Using Innovative Learning Technologies to Promote Learning and Engagement in an Urban Science Classroom

Recent reform movements within the United States have called for science for all and educational reforms to support this goal. In light of these reform movements and concerns regarding learning within urban schools, science educators and policy makers have pushed for the incorporation of learning technologies within schools as a way of creating equity and promoting learning among diverse learners. The Center for Learning Technologies in Urban Schools has been working to create and adopt standards and project-based science curricula in a large systemic reform effort. A core challenge of this partnership has been to embed learning technologies within these units to support active and engaged learning. This article examines how two interactive learning technologies embedded within an extended project-based science curriculum unit are capable of engaging urban students in actively learning key science concepts.

[1]  Joseph Krajcik,et al.  Inquiry-based science in the middle grades: Assessment of learning in urban systemic reform , 2004 .

[2]  Jo Ellen Roseman,et al.  How well do middle school science programs measure up? Findings from Project 2061's curriculum review , 2002 .

[3]  J. Lagowski.  National Science Education Standards , 1995 .

[4]  J. Meece,et al.  Task Factors, Teacher Behavior, and Students' Involvement and Use of Learning Strategies in Science , 1988, The Elementary School Journal.

[5]  Matthew B. Miles,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook , 1994 .

[6]  Vanessa Colella,et al.  Participatory Simulations: Building Collaborative Understanding Through Immersive Dynamic Modeling , 2000 .

[7]  Joseph Krajcik,et al.  Standardized Test Outcomes of Urban Students Participating in Standards and Project Based Science Curricula , 2004, ICLS.

[8]  H. Becker.  Who's wired and who's not: children's access to and use of computer technology. , 2000, The Future of children.

[9]  Joseph Krajcik,et al.  Achieving standards in urban systemic reform: An example of a sixth grade project‐based science curriculum , 2004 .

[10]  Michael Eisenberg,et al.  Log on education: science in the palms of their hands , 1999, CACM.

[11]  Joseph Krajcik,et al.  The Nature of Middle School Learners' Science Content Understandings with the Use of On-line Resources , 2003 .

[12]  Joseph Krajcik,et al.  Using Technology to Support Students’ Artefact Construction in Science , 1998 .

[13]  Mitchel Resnick,et al.  Participatory simulations: using computational objects to learn about dynamic systems , 1998, CHI Conference Summary.

[14]  Mitchel Resnick,et al.  Things that Blink: Computationally Augmented Name Tags , 1996, IBM Syst. J..

[15]  Joseph Krajcik,et al.  Instructional, Curricular, and Technological Supports for Inquiry in Science Classrooms , 1998 .

[16]  Annemarie S. Palincsar,et al.  Motivating Project-Based Learning: Sustaining the Doing, Supporting the Learning , 1991 .

[17]  Michael Pressley,et al.  Educational Psychology: Learning, Instruction, Assessment , 1996 .

[18]  Joseph Krajcik,et al.  Constructing Extended Inquiry Projects: Curriculum Materials for Science Education Reform , 2000 .

[19]  Sharon J. Lynch.  Equity and Science Education Reform , 2000 .

[20]  H. M. Marks,et al.  Student Engagement in Instructional Activity: Patterns in the Elementary, Middle, and High School Years , 2000 .

[21]  Joseph Krajcik,et al.  Enacting Reform-Based Science Materials: The Range of Teacher Enactments in Reform Classrooms , 2005 .

[22]  M. Resnick,et al.  Programmable Bricks: Toys to Think With , 1996, IBM Syst. J..

[23]  渋江 靖弘,et al.  Science for All Americans , 1990 .

[24]  Joseph Krajcik,et al.  Science on the Web: Students Online in a Sixth-Grade Classroom , 2000 .

[25]  Jennifer A. Fredricks,et al.  Inquiry in Project-Based Science Classrooms: Initial Attempts by Middle School Students , 1998 .

[26]  Marcia C. Linn,et al.  The Impact of Technology on Science Instruction: Historical Trends and Current Opportunities , 1998 .

[27]  Jo Ellen Roseman,et al.  Can Middle-School Science textbooks help students learn important ideas? Findings from project 2061's curriculum evaluation study: Life Science , 2004 .

[28]  Ae McFarlane,et al.  Where You Want IT, When You Want IT: The Role of Portable Computers in Science Education , 1998 .

[29]  Mary M. Atwater.  Equity for Black Americans in precollege science , 2000 .

[30]  Charles W. Anderson,et al.  Task Engagement and Conceptual Change in Middle School Science Classrooms , 1993 .

[31]  A. Barton.  Reframing "Science for all" through the Politics of Poverty , 1998 .

[32]  E. Soloway,et al.  Creating Usable Innovations in Systemic Reform: Scaling Up Technology-Embedded Project-Based Science in Urban Schools , 2000 .