Transverse failure of carbon fiber composites: Analytical sensitivity to the distribution of fiber/matrix interface properties

An analytic differentiation method is presented to calculate the sensitivity of the transverse failure response of carbon fiber composite laminates to the distribution parameters of the fiber/matrix interface properties. The method starts with the evaluation of the sensitivities of the transverse failure response with respect to the interface properties of each fiber, ie, the cohesive failure strength and the critical displacement jump. These individual sensitivities are then used to calculate the sensitivities with respect to the mean and standard deviation of the interface properties. The derived sensitivities are implemented in a nonlinear interface‐enriched generalized finite element method solver specially developed for this application. The interface‐enriched generalized finite element method solver combines a cohesive modeling of the fiber/matrix interface failure with finite element meshes that do not conform to the composite microstructure. The approach is first demonstrated on a model material involving a one‐dimensional domain containing N cohesive interfaces described by randomly selected cohesive failure properties. The method is then applied to the more complex problem of a composite laminate involving a large number of fibers.

[1]  Jasbir S. Arora,et al.  Structural design sensitivity analysis of nonlinear response , 1985 .

[2]  R. Haftka,et al.  Sensitivity Analysis of Discrete Structural Systems , 1986 .

[3]  E. Gamstedt,et al.  Micromechanisms in tension-compression fatigue of composite laminates containing transverse plies , 1999 .

[4]  M. Ortiz,et al.  FINITE-DEFORMATION IRREVERSIBLE COHESIVE ELEMENTS FOR THREE-DIMENSIONAL CRACK-PROPAGATION ANALYSIS , 1999 .

[5]  Jacob Fish,et al.  Multiscale analytical sensitivity analysis for composite materials , 2001 .

[6]  M. Kaminski Sensitivity analysis of homogenized characteristics for some elastic composites , 2003 .

[7]  R. Haftka,et al.  Review of options for structural design sensitivity analysis. Part 1: Linear systems , 2005 .

[8]  Masaki Hojo,et al.  Evaluation of interfacial strength in CF/epoxies using FEM and in-situ experiments , 2006 .

[9]  Marcin Kamiński,et al.  Sensitivity and randomness in homogenization of periodic fiber-reinforced composites via the response function method , 2009 .

[10]  Philippe H. Geubelle,et al.  An interface‐enriched generalized FEM for problems with discontinuous gradient fields , 2012 .

[11]  Philippe H. Geubelle,et al.  A 3D interface-enriched generalized finite element method for weakly discontinuous problems with complex internal geometries , 2012 .

[12]  Masoud Safdari,et al.  A gradient-based shape optimization scheme using an interface-enriched generalized FEM , 2015 .

[13]  Luca Weisz,et al.  Design Sensitivity Analysis Of Structural Systems , 2016 .

[14]  Susanne Ebersbach,et al.  Engineering Mechanics Of Composite Materials , 2016 .

[15]  Masoud Safdari,et al.  Material Design Using a NURBS-based Shape Optimization , 2016 .

[16]  Philippe H. Geubelle,et al.  Multiscale sensitivity analysis of failure in composite materials using an interface-enriched generalized FEM , 2017 .

[17]  C. Montgomery Multiscale characterization of carbon fiber-reinforced epoxy composites , 2018 .

[18]  M. Kaminski,et al.  Homogenization of carbon/polymer composites with anisotropic distribution of particles and stochastic interface defects , 2018, Acta Mechanica.

[19]  David R. Brandyberry,et al.  Transverse Failure of Unidirectional Composites: Sensitivity to Interfacial Properties , 2020 .