Virtual Colonoscopy): Technique, Indications and Performance

Worldwide, colorectal cancer is the third most frequent cancer occurring in both sexes. Screening programs for early detection enable detection of tumors at an earlier stage and have been shown to reduce death rate. Currently, colonoscopy is the investigation of choice for colorectal cancer screening and for investigation of patients with suspected colorectal cancer. However, colonoscopy remains an invasive technique requiring anesthesia, with a risk of perforation and bleeding. In addition, even experienced colonoscopists may be unable to complete the colonoscopy due to multiple reasons such as severe diverticulosis, stricture, obstructing mass, or fixation of colonic loops. CT colonography, also known as virtual colonoscopy, is a relatively new technique that is becoming increasingly popular. The technical aspects, indications, advantages and diagnostic performance of this technique are briefly reviewed.

[1]  R. Sievert,et al.  Book Reviews : Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection (as amended 1959 and revised 1962). I.C.R.P. Publication 6. 70 pp. PERGAMON PRESS. Oxford, London and New York, 1964. £1 5s. 0d. [TB/54] , 1964 .

[2]  N. Dubrawsky Cancer statistics , 1989, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[3]  D. Ransohoff,et al.  Screening for colorectal cancer. , 1991, The New England journal of medicine.

[4]  G. Norman,et al.  Pain following colonoscopy: elimination with carbon dioxide. , 1992, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[5]  J. Hardcastle,et al.  Colorectal cancer , 1993, Europe Against Cancer European Commission Series for General Practitioners.

[6]  P. Wingo,et al.  Cancer statistics, 1996 , 1996, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[7]  D. Rex,et al.  Colonoscopic miss rates of adenomas determined by back-to-back colonoscopies. , 1997, Gastroenterology.

[8]  R. Ehman,et al.  Reducing data size and radiation dose for CT colonography. , 1997, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[9]  A. Fichera,et al.  Incidence and therapeutic implications of synchronous colonic pathology in colorectal adenocarcinoma. , 1997, Surgery.

[10]  C F Beaulieu,et al.  Detection of colonic polyps in a phantom model: implications for virtual colonoscopy data acquisition. , 1998, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[11]  K R Hoffmann,et al.  CT colonography with three-dimensional problem solving for detection of colonic polyps. , 1998, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[12]  J. Ferrucci,et al.  A comparison of virtual and conventional colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal polyps. , 1999, The New England journal of medicine.

[13]  J R Hecht,et al.  CT colonography: value of scanning in both the supine and prone positions. , 1999, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[14]  M. Macari,et al.  Usefulness of CT colonography in patients with incomplete colonoscopy. , 1999, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[15]  S. Goldberg,et al.  Endoluminal CT colonography after an incomplete endoscopic colonoscopy. , 1999, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[16]  J. Healy,et al.  A prospective single centre study comparing computed tomography pneumocolon against colonoscopy in the detection of colorectal neoplasms , 2000, Gut.

[17]  E T Stewart,et al.  A comparison of colonoscopy and double-contrast barium enema for surveillance after polypectomy. National Polyp Study Work Group. , 2000, The New England journal of medicine.

[18]  J. Kruskal,et al.  Utility of intravenously administered contrast material at CT colonography. , 2000, Radiology.

[19]  A. Hara,et al.  Incidental extracolonic findings at CT colonography. , 2000, Radiology.

[20]  M. Macari,et al.  Comparison of time-efficient CT colonography with two- and three-dimensional colonic evaluation for detecting colorectal polyps. , 2000, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[21]  J G Fletcher,et al.  Optimization of CT colonography technique: prospective trial in 180 patients. , 2000, Radiology.

[22]  P Schnyder,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy and interobserver agreement of CT colonography (virtual colonoscopy) , 2000, Gut.

[23]  J. Ferrucci,et al.  Colon cancer screening with virtual colonoscopy: promise, polyps, politics. , 2001, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[24]  M. Macari,et al.  Effect of different bowel preparations on residual fluid at CT colonography. , 2001, Radiology.

[25]  C H McCollough,et al.  CT colonography: single- versus multi-detector row imaging. , 2001, Radiology.

[26]  L. Påhlman,et al.  The impact of endoscopists' experience and learning curves and interendoscopist variation on colonoscopy completion rates. , 2001, Endoscopy.

[27]  J G Fletcher,et al.  CT colonography without cathartic preparation: feasibility study. , 2001, Radiology.

[28]  S D Wall,et al.  Colorectal neoplasia: performance characteristics of CT colonography for detection in 300 patients. , 2001, Radiology.

[29]  G. Spinzi,et al.  Computed tomographic colonography and conventional colonoscopy for colon diseases: a prospective, blinded study , 2001, American Journal of Gastroenterology.

[30]  J. Yee CT colonography: examination prerequisites , 2002, Abdominal Imaging.

