EVOKE: A Value-Driven Concept Selection Method for Early System Design

The development of new technologically advanced products requires the contribution from a range of skills and disciplines, which are often difficult to find within a single company or organization. Requirements establishment practices in Systems Engineering (SE), while ensuring coordination of activities and tasks across the supply network, fall short when it comes to facilitate knowledge sharing and negotiation during early system design. Empirical observations show that when system-level requirements are not available or not mature enough, engineers dealing with the development of long lead-time sub-systems tend to target local optima, rather than opening up the design space. This phenomenon causes design teams to generate solutions that do not embody the best possible configuration for the overall system. The aim of this paper is to show how methodologies for value-driven design may address this issue, facilitating early stage design iterations and the resolution of early stage design trade-offs. The paper describes how such methodologies may help gathering and dispatching relevant knowledge about the ‘design intent’ of a system to the cross-functional engineering teams, so to facilitate a more concurrent process for requirement elicitation in SE. The paper also describes EVOKE (Early Value Oriented design exploration with KnowledgE maturity), a concept selection method that allows benchmarking design options at sub-system level on the base of value-related information communicated by the system integrators. The use of EVOKE is exemplified in an industrial case study related to the design of an aero-engine component. EVOKE’s ability to raise awareness on the value contribution of early stage design concepts in the SE process has been further verified with industrial practitioners in ad-hoc design episodes.

[1]  Peter Hollingsworth,et al.  Defining a Research Agenda in Value Driven Design: Questions that Need to be Asked , 2011 .

[2]  Wei Chen,et al.  Decision-Based Design: Integrating Consumer Preferences into Engineering Design , 2012 .

[3]  James Scanlan,et al.  Optimising the Development of a Medical Device Using Formal Engineering Design Techniques and the CODA-System , 2006 .

[4]  Jürgen H. Daum Intangible Assets and Value Creation , 2002 .

[5]  K. Tan,et al.  Integrating Kano's model in the planning matrix of quality function deployment , 2000 .

[6]  P. John Clarkson,et al.  Review of Value and Lean in Complex Product Development , 2015, Syst. Eng..

[7]  David G. Ullman,et al.  The Mechanical Design Process , 1992 .

[8]  Y. Chen,et al.  A methodology of determining aggregated importance of engineering characteristics in QFD , 2007, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[9]  Roger Jianxin Jiao,et al.  Customer Requirement Management in Product Development: A Review of Research Issues , 2006, Concurr. Eng. Res. Appl..

[10]  Klaus Pohl,et al.  Requirements Engineering - Fundamentals, Principles, and Techniques , 2010 .

[11]  Lawrence D. Miles,et al.  Techniques Of Value Analysis And Engineering , 1961 .

[12]  T. Saaty,et al.  The Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1985 .

[13]  Adam Brandenburger,et al.  Co-opetition : 1. a revolutionary mindset that combines competition and cooperation in the marketplace : 2. the game theory strategy that's changing the game of business , 1997 .

[14]  Marco Bertoni,et al.  MODELS FOR VALUE-DRIVEN ENGINEERING DESIGN , 2016 .

[15]  Marco Bertoni,et al.  Knowledge Maturity as a Means to Support Decision Making during Product-Service Systems Development Projects in the Aerospace Sector , 2011 .

[16]  Paul Collopy,et al.  A Research Agenda for the Coming Renaissance in Systems Engineering , 2012 .

[17]  Christopher Durugbo,et al.  Viewpoint–participation–technique: A model of participative requirements elicitation , 2013, Concurr. Eng. Res. Appl..

[18]  Marco Bertoni,et al.  Analysing the effects of value drivers and knowledge maturity in preliminary design decision-making. , 2015 .

[19]  P. Sassone,et al.  Cost-Benefit Analysis: A Handbook , 1978 .

[20]  Frank van der Zwan,et al.  Value Analysis of Engine Maintenance Scheduling relative to Fuel Burn and Minimal Operating Costs , 2010 .

[21]  A. Terry Bahill,et al.  QFD: VALIDATING ROBUSTNESS , 1999 .

[22]  Shun Takai,et al.  Sensitivity analysis of relative worth in quality function deployment matrices , 2012, Concurr. Eng. Res. Appl..

