Evaluation of muscle force prediction models of the lumbar trunk using surface electromyography

Optimization‐based models for prediction of muscle forces in the lumbar region of the torso are used to estimate the forces acting on spinal motion segments, especially for asymmetric tasks. The objectives of this study were to determine (a) which of four torso model formulations best predicted the electromyographic data, (b) the difference in muscular contribution to spinal compression force for the four models, and (c) the effect of using the lowest possible muscle stress bound in the model formulation. An approach for the investigation of competing optimization model formulations was developed and was illustrated with electromyographic data from static asymmetric loading conditions. This method is based on (a) the choice of experimental conditions in which models predict decidedly different muscle forces, and (b) the ability to ensure that the experimental conditions are such that the minimum number of assumptions about the force‐electromyogram relationship must be made in order to choose between competing model predictions. Of the four models analyzed, only the formulation with an objective function that was the sum of cubed muscle stresses predicted the electromyographic data acceptably. The muscular contribution to spinal compression force predicted by these models differed by as much as 160% for some experimental conditions. The use of the lowest possible muscle stress bound does not appear to predict muscle forces that are in agreement with electromyographic data.

[1]  A B Schultz,et al.  Biomechanical model calculation of muscle contraction forces: a double linear programming method. , 1988, Journal of biomechanics.

[2]  D B Chaffin,et al.  Lumbar muscle size and locations from CT scans of 96 women of age 40 to 63 years. , 1990, Clinical biomechanics.

[3]  A. Pellionisz,et al.  Tensorial approach to the geometry of brain function: Cerebellar coordination via a metric tensor , 1980, Neuroscience.

[4]  Steven A. Lavender,et al.  Coactivation of the Trunk Muscles during Asymmetric Loading of the Torso , 1992, Human factors.

[5]  A. Schultz,et al.  The Activity of Individual Trunk Muscles During Heavy Physical Loading , 1987, Spine.

[6]  R W Norman,et al.  Measurement of the trunk musculature of active males using CT scan radiography: implications for force and moment generating capacity about the L4/L5 joint. , 1988, Journal of biomechanics.

[7]  M. Tracy,et al.  The Geometry of the Muscles of the Lumbar Spine Determined by Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 1989, Spine.

[8]  R. Norman,et al.  1986 Volvo Award in Biomechanics: Partitioning of the L4 - L5 Dynamic Moment into Disc, Ligamentous, and Muscular Components During Lifting , 1986, Spine.

[9]  R. Crowninshield,et al.  A physiologically based criterion of muscle force prediction in locomotion. , 1981, Journal of biomechanics.

[10]  M. Pope,et al.  The relationship between trunk muscle electromyography and lifting moments in the sagittal and frontal planes. , 1987, Journal of biomechanics.

[11]  Z. Ladin,et al.  1989 Volvo Award in Biomechanics: Mechanical Recruitment of Low-Back Muscles: Theoretical Predictions and Experimental Validation , 1989, Spine.

[12]  W S Marras,et al.  Simulift: A Simulation Model of Human Trunk Motion , 1989, Spine.

[13]  H. Hatze,et al.  Neuromusculoskeletal control systems modeling--A critical survey of recent developments , 1980 .

[14]  J Perry,et al.  EMG-force relationships in skeletal muscle. , 1981, Critical reviews in biomedical engineering.

[15]  C J De Luca,et al.  The effects of external bending moments on lumbar muscle force distribution. , 1991, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[16]  A Schultz,et al.  Use of lumbar trunk muscles in isometric performance of mechanically complex standing tasks , 1983, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[17]  A. Schultz,et al.  Lumbar trunk muscle use in standing isometric heavy exertions , 1987, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[18]  C. Gielen,et al.  Coordination of arm muscles during flexion and supination: Application of the tensor analysis approach , 1986, Neuroscience.

[19]  A. Pellionisz,et al.  Space-time representation in the brain. The cerebellum as a predictive space-time metric tensor , 1982, Neuroscience.

[20]  M Gagnon,et al.  A Three‐Dimensional Digitization Method to Measure Trunk Muscle Lines of Action , 1988, Spine.