The role of the Subset Principle in L2 acquisition : A case study of Japanese and Mandarin Chinese

論文) This paper reports on an experiment which tests the role of the Subset Principle in second language acquisition, using, as its test-ground, different interpretations of elided nominal subjects in Japanese and Mandarin Chinese. Mandarin Chinese allows only the subset of interpretation with respect to what Japanese allows. The Subset Principle predicts that introductory Japanese L2 learners of Mandarin Chinese start with the subset reading, whereas the Transfer theory predicts that the superset reading is also available when interpreting L2 Mandarin Chinese sentences, because their L1 Japanese allows the superset reading. The current experiment shows that most of the participants behaved in a way that is consistent with the Subset Principle, although a small number of speakers showed behavior that is consistent with the Transfer theory. We raise the possibility that L2 acquisition can be characterized as a conflict between universal principles, such as the Subset Principle, and L1 transfer. While the current paper reports one case study and hence its impact may be limited, it does offer a new informative set of data bearing on the general issue of L2 acquisition. 日本語主語省略構文では、省略された主語には二つの解釈(不定(indefinite)解釈、 定(definite)解釈)が付与される。一方中国語では、一つの解釈(定解釈)しか付与 されない。つまり、主語省略構文の解釈における日本語と中国語の間には、全体集合 (日本語)、部分集合(中国語)の関係が成立する。従って、日本語を母語とする初 級中国語学習者が主語省略構文を解釈する際、部分集合の原理が機能している場合 と、母語の転移が起こっている場合とで、相反する振る舞いを予測する。つまり、学 習の初期段階において部分集合の原理が機能する場合は定解釈のみ容認し、不定解釈 は容認しないが、学習の初期段階で転移が起こる場合は定解釈と不定解釈の両方の解 Reports of the Keio Institute of Cultural and Linguistic Studies 47 (2016), 113~141

[1]  Ellen Broselow,et al.  Unmarked structures and emergent rankings in second language phonology , 2004 .

[2]  B. Hayes,et al.  Phonological Acquisition in Optimality Theory: the Early Stages 1 Submitted for a Forthcoming Volume on Phonological Acquisition and Typology, Edited Phonological Acquisition in Optimality Theory: the Early Stages , 1999 .

[3]  Richard S. Kayne On Certain Differences between French and English , 1981 .

[4]  Kazuyo Otani,et al.  V-raising and VP-ellipsis , 1991 .

[5]  Jacquelyn Schachter,et al.  On the issue of completeness in second language acquisition , 1990 .

[6]  T. McNamara Measuring Second Language Performance , 1996 .

[7]  R. Clark The Selection of Syntactic Knowledge , 1992 .

[8]  Evelyn P. Altenberg,et al.  Theoretical Implications of an Error Analysis of Second Language Phonology Production. , 1983 .

[9]  Luigi Rizzi,et al.  Issues in Italian Syntax , 1981 .

[10]  P. Smolensky The Initial State and 'Richness of the Base' in Optimality Theory , 1996 .

[11]  Lise Menn,et al.  PHONOTACTIC RULES IN BEGINING SPEECH , 1971 .

[12]  Rex A. Sprouse,et al.  L2 cognitive states and the Full Transfer/Full Access model , 1996 .

[13]  Tomoko Monou,et al.  The emergence of the unmarked in L2 acquisition: Interpreting null subjects , 2013 .

[14]  Satoshi Oku,et al.  A Theory of Selection and Reconstruction in the Minimalist Perspective , 1998 .

[15]  Rita M. Manzini,et al.  Parameters, binding theory and learnability , 1987 .

[16]  Rex A. Sprouse,et al.  Word Order and Nominative Case in Non-Native Language Acquisition: A longitudinal study of (L1 Turkish) German Interlanguage , 1994 .

[17]  M. Saito Some asymmetries in Japanese and their theoretical implications , 1985 .

[18]  Akira Watanabe,et al.  Functional Projections of Nominals in Japanese: Syntax of Classifiers* , 2006 .