[23]  Sophie Hallstedt,et al.  Assessing Sustainability and Value of Manufacturing Processes:: A case in the aerospace industry , 2015 .

[24]  R. B. Woodruff,et al.  Know Your Customer: New Approaches to Understanding Customer Value and Satisfaction , 1996 .

[25]  赤尾 洋二,et al.  QFD : the customer-driven approach to quality planning and deployment , 1994 .

[26]  Peter Hollingsworth,et al.  Defining a research agenda in Value Driven Design: Questions that need to be asked , 2011 .

[27]  Adam M. Ross,et al.  Aligning Perspectives and Methods for Value-Driven Design , 2010 .

[28]  Marco Bertoni,et al.  Mapping customer needs to engineering characteristics: an aerospace perspective for conceptual design , 2014 .

[29]  Ian Wright Design Methods in Engineering and Product Design , 1998 .

[30]  Kemper Lewis,et al.  Limitations of the House of Quality to provide quantitative design information , 2008 .

[31]  Paul Kauffmann,et al.  Integration of Kano's Model Into QFD for Multiple Product Design , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[32]  C. K. Kwong,et al.  Intelligent process design system for the transfer moulding of electronic packages , 2004 .

[33]  Biren Prasad,et al.  Enabling principles of concurrency and simultaneity in concurrent engineering , 1999, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.

[34]  M. A. Rosenman Qualitative evaluation for typological specialization in conceptual design , 1993 .

[35]  Mikel Sorli,et al.  The transformation of product development process into lean environment using set-based concurrent engineering: A case study from an aerospace industry , 2013, Concurr. Eng. Res. Appl..

[36]  Ming-Chyuan Lin,et al.  Using AHP and TOPSIS approaches in customer-driven product design process , 2008, Comput. Ind..

[37]  Aurélie Dudezert,et al.  Systemic Approach as a Multi-Criteria Design Method: Healthcare R&D Centre Application , 2007 .

[38]  Josep Gubau New product design and development , 2016 .

[39]  Paul R. Carlile,et al.  A Pragmatic View of Knowledge and Boundaries: Boundary Objects in New Product Development , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[40]  Colin Potts,et al.  Design of Everyday Things , 1988 .

[41]  Daniel E. Hastings,et al.  Multi-Attribute Tradespace Exploration as Front End for Effective Space System Design , 2004 .

[42]  J. Tien The next industrial revolution: Integrated services and goods , 2012, Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering.

[43]  John H. Sheesley,et al.  Quality Engineering in Production Systems , 1988 .

[44]  Daniel D. Frey,et al.  The Pugh Controlled Convergence method: model-based evaluation and implications for design theory , 2009 .

[45]  Nihal Erginel,et al.  Construction of a fuzzy QFD failure matrix using a fuzzy multiple-objective decision model , 2010 .

[46]  Stefano Brusoni,et al.  Exploring the miracle: strategy and management of the knowledge base in the aeronautics industry , 2007 .

[47]  Claude Baron,et al.  Replacing target setting by value models in the ‘house of quality’ for value-based requirements specifications , 2015 .

[48]  Paul Collopy,et al.  Value-Driven Design , 2009 .

[49]  Marco Bertoni,et al.  Avoiding resonant frequencies in a pipeline application by utilising the concept design analysis method , 2015 .

[50]  Michael Geisser,et al.  A Method for Collaborative Requirements Elicitation and Decision-Supported Requirements Analysis , 2006, IFIP Workshop on Advanced Software Engineering.

[51]  Keqin Wang,et al.  Towards avoiding the hidden traps in QFD during requirements establishment , 2015 .

[52]  Leonard E. Miller,et al.  NASA systems engineering handbook , 1995 .

[53]  Daniel E. Hastings,et al.  A Framework for Incorporating "ilities" in Tradespace Studies , 2007 .

[54]  George A. Hazelrigg,et al.  A Framework for Decision-Based Engineering Design , 1998 .

[55]  V. Zeithaml Consumer Perceptions of Price, Quality, and Value: A Means-End Model and Synthesis of Evidence: , 1988 .

[56]  Mario Kossmann,et al.  7.4.1 Towards a Value‐Driven Design Methodology – Enhancing Traditional Requirements Management Within the Extended Enterprise , 2012 .

