Developing a computerised search to help UK General Practices identify more patients for palliative care planning: a feasibility study

BackgroundApproximately 600,000 people die in the UK annually, usually after months or years of increasing debility. Many patients with advanced conditions are not identified for appropriate support before they die because they are not seen as having “palliative” care needs. General practice information technology systems can improve care by identifying patients with deteriorating health so that their healthcare needs can be reviewed more systematically and effectively. The aim was to develop and test a computerised search of primary care records in routine clinical practice as a tool to improve patient identification for a palliative care approach.MethodsAn iterative process of search design and testing followed by implementation and extended testing of the search output in clinical practice. A three-phase feasibility study: developing a computerised search, determining its ability to identify patients with deteriorating health from any advanced condition, and assessing how primary care clinicians use the results to improve patient care. The setting was twelve primary care teams in two Health Boards in Scotland.ResultsThe search identified 0.6–1.7 % of patients in each practice who were not already on the palliative care register. Primary care clinicians judged that 30–60 % of these patients were at risk of dying or deterioration over the next 6–12 months. The most common action taken by GPs was to start an electronic anticipatory care plan.ConclusionsIt is possible to significantly improve the identification of patients for palliative care needs assessment using a computerised search however barriers remain to GPs’ finding it acceptable. Time-efficient systems were important as was a generic tool for anticipatory care planning not linked to ‘palliative’ care.

[1]  S. Murray,et al.  Using the ‘surprise question’ can identify people with advanced heart failure and COPD who would benefit from a palliative care approach , 2011, Palliative medicine.

[2]  P. Selwyn,et al.  The Early Identification of Palliative Care Patients: Preliminary Processes and Estimates From Urban, Family Medicine Practices , 2007, The American journal of hospice & palliative care.

[3]  Susan Michie,et al.  Developing and Evaluating Complex Interventions , 2015 .

[4]  Siw Carlfjord,et al.  Key factors influencing adoption of an innovation in primary health care: a qualitative study based on implementation theory , 2010, BMC family practice.

[5]  X. Gómez-Batiste,et al.  Identifying patients with chronic conditions in need of palliative care in the general population: development of the NECPAL tool and preliminary prevalence rates in Catalonia , 2012, BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care.

[6]  Sandi Cayless,et al.  Telehealth in palliative care in the UK: a review of the evidence , 2010, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[7]  S. Murray,et al.  What tools are available to identify patients with palliative care needs in primary care: a systematic literature review and survey of European practice , 2013, BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care.

[8]  D P Sulmasy,et al.  End-of-life care. , 1997, JAMA.

[9]  S. Murray,et al.  Development and evaluation of the Supportive and Palliative Care Indicators Tool (SPICT): a mixed-methods study , 2013, BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care.

[10]  A. Sheikh,et al.  Developing primary palliative care , 2004, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[11]  Maria Jirwe,et al.  Analysing qualitative data. , 2011, Nurse researcher.

[12]  S. Murray,et al.  Are UK primary care teams formally identifying patients for palliative care before they die? , 2012, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[13]  I. Higginson,et al.  How many people need palliative care? A study developing and comparing methods for population-based estimates , 2014, Palliative medicine.

[14]  I. Higginson,et al.  Improving generalist end of life care: national consultation with practitioners, commissioners, academics, and service user groups , 2008, BMJ : British Medical Journal.