The effectiveness of boundary objects: the case of ecological indicators

Nature conservation policy relies on ecological indicators to assess ecosystem quality and to evaluate the effectiveness of policy and management. Ecological indicators are science-based instruments that classify nature into different (ecosystem) types, each of which is characterised by specific parameters and references. This paper draws on classification and boundary object theory to analyse two case studies about the role of ecological indicators in nature conservation. The cases show that interpretative flexibility is an important factor explaining the effectiveness of ecological indicators as boundary objects. However, rather than a characteristic of the indicator itself, this is a social achievement, which depends on a common culture of shared values and preferences. The paper concludes by discussing the implications of these findings for the concept of boundary objects

[1]  C. Russell,et al.  Ecological Conservation: The Problems of Targeting Policies and Designing Instruments , 2008 .

[2]  M. Hisschemöller,et al.  Science in Wadden Sea policy: from accommodation to advocacy , 2008 .

[3]  Kenneth R. Fleischmann,et al.  Boundary Objects with Agency: A Method for Studying the Design–Use Interface , 2006, Inf. Soc..

[4]  Beth Greenhough,et al.  Decontextualised? Dissociated? Detached? Mapping the Networks of Bioinformatics Exchange , 2006 .

[5]  Stephen Zehr.  Comparative boundary work: US acid rain and global climate change policy deliberations , 2005 .

[6]  S. Raman.  Institutional perspectives on science-policy boundaries , 2005 .

[7]  S. Jasanoff.  States of Knowledge: The Co-production of Science and the Social Order , 2004 .

[8]  T. Hellström,et al.  Boundary organisations in science: From discourse to construction , 2003 .

[9]  Paul R. Carlile,et al.  A Pragmatic View of Knowledge and Boundaries: Boundary Objects in New Product Development , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[10]  Cornelis Disco,et al.  Remaking “Nature”: The Ecological Turn in Dutch Water Management , 2002 .

[11]  Glenn W. Suter,et al.  Communicating Ecological Indicators to Decision Makers and the Public , 2001 .

[12]  Susan Leigh Star,et al.  Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences , 1999 .

[13]  Hendrik van der Windt.  En dan: Wat is natuur nog in dit land?: Natuurbescherming in Nederland 1880-1990 , 1995 .

[14]  Ben ten Brink,et al.  The AMOEBA approach as a useful tool for establishing sustainable development , 1991 .

[15]  Susan Leigh Star,et al.  Institutional Ecology, `Translations' and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39 , 1989 .