[57]  Mark Price,et al.  A Novel Method to Enable Trade-offs across the Whole Product Life of an Aircraft using Value Driven Design , 2012 .

[58]  Zafar Iqbal,et al.  Statistical comparison of final weight scores in quality function deployment (QFD) studies , 2014 .

[59]  Marco Bertoni,et al.  Value‐Driven Design – A methodology to Link Expectations to Technical Requirements in the Extended Enterprise , 2013 .

[60]  Daniel E. Hastings,et al.  Flexibility and the value of on-orbit servicing: New customer-centric perspective , 2003 .

[61]  Mark Price,et al.  Developing a Capability Function Relating Aircraft Systems Cost Overruns to Aircraft Design Parameters , 2011 .

[62]  Pieter Desmet,et al.  Designing Products with Added Emotional Value: Development and Appllcation of an Approach for Research through Design , 2001 .

[63]  Massimo Panarotto,et al.  Experimenting the use of Value Models as Boundary Objects in Conceptual PSS Design , 2016 .

[64]  Owen Brown,et al.  Value-Centric Design Methodologies for Fractionated Spacecraft: Progress Summary from Phase 1 of the DARPA System F6 Program , 2009 .

[65]  Dimitri N. Mavris,et al.  Strategic Decision-Making: Applications of Game Theory in a Systems Approach to Commercial Engine Selection , 2005 .

[66]  Tomohiko Sakao,et al.  Service Engineering: a novel engineering discipline for producers to increase value combining service and product , 2007 .

[67]  Gunnar Abrahamson,et al.  Terminology for model credibility , 1980 .

[68]  Crispin Hales,et al.  Engineering design: a systematic approach , 1989 .

[69]  Marco Bertoni,et al.  Using 3D CAD Models for Value Visualization: An Approach with SIEMENS NX HD3D Visual Reporting , 2014 .

[70]  Hans Johannesson,et al.  Supplier Integration and Communication Strategies in Collaborative Platform Development , 2008, Concurr. Eng. Res. Appl..

[71]  Tyson R. Browning,et al.  On customer value and improvement in product development processes , 2003 .

[72]  Claude Baron,et al.  A prescriptive approach to qualify and quantify customer value for value-based requirements engineering , 2013, Int. J. Comput. Integr. Manuf..

[73]  Paul Collopy,et al.  Aerospace System Value Models: A Survey and Observations , 2009 .

[74]  Ndrianarilala Rianantsoa,et al.  Overview of Value‐Driven Design Research: Methods, Applications, and Relevance for Conceptual Design , 2014 .

[75]  Paul Collopy,et al.  Implementation of value-driven optimisation for the design of aircraft fuselage panels , 2009 .

[76]  John W. Dahlgren 9.3.2 “Real Options and Value Driven Design in Spiral Development” , 2006 .

[77]  Tim Baines,et al.  The servitization of manufacturing: A review of literature and reflection on future challenges , 2009 .

[78]  Olivier L. de Weck,et al.  ENHANCING THE ECONOMICS OF COMMUNICATIONS SATELLITES VIA ORBITAL RECONFIGURATIONS AND STAGED DEPLOYMENT , 2003 .

[79]  A. Terry Bahill,et al.  Re-evaluating systems engineering concepts using systems thinking , 1998, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part C.

[80]  N. Lowe,et al.  A critical review of visual analogue scales in the measurement of clinical phenomena. , 1990, Research in nursing & health.

[81]  Michel-Alexandre Cardin,et al.  Extracting Value from Uncertainty: Proposed Methodology for Engineering Systems Design , 2007 .

[82]  Bruce Archer,et al.  Product design: fundamental and methods , 1997 .

[83]  James Scanlan,et al.  Application of Value-Driven Design to Commercial Aero-Engine Systems , 2010 .

[84]  Taezoon Park,et al.  A Concept Evaluation Method for Strategic Product Design with Concurrent Consideration of Future Customer Requirements , 2010, Concurr. Eng. Res. Appl..

[85]  A. Tversky,et al.  Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty , 1992 .

[86]  Stelios H. Zanakis,et al.  Multi-attribute decision making: A simulation comparison of select methods , 1998, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[87]  Daniel E. Hastings,et al.  Defining changeability: Reconciling flexibility, adaptability, scalability, modifiability, and robustness for maintaining system lifecycle value , 2008 .