Application-Motivated, Holistic Benchmarking of a Full Quantum Computing Stack
暂无分享,去创建一个
Ross Duncan | Travis L. Scholten | Seyon Sivarajah | Daniel Mills | R. Duncan | Daniel Mills | Seyon Sivarajah | Ross Duncan
[1] Ross Duncan,et al. On the qubit routing problem , 2019, TQC.
[2] F. Jin,et al. Benchmarking the quantum approximate optimization algorithm , 2019, Quantum Inf. Process..
[3] Kathleen E. Hamilton,et al. Error-mitigated data-driven circuit learning on noisy quantum hardware , 2019, Quantum Mach. Intell..
[4] Kathleen E. Hamilton,et al. Generative model benchmarks for superconducting qubits , 2018, Physical Review A.
[5] Margaret Martonosi,et al. Software Mitigation of Crosstalk on Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum Computers , 2019, ASPLOS.
[6] Andrew W. Cross,et al. Validating quantum computers using randomized model circuits , 2018, Physical Review A.
[7] Dmitri Maslov,et al. Experimental comparison of two quantum computing architectures , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[8] E. Knill,et al. Randomized Benchmarking of Quantum Gates , 2007, 0707.0963.
[9] Peter D. Johnson,et al. Expressibility and Entangling Capability of Parameterized Quantum Circuits for Hybrid Quantum‐Classical Algorithms , 2019, Advanced Quantum Technologies.
[10] F. Brandão,et al. Local random quantum circuits are approximate polynomial-designs: numerical results , 2012, 1208.0692.
[11] Rupak Biswas,et al. A flexible high-performance simulator for verifying and benchmarking quantum circuits implemented on real hardware , 2018, npj Quantum Information.
[12] R. Jozsa,et al. Classical simulation of commuting quantum computations implies collapse of the polynomial hierarchy , 2010, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.
[13] Urmila Mahadev,et al. Classical Verification of Quantum Computations , 2018, 2018 IEEE 59th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS).
[14] Christopher N. Warren,et al. Improved Success Probability with Greater Circuit Depth for the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm , 2019, Physical Review Applied.
[15] Travis S. Humble,et al. XACC: a system-level software infrastructure for heterogeneous quantum–classical computing , 2019, Quantum Science and Technology.
[16] Hans-J. Briegel,et al. Machine learning \& artificial intelligence in the quantum domain , 2017, ArXiv.
[17] Ross Duncan,et al. Optimising Clifford Circuits with Quantomatic , 2019, QPL.
[18] Elham Kashefi,et al. Methods for classically simulating noisy networked quantum architectures , 2018, Quantum Science and Technology.
[19] Elham Kashefi,et al. The Born supremacy: quantum advantage and training of an Ising Born machine , 2019, npj Quantum Information.
[20] Jayadev Misra,et al. A Constructive Proof of Vizing's Theorem , 1992, Inf. Process. Lett..
[21] Andrew W. Cross,et al. Correlated randomized benchmarking , 2018, 2003.02354.
[22] Jérôme F Gonthier,et al. An application benchmark for fermionic quantum simulations. , 2020, 2003.01862.
[23] Tyler Y Takeshita,et al. Hartree-Fock on a superconducting qubit quantum computer , 2020, Science.
[24] Jay M. Gambetta,et al. Process verification of two-qubit quantum gates by randomized benchmarking , 2012, 1210.7011.
[25] R. Cleve,et al. Efficient Quantum Algorithms for Simulating Sparse Hamiltonians , 2005, quant-ph/0508139.
[26] Valeria Saggio,et al. Cross-verification of independent quantum devices , 2019, 2021 Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics Europe & European Quantum Electronics Conference (CLEO/Europe-EQEC).
[27] Margaret Martonosi,et al. Full-Stack, Real-System Quantum Computer Studies: Architectural Comparisons and Design Insights , 2019, 2019 ACM/IEEE 46th Annual International Symposium on Computer Architecture (ISCA).
[28] Elham Kashefi,et al. Verification of Quantum Computation: An Overview of Existing Approaches , 2017, Theory of Computing Systems.
[29] Simon J. Devitt,et al. Performing Quantum Computing Experiments in the Cloud , 2016, 1605.05709.
[30] Ivano Tavernelli,et al. Quantum algorithms for electronic structure calculations: Particle-hole Hamiltonian and optimized wave-function expansions , 2018, Physical Review A.
