The impact of cue format and cue transparency on task switching performance

Cues help in retrieving and implementing task-sets, that are actual representations of the to-be performed task in working memory. However, whereas previous studies revealed that the effectiveness of selecting and implementing task-sets based on cues depends on the type of cue (i.e., transparent words vs. arbitrary shapes), it is still unclear which characteristics of cues are responsible for these differences and whether the impact of the cue is bound to task-set retrieval only or also impacts task-set representations. For instance, the amount of interference during actual task performance has been reported to alter dependent on cue type as do preparation gains such as the reduction of switch cost. To investigate the effectiveness of cue characteristics (i.e., cue transparency and cue format), we manipulated those within- and between-participants in three experiments. Main dependent measures were switch costs in reaction times and error rates that occur when participants have to switch task-sets, and thus update working memory content. Our results consistently show beneficial effects of transparent cues for the reduction of switch cost. The influence of cue format was manifest in within-participants manipulation only and was mainly found in error rates. Overall, our data suggest that the amount of interference experienced in actual task performance can be significantly modulated dependent on cue type, suggesting flexible adaptation of the cognitive system to contextual information.

[1]  T. Goschke,et al.  Executive control emerging from dynamic interactions between brain systems mediating language, working memory and attentional processes. , 2004, Acta psychologica.

[2]  S. Monsell,et al.  Costs of a predictible switch between simple cognitive tasks. , 1995 .

[3]  B. J. Winer Statistical Principles in Experimental Design , 1992 .

[4]  I. Koch,et al.  Dissociating cue-related and task-related processes in task inhibition: evidence from using a 2:1 cue-to-task mapping. , 2008, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[5]  T. Goschke Intentional reconfiguration and involuntary persistence in task-set switching , 2000 .

[6]  Andrea M Philipp,et al.  Control and interference in task switching--a review. , 2010, Psychological bulletin.

[7]  G. Logan,et al.  Clever homunculus: is there an endogenous act of control in the explicit task-cuing procedure? , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[8]  Marco Steinhauser,et al.  Response-based strengthening in task shifting: evidence from shift effects produced by errors. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[9]  Hannes Ruge,et al.  Frontostriatal Mechanisms in Instruction-Based Learning as a Hallmark of Flexible Goal-Directed Behavior , 2012, Front. Psychology.

[10]  Marco Steinhauser,et al.  Distractor onset but not preparation time affects the frequency of task confusions in task switching , 2015, Front. Psychol..

[11]  K. Oberauer,et al.  Should We Stop Thinking About Inhibition? Searching for Individual and Age Differences in Inhibition Ability , 2017, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[12]  Michael W. Cole,et al.  The power of instructions: Proactive configuration of stimulus-response translation. , 2015, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[13]  Ulrich Mayr,et al.  Control of task sequences: what is the role of language? , 2014, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[14]  Erik M Altmann,et al.  Advance Preparation in Task Switching , 2004, Psychological science.

[15]  A. Vandierendonck,et al.  Short cue presentations encourage advance task preparation: a recipe to diminish the residual switch cost. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[16]  M. Druey,et al.  The role of temporal cue-target overlap in backward inhibition under task switching , 2007, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[17]  Andrea M Philipp,et al.  The role of inhibition in task switching: A review , 2010, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[18]  Hannes Ruge,et al.  Rapid formation of pragmatic rule representations in the human brain during instruction-based learning. , 2010, Cerebral cortex.

[19]  Wolfgang Prinz,et al.  Embodied rules in tool use: a tool-switching study. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[20]  Ulrich Mayr Towards Principles of Executive Control: How Mental Sets are Selected , 2003 .

[21]  Stephen Monsell,et al.  Neurophysiological signature of effective anticipatory task‐set control: a task‐switching investigation , 2008, The European journal of neuroscience.

[22]  Frederick Verbruggen,et al.  Tscope: A C library for programming cognitive experiments on the MS Windows platform , 2006, Behavior research methods.

[23]  Darryl W. Schneider,et al.  Interpreting instructional cues in task switching procedures: the role of mediator retrieval. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[24]  Marcel Brass,et al.  Cross-talk of instructed and applied arbitrary visuomotor mappings. , 2008, Acta psychologica.

