Computational simulation of transcranial current stimulation: Based on an image-derived head model

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been applied in numerous brain and neurological studies over recent years. However, the understand about the mechanisms of tDCS is limited. This paper presents the method to obtain a realistic CT imaging-derived finite element computional model through reverse engineering. The model can be used to analyze the distributions of electric field in tDCS with different electrode configuration. Based on the model, current density distributions of tDCS with two different size of electrodes were calculated to compare the focality and stimulation depth. The results shows that high current density were found under the electrodes, and electrode configuration effects current density distribution significantly. The conclusion may guide the optimization of tDCS parameters for clinical applications.

[1]  D. Reato,et al.  Gyri-precise head model of transcranial direct current stimulation: Improved spatial focality using a ring electrode versus conventional rectangular pad , 2009, Brain Stimulation.

[2]  Sergio P. Rigonatti,et al.  Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation of prefrontal cortex enhances working memory , 2005, Experimental Brain Research.

[3]  Socrates Dokos,et al.  A computational modelling study of transcranial direct current stimulation montages used in depression , 2014, NeuroImage.

[4]  Abhishek Datta,et al.  Cranial electrotherapy stimulation and transcranial pulsed current stimulation: A computer based high-resolution modeling study , 2013, NeuroImage.

[5]  M. Bikson,et al.  Transcranial current stimulation focality using disc and ring electrode configurations: FEM analysis , 2008, Journal of neural engineering.

[6]  Abhishek Datta,et al.  Focal modulation of the primary motor cortex in fibromyalgia using 4×1-ring high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS): immediate and delayed analgesic effects of cathodal and anodal stimulation. , 2013, The journal of pain : official journal of the American Pain Society.

[7]  Felix M Mottaghy,et al.  Noninvasive brain stimulation with transcranial magnetic or direct current stimulation (TMS/tDCS)-From insights into human memory to therapy of its dysfunction. , 2008, Methods.

[8]  C. Herrmann,et al.  Transcranial alternating current stimulation: a review of the underlying mechanisms and modulation of cognitive processes , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[9]  M. Bikson,et al.  Computational Models of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation , 2012, Clinical EEG and neuroscience.

[10]  Giulio Ruffini,et al.  The electric field in the cortex during transcranial current stimulation , 2013, NeuroImage.

[11]  M. Bikson,et al.  Electrode montages for tDCS and weak transcranial electrical stimulation: Role of “return” electrode’s position and size , 2010, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[12]  M. Bikson,et al.  Methods to focalize noninvasive electrical brain stimulation: principles and future clinical development for the treatment of pain , 2013, Expert review of neurotherapeutics.

[13]  Rosalind J. Sadleir,et al.  Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in a realistic head model , 2010, NeuroImage.

[14]  Abhishek Datta,et al.  Electrical Stimulation of Brain using a realistic 3D Human Head Model: Improvement of Spatial Focality , 2008 .

[15]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation , 2000, The Journal of physiology.

[16]  L. Merabet,et al.  Clinical research with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS): Challenges and future directions , 2012, Brain Stimulation.

[17]  Abhishek Datta,et al.  Guidelines for precise and accurate computational models of tDCS , 2012, Brain Stimulation.