Influence of roughness and capillary size on the zeta potential values obtained by streaming potential measurements

Streaming potential measurements are performed to determine the zeta potential of flat surfaces, particles, or fibers. Although the zeta potential is a well‐defined property of solid surfaces in a liquid, there are indications that the absolute values of the zeta potential calculated using the Helmholtz‐Smoluchowski equation are affected by surface roughness and—in case of particle or fiber assemblies—their packing density. The study at hand investigates these influences using flat polymer surfaces with different roughness and topography and assemblies of basalt spheres. It was found that increasing roughness of the flat surface and larger size or smaller number of particles in particle assemblies result in flatter slopes of the streaming potential versus pressure and thus lower apparent absolute values of the zeta potential. The interpretation of streaming potential measurements should therefore not focus on absolute zeta potential values but on trends in pH‐ and concentration‐dependent measurements.

[1]  V. Mechtcherine,et al.  Surface modification of poly(vinyl alcohol) fibers to control the fiber-matrix interaction in composites , 2019, Colloid and Polymer Science.

[2]  V. Mechtcherine,et al.  Surface Modification of Polymeric Fibers to Control the Interactions with Cement-Based Matrices in Fiber-Reinforced Composites , 2019, Key Engineering Materials.

[3]  A. Synytska,et al.  Controlled and tunable design of polymer interface for immobilization of enzymes: does curvature matter? , 2017, Soft matter.

[4]  S. Michel,et al.  Tailoring the Surface Properties of Silicone Elastomers to Improve Adhesion of Epoxy Topcoat , 2011 .

[5]  F. Kremer,et al.  Interaction forces between microsized silica particles and weak polyelectrolyte brushes at varying pH and salt concentration. , 2010, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[6]  P. Adler,et al.  Electrokinetic phenomena in wavy channels. , 2010, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[7]  A. Drechsler,et al.  Electrokinetic investigation of surfactant adsorption. , 2007, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[8]  R. J. Hunter,et al.  Measurement and Interpretation of Electrokinetic Phenomena (IUPAC Technical Report) , 2005 .

[9]  C. Werner,et al.  Electrokinetic microslit experiments to analyse the charge formation at solid/liquid interfaces , 2006 .

[10]  J. Lyklema,et al.  Measurement and Interpretation of Electrokinetic Phenomena (IUPAC Technical Report) , 2005 .

[11]  M. Zembala Electrokinetics of heterogeneous interfaces. , 2004, Advances in colloid and interface science.

[12]  Christine Steinbach,et al.  Characterization of weak polyelectrolytes in aqueous solution-charge and isoelectric point in dependence on the molecule structure , 2017 .

[13]  Karina Grundke,et al.  Characterization of Polymer Surfaces by Wetting and Electrokinetic Measurements – Contact Angle, Interfacial Tension, Zeta Potential , 2008 .