[31] Aram W. Harrow,et al. Quantum computational supremacy , 2017, Nature.
[32] Chen-Fu Chiang,et al. Scaffold: Quantum Programming Language , 2012 .
[33] Robin Blume-Kohout,et al. Direct Randomized Benchmarking for Multiqubit Devices. , 2018, Physical review letters.
[34] Andrew W. Cross,et al. Topological and Subsystem Codes on Low-Degree Graphs with Flag Qubits , 2019, Physical Review X.
[35] Jay M. Gambetta,et al. Characterizing Quantum Gates via Randomized Benchmarking , 2011, 1109.6887.
[36] Dacheng Tao,et al. The Expressive Power of Parameterized Quantum Circuits , 2018, ArXiv.
[37] Ryan LaRose,et al. Quantum-assisted quantum compiling , 2018, Quantum.
[38] Robin Blume-Kohout,et al. A volumetric framework for quantum computer benchmarks , 2019, Quantum.
[39] Joel J. Wallman,et al. Noise tailoring for scalable quantum computation via randomized compiling , 2015, 1512.01098.
[40] B. Recht,et al. Efficient discrete approximations of quantum gates , 2001, quant-ph/0111031.
[41] Sarah Sheldon,et al. Three-Qubit Randomized Benchmarking. , 2017, Physical review letters.
[42] Ashley Montanaro,et al. Achieving quantum supremacy with sparse and noisy commuting quantum computations , 2016, 1610.01808.
[43] Scott Aaronson,et al. The computational complexity of linear optics , 2010, STOC '11.
[44] Joseph Emerson,et al. Scalable and robust randomized benchmarking of quantum processes. , 2010, Physical review letters.
[45] C. Porter,et al. Fluctuations of Nuclear Reaction Widths , 1956 .
[46] J. Eisert,et al. Architectures for quantum simulation showing a quantum speedup , 2017, 1703.00466.
[47] R. Pooser,et al. Cloud Quantum Computing of an Atomic Nucleus. , 2018, Physical Review Letters.
[48] Anton Frisk Kockum,et al. Quantum approximate optimization of the exact-cover problem on a superconducting quantum processor , 2019, 1912.10495.
[49] Travis S. Humble,et al. Quantum chemistry as a benchmark for near-term quantum computers , 2019, npj Quantum Information.
[50] Kristan Temme,et al. Supervised learning with quantum-enhanced feature spaces , 2018, Nature.
[51] John A. Gunnels,et al. Leveraging Secondary Storage to Simulate Deep 54-qubit Sycamore Circuits , 2019, 1910.09534.
[52] Margaret Martonosi,et al. Noise-Adaptive Compiler Mappings for Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum Computers , 2019, ASPLOS.
[53] D. Bacon,et al. Quantum approximate optimization of non-planar graph problems on a planar superconducting processor , 2020, Nature Physics.
[54] Thierry Paul,et al. Quantum computation and quantum information , 2007, Mathematical Structures in Computer Science.
[55] Margaret Martonosi,et al. ScaffCC: Scalable compilation and analysis of quantum programs , 2015, Parallel Comput..
[56] Margaret Martonosi,et al. ScaffCC: a framework for compilation and analysis of quantum computing programs , 2014, Conf. Computing Frontiers.
[57] H Neven,et al. A blueprint for demonstrating quantum supremacy with superconducting qubits , 2017, Science.
[58] Koen Bertels,et al. Evaluation of Parameterized Quantum Circuits: on the design, and the relation between classification accuracy, expressibility and entangling capability , 2020, ArXiv.
[59] J. Gambetta,et al. Hardware-efficient variational quantum eigensolver for small molecules and quantum magnets , 2017, Nature.
[60] Seth Lloyd,et al. Pseudo-Random Unitary Operators for Quantum Information Processing , 2003, Science.
[61] Jack J. Dongarra,et al. The LINPACK Benchmark: past, present and future , 2003, Concurr. Comput. Pract. Exp..
[62] William J. Zeng,et al. A Practical Quantum Instruction Set Architecture , 2016, ArXiv.
[63] Travis S. Humble,et al. Establishing the quantum supremacy frontier with a 281 Pflop/s simulation , 2019, Quantum Science and Technology.
[64] J. McClean,et al. Strategies for quantum computing molecular energies using the unitary coupled cluster ansatz , 2017, Quantum Science and Technology.
[65] Richard J. Lipton,et al. Some connections between nonuniform and uniform complexity classes , 1980, STOC '80.
