The Learning Styles of Undergraduate Students in CM Bachelor’s Degree Programs in the U.S.

ABSTRACT This article presents the findings of a study analyzing the learning styles of undergraduate construction management (CM) students in bachelor’s degree programs in the United States. The study utilized the Felder-Silverman model and the Index of Learning Styles (ILS) as a survey instrument. The survey population consisted of 1,069 CM students from 36 university CM programs across the Associated Schools of Construction regions. Demographic information, the raw ILS responses, and the ILS web-based survey report were collected from the students. The results were analyzed and compared to both the CM students themselves and to similar studies done with engineering students. It was found that CM students were visual, active, sensing, and sequential learners. This study provides recommendations for how CM instructors might align their teaching styles with CM-student learning styles, and discusses impacts on the CM industry.

[1]  Leonhard E. Bernold,et al.  Impact of Holistic and Learning‐Oriented Teaching on Academic Success , 2000 .

[2]  D. Kolb,et al.  Experiential Learning Theory: Previous Research and New Directions , 2000 .

[3]  R. Felder,et al.  Applications, Reliability and Validity of the Index of Learning Styles* , 2005 .

[4]  Scott Glick,et al.  Participation in Construction Management Student Competitions: Perceived Positive and Negative Effects , 2013 .

[5]  Leonhard E. Bernold.  Teaching Evaluations for Construction Engineering and Management: Opportunity to Move Us Forward , 2007 .

[6]  Mark Shaurette,et al.  Establishing New Graduate Competencies: Ensuring that Construction Management Curriculums are Delivering "Job-Ready" Employees , 2011 .

[7]  Kathryn Davies,et al.  Toward a Learning-Styles Profile of Construction Students: Results from New Zealand , 2007 .

[8]  M. Zywno.  A Contribution to Validation of Score Meaning for Felder- Soloman's Index of Learning Styles , 2003 .

[9]  Tariq S. Abdelhamid,et al.  Evaluation of teacher-student learning style disparity in construction management education , 2003 .

[10]  Giuseppe Cagni,et al.  AIR in Lombardia , 2004 .

[11]  Andersen Nn,et al.  Performance Outcomes: An Integral Component of Program Assessment , 1998 .

[12]  Amm Liu,et al.  Research Methods for Construction (3rd ed.) , 2008 .

[13]  Paul Lin,et al.  Learning Styles of Engineering Technology and Engineering Students: Pedagogical Implication , 2008 .

[14]  Mehmet Emre Bayraktar,et al.  Improving Green Building Education by Addressing the Learning Style and Prior Knowledge of Students , 2011 .

[15]  A. Merkouris,et al.  Learning styles and critical thinking relationship in baccalaureate nursing education: a systematic review. , 2014, Nurse education today.

[16]  R. Felder,et al.  Understanding Student Differences , 2005 .

[17]  Sang Ha Lee,et al.  A Psychometric Study of the Index of Learning Styles© , 2007 .

[18]  F. Coffield.  Learning styles and pedagogy in post-16 learning: a systematic and critical review , 2004 .

[19]  R. Felder,et al.  Learning and Teaching Styles in Engineering Education. , 1988 .

[20]  D. Kolb.  Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development , 1983 .

[21]  Saïd Assar,et al.  Student Learning Styles Adaptation Method Based on Teaching Strategies and Electronic Media , 2008, 2008 Eighth IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies.

[22]  R. Felder.  Reaching the Second Tier--Learning and Teaching Styles in College Science Education. , 1993 .

[23]  Leonhard E. Bernold.  Paradigm Shift in Construction Education is Vital for the Future of Our Profession , 2005 .