Productivity and radiation use efficiency of lettuces grown in the partial shade of photovoltaic panels

Combining photovoltaic panels (PVPs) and crops on the same land unit were recently proposed as an alternative to the conversion of cropland into photovoltaic plants. This could alleviate the increasing competition for land between food and energy production. In such agrivoltaic systems, an upper layer of PVPs partially shades crops at ground level. The aim of this work was to (i) assess the effect on crop yield of two PVPs densities, resulting in two shade levels equal to 50% and 70% of the incoming radiation and (ii) identify morphological and physiological determinants of the plant response to shade. Experiments were conducted on four varieties of lettuces (two crisphead lettuces and two cutting lettuces), during two seasons. In all cases, the relative lettuce yield at harvest was equal or higher than the available relative radiation. Lettuce yield was maintained through an improved Radiation Interception Efficiency (RIE) in the shade, while Radiation Conversion Efficiency (RCE) did not change significantly. Enhanced RIE was explained by (i) an increase in the total leaf area per plant, despite a decrease in the number of leaves and (ii) a different distribution of leaf area among the pool of leaves, the maximal size of leaves increasing in the shade. Our result provides a framework for the selection of adapted varieties according to their morphological traits and physiological responses to PVP shade, in order to optimize agrivoltaic systems.

[1]  I. Nijs,et al.  Which plant traits promote growth in the low-light regimes of vegetation gaps? , 2009, Plant Ecology.

[2]  H. Holsteijn.  Growth of lettuce. I. Covering of soil surface , 1980 .

[3]  A. Hall,et al.  Grain number in sunflower as affected by shading during floret growth, anthesis and grain setting , 2004 .

[4]  W. Worku,et al.  Responses of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) to photosynthetic irradiance levels during three phenological phases , 2004 .

[5]  I. Wright,et al.  Are species shade and drought tolerance reflected in leaf-level structural and functional differentiation in Northern Hemisphere temperate woody flora? , 2009, The New phytologist.

[6]  D. Moot,et al.  Morphological, Anatomical, and Physiological Changes of Orchardgrass Leaves Grown under Fluctuating Light Regimes , 2007 .

[7]  Wim Turkenburg,et al.  Exploration of the ranges of the global potential of biomass for energy , 2003 .

[8]  F. Villalobos,et al.  Radiation interception, radiation-use efficiency and dry matter partitioning in garlic (Allium sativum L.) , 2002 .

[9]  Khalid Rehman Hakeem,et al.  Biomass and Bioenergy , 2014, Springer International Publishing.

[10]  A. Goetzberger,et al.  On the coexistence of solar-energy conversion and plant cultivation , 1982 .

[11]  L. S. Pereira,et al.  Crop evapotranspiration : guidelines for computing crop water requirements , 1998 .

[12]  L. Lynd,et al.  Beneficial Biofuels—The Food, Energy, and Environment Trilemma , 2009, Science.

[13]  K. Thompson,et al.  Specific leaf area and leaf dry matter content as alternative predictors of plant strategies , 1999 .

[14]  David Pimentel,et al.  Food Versus Biofuels: Environmental and Economic Costs , 2009 .

[15]  L. Poorter.  Light-dependent changes in biomass allocation and their importance for growth of rain forest tree species , 2001 .

[16]  D. Wurr,et al.  Environmental factors influencing head density and diameter of crisp lettuce cv. Saladin , 1992 .

[17]  M. Jeuffroy,et al.  Effect of nitrogen nutrition on growth and nitrate accumulation in lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.), under various conditions of radiation and temperature , 2000 .

[18]  N. Castilla,et al.  Productivity of leaf and root vegetable crops under direct cover , 2002 .

[19]  Christian Dupraz,et al.  Combining solar photovoltaic panels and food crops for optimising land use: Towards new agrivoltaic schemes , 2011 .

[20]  R. Schaeffer,et al.  Land use competition for production of food and liquid biofuels: An analysis of the arguments in the current debate , 2010 .

[21]  D. Walker.  Biofuels – for better or worse? , 2010 .

[22]  R. C. Muchow,et al.  Radiation Use Efficiency , 1999 .

[23]  J. Monteith.  SOLAR RADIATION AND PRODUCTIVITY IN TROPICAL ECOSYSTEMS , 1972 .

[24]  Ü. Niinemets.  A review of light interception in plant stands from leaf to canopy in different plant functional types and in species with varying shade tolerance , 2010, Ecological Research.

[25]  Sanderine Nonhebel,et al.  Renewable energy and food supply: will there be enough land? , 2005 .

[26]  R. Hunt,et al.  Integrated Analysis of Growth and Light Interception in Winter Lettuce I. Analytical Methods and Environmental Influences , 1984 .

[27]  L. Poorter,et al.  Causes and consequences of variation in leaf mass per area (LMA): a meta-analysis. , 2009, The New phytologist.

[28]  Andrej Pázman,et al.  Nonlinear Regression , 2019, Handbook of Regression Analysis With Applications in R.

[29]  Electo Eduardo Silva Lora,et al.  Biofuels: Environment, technology and food security , 2009 .

[30]  J. Bensink.  On morphogenesis of lettuce leaves in relation to light and temperature , 1971 .

[31]  D. P. Aikman,et al.  Growth of Lettuce, Onion, and Red Beet. 1. Growth Analysis, Light Interception, and Radiation Use Efficiency , 1996 .

[32]  Eric Lebon,et al.  A model-based diagnosis tool to evaluate the water stress experienced by grapevine in field sites , 2006 .

[33]  J. Monteith.  Climate and the efficiency of crop production in Britain , 1977 .

[34]  H. H. Ku.  Notes on the Use of Propagation of Error Formulas , 2010 .

[35]  Toyoki Kozai,et al.  Photosynthetic Photon Flux, Photoperiod, and CO2 Concentration Affect Growth and Morphology of Lettuce Plug Transplants , 1998 .