Farm-SAFE: the process of developing a plot- and farm-scale model of arable, forestry, and silvoarable economics

Financial feasibility and financial return are two key issues that farmers and land owners consider when deciding between alternative land uses such as arable farming, forestry and agroforestry. Moreover regional variations in yields, prices and government grants mean that the relative revenue and cost of such systems can vary substantially within Europe. To aid our understanding of these variations, the European Commission sponsored a research project called “Silvoarable Agroforestry For Europe” (SAFE). This paper describes the process of developing a new economic model within that project. The initial stages included establishing criteria for the model with end-users and reviewing the literature and existing models. This indicated that the economic model needed to allow comparison of arable farming, forestry and agroforestry systems at a plot- and a farm-scale. The form of comparisons included net margins, net present values, infinite net present values, equivalent annual values, and labour requirements. It was decided that the model would operate in a spreadsheet format, and the effect of phased planting patterns would be included at a farm-scale. Following initial development, additional user feedback led to a final choice on a model name, a final method of collating input data, and the inclusion of field-based operations such as varying the cropped area, replacing dead trees, and pruning. In addition options in terms of improved graphical outputs and the ability to undertake sensitivity analysis were developed. Some of the key lessons learnt include the need to establish clear model criteria and the benefits of developing a working prototype at an early stage to gain user-feedback.

[1]  Paul J. Burgess,et al.  Development and application of bio-economic modelling to compare silvoarable, arable and forestry systems in three European countries , 2007 .

[2]  Practical Forestry for the Agent and Surveyor , 1967 .

[3]  R. Cramb,et al.  Economic incentives for farmers in the Philippine uplands to adopt hedgerow intercropping , 1998 .

[4]  T. H. Thomas,et al.  Poplar agroforestry: a re-evaluation of its economic potential on arable land in the United Kingdom , 1993 .

[5]  Paul J. Burgess,et al.  Implementation and calibration of the parameter-sparse Yield-SAFE model to predict production and land equivalent ratio in mixed tree and crop systems under two contrasting production situations in Europe , 2010 .

[6]  A. Gordon,et al.  Temperate Agroforestry Systems , 1997 .

[7]  W. Reid,et al.  Millennium Ecosystem Assessment , 2005 .

[8]  C. Ong,et al.  Can the ecosystem mimic hypotheses be applied to farms in African savannahs? , 1999, Agroforestry Systems.

[9]  P. J. Burgess,et al.  Poplar (Populus spp) growth and crop yields in a silvoarable experiment at three lowland sites in England , 2005, Agroforestry Systems.

[10]  M. van Noordwijk,et al.  WaNuLCAS, a model of water, nutrient and light capture in agroforestry systems , 2004, Agroforestry Systems.

[11]  Robin Matthews,et al.  Low External Input Technologies for Livelihood Improvement in Subsistence Agriculture , 2004 .

[12]  Millenium Ecosystem Assessment Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis , 2005 .

[13]  M. van Noordwijk,et al.  Backgrounds of a model of water nutrient and light capture in agroforestry system , 1999 .

[14]  D. Mercer,et al.  Socioeconomic research in agroforestry: progress, prospects, priorities , 2004, Agroforestry Systems.

[15]  C. Dupraz,et al.  Temperate agroforestry: the European way , 1997 .

[16]  P. Burgess,et al.  Application of an ecosystem function framework to perceptions of community woodlands , 2009 .

[17]  P. Burgess,et al.  Yield-SAFE: A parameter-sparse process-based dynamic model for predicting resource capture, growth and production in agroforestry systems , 2007 .

[18]  T. H. Thomas,et al.  A spreadsheet approach to the economic modelling of agroforestry systems , 1991 .

[19]  P. Burgess,et al.  Farmer Perceptions of Silvoarable Systems in Seven European Countries , 2009 .

[20]  D. Pannell,et al.  Social and economic challenges in the development of complex farming systems , 1999, Agroforestry Systems.

[21]  P. J. Burgess,et al.  Development and Use of a Framework for Characterising Computer Models of Silvoarable Economics , 2005, Agroforestry Systems.

[22]  Sam L. Savage Decision Making with Insight (with Insight.xla 2.0 and CD-ROM) , 2003 .