[25]  I. Koch,et al.  Explaining response-repetition effects in task switching: evidence from switching cue modality suggests episodic binding and response inhibition , 2018, Psychological research.

[26]  R. D. Gordon,et al.  Executive control of visual attention in dual-task situations. , 2001, Psychological review.

[27]  I. Koch,et al.  Cue–task associations in task switching , 2007, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[28]  Andrea Kiesel,et al.  Cognitive Structure, Flexibility, and Plasticity in Human Multitasking—An Integrative Review of Dual-Task and Task-Switching Research , 2018, Psychological bulletin.

[29]  I. Koch,et al.  Inhibitory control in task switching , 2014 .

[30]  M. Brass,et al.  A Review of the Role of Cue Processing in Task Switching , 2013 .

[31]  M. J. Emerson,et al.  Inner speech as a retrieval aid for task goals: the effects of cue type and articulatory suppression in the random task cuing paradigm. , 2004, Acta psychologica.

[32]  D. W. Schneider Investigating a method for reducing residual switch costs in cued task switching , 2016, Memory & cognition.

[33]  B. Hommel,et al.  Towards a Unitary Approach to Human Action Control , 2017, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[34]  A. Vandierendonck,et al.  Task switching: interplay of reconfiguration and interference control. , 2010, Psychological bulletin.

[35]  M. J. Emerson,et al.  The role of inner speech in task switching: A dual-task investigation , 2003 .

[36]  Clara D. Martin,et al.  Where is the bilingual advantage in task-switching? , 2013 .

[37]  B. Hommel The prepared reflex: Automaticity and control in stimulus-response translation , 2000 .

[38]  Klaus Oberauer,et al.  Design for a working memory. , 2009 .

[39]  Nachshon Meiran,et al.  The representation of instructions operates like a prepared reflex: flanker compatibility effects found in first trial following S-R instructions. , 2009, Experimental psychology.

[40]  Maurits W van der Molen,et al.  Preparation for speeded action as a psychophysiological concept. , 2005, Psychological bulletin.

[41]  B. Hommel Action control according to TEC (theory of event coding) , 2009, Psychological research.

[42]  Nachshon Meiran,et al.  The representation of instructions in working memory leads to autonomous response activation: Evidence from the first trials in the flanker paradigm , 2006, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[43]  Comparative judgments of symbolic and non-symbolic stimuli yield different patterns of reaction times. , 2013, Acta psychologica.

[44]  A Baddeley,et al.  Working memory and the control of action: evidence from task switching. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[45]  Catherine M Arrington,et al.  Separating cue encoding from target processing in the explicit task-cuing procedure: are there "true" task switch effects? , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[46]  George Houghton,et al.  Task Switching and Cognitive Control , 2014 .

[47]  I. Koch,et al.  Cue type affects preparatory influences on task inhibition. , 2014, Acta psychologica.

[48]  I. Koch,et al.  Intentional preparation of auditory attention-switches: Explicit cueing and sequential switch-predictability , 2018, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[49]  R. Kliegl,et al.  Task-set switching and long-term memory retrieval. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[50]  K. Arbuthnott The influence of cue type on backward inhibition. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[51]  J. Grange,et al.  Heightened conflict in cue-target translation increases backward inhibition in set switching. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[52]  J. G. Snodgrass,et al.  A standardized set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory.

[53]  U. Mayr,et al.  Outsourcing control to the environment: effects of stimulus/response locations on task selection , 2007, Psychological research.

[54]  Stephen Monsell,et al.  Can the task-cuing paradigm measure an endogenous task-set reconfiguration process? , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[55]  J. Houwer,et al.  Instruction-based response activation depends on task preparation , 2013, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[56]  Wayne D. Gray,et al.  An integrated model of cognitive control in task switching. , 2008, Psychological review.

[57]  E. M. Altmann,et al.  Cue-independent task-specific representations in task switching: evidence from backward inhibition. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[58]  D. A. Taylor,et al.  The cuing and priming of cognitive operations. , 1987, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[59]  Gordon D. Logan,et al.  Contextual control over task-set retrieval , 2010 .