Modeling and simulation of low-energy electron scattering in organic and inorganic EUV photoresists

Alternative photoresist platforms are being developed with the goal of meeting Resolution, Roughness and Sensitivity requirements for EUV lithography. Metal-based materials appear promising due to the high etch resistance, high absorption, and high resolution. However, the exposure mechanism of these materials is quite different from that of organic chemically amplified resists. The current electron-scattering model built into PROLITHTM X6.0 allows a direct comparison of the exposure mechanisms for different resist platforms: in particular, it is now possible to estimate the intrinsic resist uncertainty by evaluating electron, acid shot noise and spatial blurring, while forcing the photon shot noise contribution to zero. A comparison between organic resists and metal-based platforms reveals how the denser nature of the latter help containing the electron scattering in a much closer radius around the absorption event. The consequent electron-reaction (acid generation for photo-active-generator-containing organic materials, ligand dissociation for the metal-oxides) reflects the electron shot noise of the different platforms. The higher absorption combined with lower blur of the metaloxide materials seem to become of crucial importance for the 5 nm technology node and beyond.

[1]  Patrick P. Naulleau,et al.  Analysis of shot noise limitations due to absorption count in EUV resists , 2015, Advanced Lithography.

[2]  R. H. Ritchie,et al.  Inelastic Interactions of Electrons with Polystyrene: Calculations of Mean Free Paths, Stopping Powers, and CSDA Ranges , 1978, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[3]  E. T. Arakawa,et al.  Optical properties of polystyrene from the near-infrared to the x-ray region and convergence of optical sum rules , 1977 .

[4]  W. V. Mayneord,et al.  A Survey of Depth Dose Data , 1941 .

[5]  Patrick P. Naulleau,et al.  Study of energy delivery and mean free path of low energy electrons in EUV resists , 2016, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[6]  Bernhard Kneer,et al.  Imaging performance of EUV lithography optics configuration for sub-9nm resolution , 2015, Advanced Lithography.

[7]  Lei Sun,et al.  Line-edge roughness performance targets for EUV lithography , 2017, Advanced Lithography.

[8]  Alessandro Vaglio Pret,et al.  XAS photoresists electron/quantum yields study with synchrotron light , 2015, Advanced Lithography.

[9]  M. Born.  Quantenmechanik der Stoßvorgänge , 1926 .

[10]  Yunfei Deng,et al.  Pattern prediction in EUV resists , 2009, Lithography Asia.

[11]  C. Mack.  Fundamental principles of optical lithography , 2007 .

[12]  Andreas Frommhold,et al.  Dynamic absorption coefficients of CAR and non-CAR resists at EUV , 2016, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[13]  Amrit Narasimhan,et al.  Studying secondary electron behavior in EUV resists using experimentation and modeling , 2015, Advanced Lithography.

[14]  David Liljequist,et al.  On the validity of trajectory methods for calculating the transport of very low energy (<1 keV) electrons in liquids and amorphous media , 2014 .

[15]  Ming Mao,et al.  Design and pitch scaling for affordable node transition and EUV insertion scenario , 2017, Advanced Lithography.

[16]  Geert Vandenberghe,et al.  Characterizing and modeling electrical response to light for metal-based EUV photoresists , 2016, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[17]  A. M. Malvezzi,et al.  Transmittance and optical constants of erbium films in the 3.25-1580 eV spectral range. , 2011, Applied optics.

[18]  Santiago Heredia-Avalos,et al.  Influence of the description of the target energy‐loss function on the energy loss of swift projectiles , 2008 .

[19]  N. M. Badiger,et al.  Determination of Effective Atomic Numbers Using Different Methods for Some Low-Z Materials , 2014 .

[20]  D. R. Penn,et al.  Electron mean-free-path calculations using a model dielectric function. , 1987, Physical review. B, Condensed matter.

[21]  Joshua S. Hooge,et al.  Extreme-ultraviolet secondary electron blur at the 22-nm half pitch node , 2011 .

[22]  G. Schulz,et al.  Resonances in Electron Impact on Diatomic Molecules , 1973 .

[23]  T. Wallow,et al.  Deconstructing contact hole CD printing variability in EUV lithography , 2014, Advanced Lithography.

[24]  M. Dapor.  Electron-Beam Interactions with Solids , 2003 .

[25]  George J. Schulz.  Resonances in Electron Impact on Atoms and Diatomic Molecules , 1973 .

[26]  S. Tagawa,et al.  Radiation Chemistry in Chemically Amplified Resists , 2010 .

[27]  Zhenyu Tan,et al.  Cross sections of electron inelastic interactions in DNA , 2004, Radiation and environmental biophysics.

[28]  R. Brainard,et al.  Resolution, Line-Edge Roughness, Sensitivity Tradeoff, and Quantum Yield of High Photo Acid Generator Resists for Extreme Ultraviolet Lithography , 2011 .

[29]  N. Carron.  An Introduction to the Passage of Energetic Particles through Matter , 2006 .

[30]  John J. Biafore,et al.  Stochastic exposure kinetics of extreme ultraviolet photoresists: Trapping model , 2013 .

[31]  Guillaume Petite,et al.  Ultra-fast relaxation of electrons in wide-gap dielectrics , 2007 .

[32]  D. R. Penn,et al.  Calculations of electron inelastic mean free paths , 2005 .

[33]  David Blankenship,et al.  Resist pattern prediction at EUV , 2010, Advanced Lithography.