[31]  J G Fletcher,et al.  Contrast-enhanced CT colonography in recurrent colorectal carcinoma: feasibility of simultaneous evaluation for metastatic disease, local recurrence, and metachronous neoplasia in colorectal carcinoma. , 2002, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[32]  Carlo Catalano,et al.  Detection of colorectal lesions with virtual computed tomographic colonography. , 2002, American journal of surgery.

[33]  J. Malley,et al.  Colonic polyps: complementary role of computer-aided detection in CT colonography. , 2002, Radiology.

[34]  E. Neri,et al.  Colorectal cancer: role of CT colonography in preoperative evaluation after incomplete colonoscopy. , 2002, Radiology.

[35]  Jonathan B. Kruskal,et al.  CT colonography: colonic distention improved by dual positioning but not intravenous glucagon , 2002, European Radiology.

[36]  Michael Pignone,et al.  Cost-Effectiveness Analyses of Colorectal Cancer Screening , 2002, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[37]  Corinne A Tipker,et al.  CT colonography at different radiation dose levels: feasibility of dose reduction. , 2002, Radiology.

[38]  C. Catalano,et al.  Computed Tomographic Colonography (Virtual Colonoscopy): Blinded Prospective Comparison with Conventional Colonoscopy for the Detection of Colorectal Neoplasia , 2002, Endoscopy.

[39]  Marc Baekelandt,et al.  Dietary fecal tagging as a cleansing method before CT colonography: initial results polyp detection and patient acceptance. , 2002, Radiology.

[40]  R. Meuli,et al.  Performance of multidetector computed tomography colonography compared with conventional colonoscopy , 2002, Gut.

[41]  M. Macari,et al.  Colorectal neoplasms: prospective comparison of thin-section low-dose multi-detector row CT colonography and conventional colonoscopy for detection. , 2002, Radiology.

[42]  Y. Masutani,et al.  Computerized detection of colonic polyps at CT colonography on the basis of volumetric features: pilot study. , 2002, Radiology.

[43]  Rubem Pochaczevsky,et al.  Digital subtraction bowel cleansing in CT colonography. , 2002, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[44]  P. Pickhardt,et al.  Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults. , 2003, The New England journal of medicine.

[45]  J. Terdiman,et al.  Colorectal cancer screening: scientific review. , 2003, JAMA.

[46]  P. Lavin,et al.  CT colonography of colorectal polyps: a metaanalysis. , 2003, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[47]  A. Jemal,et al.  Cancer Statistics, 2004 , 2004, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[48]  Robert H Fletcher,et al.  Virtual colonoscopy detected colorectal polyps in asymptomatic patients with average risk of colorectal neoplasia , 2004, ACP journal club.

[49]  J. Saurin,et al.  [Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults]. , 2004, Gastroenterologie clinique et biologique.

[50]  J. Burdick,et al.  Computed tomographic colonography (virtual colonoscopy): a multicenter comparison with standard colonoscopy for detection of colorectal neoplasia. , 2004, JAMA.

[51]  J. Bond Progress in refining virtual colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening. , 2005, Gastroenterology.

[52]  C. Catalano,et al.  Colorectal polyps: detection with low-dose multi-detector row helical CT colonography versus two sequential colonoscopies. , 2005, Radiology.

[53]  J. Jackson,et al.  Meta-Analysis: Computed Tomographic Colonography , 2005, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[54]  J. Sosna,et al.  Extracolonic findings at CT colonography , 2005, Abdominal Imaging.

[55]  Michael Macari,et al.  CT colonography: where have we been and where are we going? , 2005, Radiology.

[56]  I. Bitter,et al.  Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy computer-aided polyp detection in a screening population. , 2005, Gastroenterology.

[57]  E. Paulson,et al.  Analysis of air contrast barium enema, computed tomographic colonography, and colonoscopy: prospective comparison , 2005, The Lancet.

[58]  Stuart A. Taylor,et al.  CT colonography in the detection of colorectal polyps and cancer: systematic review, meta-analysis, and proposed minimum data set for study level reporting. , 2005, Radiology.

[59]  Steve Halligan,et al.  Potentially serious adverse events at CT colonography in symptomatic patients: national survey of the United Kingdom. , 2006, Radiology.

[60]  Jacob Sosna,et al.  Colonic perforation at CT colonography: assessment of risk in a multicenter large cohort. , 2006, Radiology.

[61]  C. Becker,et al.  Dose reduction and image quality in MDCT colonography using tube current modulation. , 2006, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[62]  Jyotsna Shah Potentially Serious Adverse Events at CT Colonography in Symptomatic Patients: National Survey of the United KingdomBurling D, Halligan S, Slater A, et al (Univ College Hosp, London) Radiology 239:464–471, 2006§ , 2007 .

[63]  Jacob Sosna,et al.  CT colonography in 546 patients with incomplete colonoscopy. , 2007, Radiology.

[64]  C. Herold,et al.  Pitfalls in multi-detector row CT colonography: a systematic approach. , 2007, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[65]  D. Lieberman,et al.  Clinical practice. Screening for colorectal cancer. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.