Role of the supplementary motor area in auditory sensory attenuation

Self-generated tones elicit smaller brain responses as compared to externally generated tones. This phenomenon known as sensory attenuation has been explained in terms of an internal forward model in which the brain predicts the upcoming events and thereby attenuates the sensory processing. Such prediction processes have been suggested to occur via an efference copy of the motor command that is sent from the motor system to the lower order sensory cortex. However, little is known about how the prediction is implemented in the brain’s network organization. Because the supplementary motor area (SMA) is a primary brain structure of the motor system, we attributed the implementation of the prediction to the SMA. To address this question, we examined generative network models for auditory ERPs. ERPs were evoked by either a self-generated or externally generated tone, while subjects were paying attention to their motor action or to the tone. The tone itself was the same throughout all conditions. The network models consisted of three subsets embedding alternative hypotheses of the hierarchical structures: (1) auditory fields of the temporal lobe, (2) adding connections to the SMA, and (3) adding prediction signal to the SMA. The model comparison revealed that all ERP responses were mediated by the network connections across the auditory cortex and the SMA. Importantly, the prediction signal to the SMA was required when the tone was self-generated irrespective of the attention factor, whereas the externally generated tone did not require the prediction. We discussed these results in the context of the predictive coding framework.

[1]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Preserved Feedforward But Impaired Top-Down Processes in the Vegetative State , 2011, Science.

[2]  E. Schröger,et al.  Suppression of the auditory N1 event-related potential component with unpredictable self-initiated tones: evidence for internal forward models with dynamic stimulation. , 2008, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[3]  E. Schröger,et al.  Selective suppression of self-initiated sounds in an auditory stream: An ERP study. , 2011, Psychophysiology.

[4]  D. Wegner,et al.  When moving without volition: Implied self-causation enhances binding strength between involuntary actions and effects , 2012, Consciousness and Cognition.

[5]  P. Haggard,et al.  Disrupting the experience of control in the human brain: pre-supplementary motor area contributes to the sense of agency , 2010, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[6]  P. Haggard,et al.  Awareness of action: Inference and prediction , 2008, Consciousness and Cognition.

[7]  B. Libet,et al.  Time of conscious intention to act in relation to onset of cerebral activity (readiness-potential). The unconscious initiation of a freely voluntary act. , 1983 .

[8]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Multiple sparse priors for the M/EEG inverse problem , 2008, NeuroImage.

[9]  Erich Schröger,et al.  Motor Intention Determines Sensory Attenuation of Brain Responses to Self-initiated Sounds , 2014, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[10]  M. Hallett,et al.  Mesial motor areas in self-initiated versus externally triggered movements examined with fMRI: effect of movement type and rate. , 1999, Journal of neurophysiology.

[11]  W PENFIELD,et al.  The supplementary motor area of the cerebral cortex; a clinical and experimental study. , 1951, A.M.A. archives of neurology and psychiatry.

[12]  Andreas Wohlschläger,et al.  Intentions and expectations in temporal binding , 2007, Consciousness and Cognition.

[13]  Hartwig R. Siebner,et al.  Cue integration and the perception of action in intentional binding , 2013, Experimental Brain Research.

[14]  E. Schafer,et al.  Self-stimulation alters human sensory brain responses. , 1974, Science.

[15]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Dynamic causal modeling of evoked responses in EEG and MEG , 2006, NeuroImage.

[16]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Ten simple rules for dynamic causal modeling , 2010, NeuroImage.

[17]  R. Henson,et al.  Silent Expectations: Dynamic Causal Modeling of Cortical Prediction and Attention to Sounds That Weren't , 2016, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[18]  Ford,et al.  Do That ? Abnormal Predictive Processes in Schizophrenia When Button , 2014 .

[19]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Comparing Families of Dynamic Causal Models , 2010, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[20]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  A theory of cortical responses , 2005, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[21]  B. Libet,et al.  Time of conscious intention to act in relation to onset of cerebral activity (readiness-potential). The unconscious initiation of a freely voluntary act. , 1983, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[22]  César F. Lima,et al.  Roles of Supplementary Motor Areas in Auditory Processing and Auditory Imagery , 2016, Trends in Neurosciences.

[23]  M. Garrido,et al.  Sensory prediction errors in the continuum of psychosis , 2018, Schizophrenia Research.

[24]  D. Wolpert,et al.  Why can't you tickle yourself? , 2000, Neuroreport.

[25]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  The mismatch negativity: A review of underlying mechanisms , 2009, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[26]  Arnaud Delorme,et al.  EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis , 2004, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[27]  Ben H. Jansen,et al.  Electroencephalogram and visual evoked potential generation in a mathematical model of coupled cortical columns , 1995, Biological Cybernetics.

[28]  R. Hari,et al.  Suppressed responses to self-triggered sounds in the human auditory cortex. , 2004, Cerebral cortex.

[29]  Erich Schröger,et al.  Sensorial suppression of self-generated sounds and its dependence on attention. , 2013, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[30]  C. Bellebaum,et al.  ERP correlates of processing the auditory consequences of own versus observed actions. , 2018, Psychophysiology.

[31]  Erich Schröger,et al.  The N1-suppression effect for self-initiated sounds is independent of attention , 2012, BMC Neuroscience.

[32]  Zoubin Ghahramani,et al.  Computational principles of movement neuroscience , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[33]  C. Kennard,et al.  Functional role of the supplementary and pre-supplementary motor areas , 2008, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[34]  R. Passingham,et al.  Attention to Intention , 2004, Science.

[35]  G. McCarthy,et al.  Functional organization of human supplementary motor cortex studied by electrical stimulation , 1991, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[36]  P. Haggard,et al.  Voluntary action and conscious awareness , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[37]  T. Hinterberger,et al.  The readiness potential reflects intentional binding , 2014, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[38]  T. Hinterberger,et al.  ‘Catching the waves’ – slow cortical potentials as moderator of voluntary action , 2016, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[39]  P. Morosan,et al.  Probabilistic Mapping and Volume Measurement of Human Primary Auditory Cortex , 2001, NeuroImage.

[40]  M. Hallett,et al.  What is the Bereitschaftspotential? , 2006, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[41]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  A neural mass model for MEG/EEG: coupling and neuronal dynamics , 2003, NeuroImage.

[42]  Ori Ossmy,et al.  Enhanced Auditory Evoked Activity to Self-Generated Sounds Is Mediated by Primary and Supplementary Motor Cortices , 2015, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[43]  Ross Cunnington,et al.  Implicit Agency in Observed Actions: Evidence for N1 Suppression of Tones Caused by Self-made and Observed Actions , 2015, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[44]  E. Schröger,et al.  Differential Contribution of Frontal and Temporal Cortices to Auditory Change Detection: fMRI and ERP Results , 2002, NeuroImage.

[45]  Holly N. Phillips,et al.  Hierarchical Organization of Frontotemporal Networks for the Prediction of Stimuli across Multiple Dimensions , 2015, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[46]  Katrin Amunts,et al.  Cytoarchitecture, probability maps, and functions of the human supplementary and pre-supplementary motor areas , 2018, Brain Structure and Function.

[47]  R. Näätänen,et al.  Auditory frequency discrimination and event-related potentials. , 1985, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.