Seismic Fragility of Continuous Steel Highway Bridges in New York State

This paper presents results of an analytical seismic fragility analysis of a typical steel highway bridge in New York State. The structural type and topological layout of this multispan I-girder bridge have been identified to be most typical of continuous bridges in New York State. The structural details of the bridge are designed as per New York State bridge design guidelines. Uncertainties associated with the estimation of material strength, bridge mass, friction coefficient of expansion bearings, and expansion-joint gap size are considered. To account for the uncertainties related to the bridge structural properties and earthquake characteristics, 10 statistical bridge samples are established using the Latin Hypercube sampling and restricted pairing approach, and 100 ground motions are simulated numerically. The uncertainties of capacity and demand are estimated simultaneously by using ratios of demands to capacities at different limit states to construct seismic fragility curves as a function of peak ground acceleration and fragility surfaces as a function of moment magnitude and epicentral distance for individual components using nonlinear and multivariate regressions. It has been observed that nonlinear and multivariate regressions show better fit to bridge response data than linear regression conventionally used. To account for seismic risk from multiple failure modes, second-order reliability yields narrower bounds than the commonly used first-order reliability method. The fragility curves and surfaces obtained from this analysis demonstrate that bridges in New York State have reasonably low likelihood of collapse during expected earthquakes.

[1]  Reginald DesRoches,et al.  Seismic fragility of typical bridges in moderate seismic zones , 2004 .

[2]  Fumio Yamazaki,et al.  Earthquake Damage Assessment of Expressway Bridges in Japan , 1999 .

[3]  Renzo Rosso,et al.  Statistics, Probability and Reliability for Civil and Environmental Engineers , 1997 .

[4]  Mjn Priestley,et al.  Seismic Design and Retrofit of Bridges , 1996 .

[5]  edited by Hans F. Winterkorn Hsai-Yang Fang Foundation Engineering Handbook , 2017 .

[6]  S. Harmsen,et al.  Deaggregation of probabilistic ground motions in the central and eastern United States , 1999 .

[7]  H Y Kim,et al.  STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF FRAGILITY CURVES , 2000 .

[8]  Chu-Kia Wang,et al.  Reinforced Concrete Design , 1965 .

[9]  Robert E. Melchers,et al.  Structural Reliability: Analysis and Prediction , 1987 .

[10]  C. Cornell Bounds on the Reliability of Structural Systems , 1967 .

[11]  Howard H. M. Hwang,et al.  Seismic Fragility Analysis of Highway Bridges , 2001 .

[12]  Eunsoo Choi,et al.  Seismic analysis and retrofit of mid-America bridges , 2002 .

[13]  John B. Mander,et al.  Observed Stress‐Strain Behavior of Confined Concrete , 1988 .

[14]  Andrzej S. Nowak,et al.  CALIBRATION OF LRFD BRIDGE DESIGN CODE , 1999 .

[15]  N. T. Kottegoda,et al.  Probability, Statistics, and Reliability for Civil and Environmental Engineers , 1997 .

[16]  G. D. Wyss,et al.  A user`s guide to LHS: Sandia`s Latin Hypercube Sampling Software , 1998 .

[17]  Masanobu Shinozuka,et al.  Nonlinear Static Procedure for Fragility Curve Development , 2000 .

[18]  Wilson H. Tang,et al.  Probability concepts in engineering planning and design , 1984 .

[19]  R V Nutt,et al.  IMPROVED SEISMIC DESIGN CRITERIA FOR CALIFORNIA BRIDGES: PROVISIONAL RECOMMENDATIONS , 1996 .

[20]  Ying Pan Seismic fragility and risk management of highway bridges in New York State , 2007 .