[19]  Daiko Takahashi Noun Phrase Ellipsis , 2008 .

[20]  L. Cheng,et al.  Bare and Not-So-Bare Nouns and the Structure of NP , 1999, Linguistic Inquiry.

[21]  Stephen Crain,et al.  Focus identification in child Mandarin* , 2009, Journal of Child Language.

[22]  Dana Angluin,et al.  Inductive Inference of Formal Languages from Positive Data , 1980, Inf. Control..

[23]  Koichi Tateishi Subjects, SPEC, and DP in Japanese , 1987 .

[24]  Fred R. Eckman FROM PHONEMIC DIFFERENCES TO CONSTRAINT RANKINGS: Research on Second Language Phonology , 2004, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[25]  黒田 成幸 Generative grammatical studies in the Japanese language , 1965 .

[26]  Margaret Thomas,et al.  Acquisition of the Japanese reflexive zibun and movement of anaphors in Logical Form , 1995 .

[27]  Takuya Goro,et al.  Language -specific constraints on scope interpretation in first language acquisition , 2007 .

[28]  Daiko Takahashi,et al.  ELLIPSIS OF ARGUMENTS IN JAPANESE AND TURKISH , 2010 .

[29]  R. May The grammar of quantification , 1978 .

[30]  Daniel Finer,et al.  Binding Parameters in Second Language Acquisition , 1991 .

[31]  M. Saito Notes on East Asian Argument Ellipsis , 2007 .

[32]  Julien Musolino,et al.  Universal Grammar and the Acquisition of Semantic Knowledge: An Experimental Investigation into the Acquisition of Quantifier-Negation Interaction in English , 1999 .

[33]  Hajime Hoji,et al.  Logical form constraints and configurational structures in Japanese , 1985 .

[34]  Gerald P. Berent THE SUBSET PRINCIPLE IN SECOND-LANGUAGE ACQUISITION , 2013 .

[35]  Janet Grijzenhout,et al.  Voicing and devoicing in English, German, and Dutch; evidence for domain-specific identity constraints , 2000 .

[36]  Kevin R. Gregg SECOND LANGUAGE ACQUISITION AND UNIVERSAL GRAMMAR , 2004, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[37]  Bruce Tesar,et al.  Enforcing Grammatical Restrictiveness Can Help Resolve Structural Ambiguity , 2002 .

[38]  Daiko Takahashi,et al.  Quantificational Null Objects and Argument Ellipsis , 2008, Linguistic Inquiry.

[39]  Makiko Hirakawa,et al.  A study of the L2 acquisition of English reflexives , 1990 .

[40]  Andrea Gualmini,et al.  Some knowledge children don't lack , 2004 .

[41]  Robert Bley-Vroman,et al.  The logical problem of foreign language learning , 1989 .

[42]  Janet Dean Fodor,et al.  How to Obey the Subset Principle: Binding and Locality , 2018, Binding, Dependencies, and Learnability.

[43]  Robert Bley-Vroman,et al.  THE EVOLVING CONTEXT OF THE FUNDAMENTAL DIFFERENCE HYPOTHESIS , 2009, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[44]  P. Smolensky,et al.  Optimality Theory: Constraint Interaction in Generative Grammar , 2004 .

[45]  Ellen Broselow,et al.  THE EMERGENCE OF THE UNMARKED IN SECOND LANGUAGE PHONOLOGY , 1998, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[46]  Dalila Ayoun,et al.  The subset principle in second language acquisition , 1996, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[47]  Fred R. Eckman ON THE NATURALNESS OF INTERLANGUAGE PHONOLOGICAL RULES1 , 1981 .

[48]  Anjum P. Saleemi Universal Grammar and Language Learnability: Notes , 1992 .

[49]  Robert C. Berwick,et al.  The acquisition of syntactic knowledge , 1985 .

[50]  Daniel Finer,et al.  Parameter setting in second language phonology and syntax , 1991 .