[66] Peter J. Karalekas,et al. A quantum-classical cloud platform optimized for variational hybrid algorithms , 2020, Quantum Science and Technology.
[67] Ryan LaRose,et al. Overview and Comparison of Gate Level Quantum Software Platforms , 2018, Quantum.
[68] Seth Lloyd,et al. Convergence conditions for random quantum circuits , 2005, quant-ph/0503210.
[69] U. Vazirani,et al. On the complexity and verification of quantum random circuit sampling , 2018, Nature Physics.
[70] Scott Aaronson,et al. Complexity-Theoretic Foundations of Quantum Supremacy Experiments , 2016, CCC.
[71] M. Bremner,et al. Temporally unstructured quantum computation , 2009, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.
[72] Kenneth Rudinger,et al. What Randomized Benchmarking Actually Measures. , 2017, Physical review letters.
[73] Travis S. Humble,et al. Quantum supremacy using a programmable superconducting processor , 2019, Nature.
[74] Isaac L. Chuang,et al. Quantum Computation and Quantum Information (10th Anniversary edition) , 2011 .
[75] C. Monroe,et al. Quantum approximate optimization of the long-range Ising model with a trapped-ion quantum simulator , 2019, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[76] Elham Kashefi,et al. Information Theoretically Secure Hypothesis Test for Temporally Unstructured Quantum Computation (Extended Abstract) , 2017, 1704.01998.
[77] Hartmut Neven,et al. Fourier analysis of sampling from noisy chaotic quantum circuits , 2017, 1708.01875.
[78] Arnaud Carignan-Dugas,et al. From randomized benchmarking experiments to gate-set circuit fidelity: how to interpret randomized benchmarking decay parameters , 2018, New Journal of Physics.
[79] Ross Duncan,et al. Phase Gadget Synthesis for Shallow Circuits , 2019, QPL.
[80] Ross Duncan,et al. t|ket⟩: a retargetable compiler for NISQ devices , 2020, Quantum Science and Technology.
[81] D. Cory,et al. Quantum bootstrapping via compressed quantum Hamiltonian learning , 2014, 1409.1524.
[82] John Preskill,et al. Quantum computing and the entanglement frontier , 2012, 1203.5813.
[83] Margaret Martonosi,et al. Compiler Management of Communication and Parallelism for Quantum Computation , 2015, ASPLOS.
[84] S. Debnath,et al. Demonstration of a small programmable quantum computer with atomic qubits , 2016, Nature.
[85] M. Blaauboer,et al. An analytical decomposition protocol for optimal implementation of two-qubit entangling gates , 2006, cond-mat/0609750.
[86] J. Eisert,et al. Direct certification of a class of quantum simulations , 2016, 1602.00703.
[87] Alán Aspuru-Guzik,et al. Quantum computational chemistry , 2018, Reviews of Modern Physics.
[88] Alán Aspuru-Guzik,et al. A variational eigenvalue solver on a photonic quantum processor , 2013, Nature Communications.
[89] C. Figgatt,et al. Demonstration of the QCCD trapped-ion quantum computer architecture , 2020, 2003.01293.
[90] Ashley Montanaro,et al. Average-case complexity versus approximate simulation of commuting quantum computations , 2015, Physical review letters.
[91] M. Bremner,et al. Instantaneous Quantum Computation , 2008, 0809.0847.
[92] M Steffen,et al. Characterization of addressability by simultaneous randomized benchmarking. , 2012, Physical review letters.
[93] I. Chuang,et al. Quantum Computation and Quantum Information: Bibliography , 2010 .
[94] Stephanie Wehner,et al. Towards Large-Scale Quantum Networks , 2019, NANOCOM.
[95] Adam Bouland,et al. Quantum Supremacy and the Complexity of Random Circuit Sampling , 2018, ITCS.
[96] H. Neven,et al. Characterizing quantum supremacy in near-term devices , 2016, Nature Physics.
[97] Jay M. Gambetta,et al. Effective Hamiltonian models of the cross-resonance gate , 2018, Physical Review A.
[98] Alejandro Perdomo-Ortiz,et al. A generative modeling approach for benchmarking and training shallow quantum circuits , 2018, npj Quantum Information.
[99] Ramis Movassagh,et al. Efficient unitary paths and quantum computational supremacy: A proof of average-case hardness of Random Circuit Sampling , 2018, 1810.04681.