Multiple-Objective Decision Analysis Involving Multiple Stakeholders

Many operations researchers know about the use of decision analysis to help decide among alternative investments (such as pharmacological research and development investments) using decision trees with chance nodes to compute expected monetary value or return on investment of different alternatives.Such an analysis often aims to maximize a single evaluation measure for a single decision maker.We demonstrate less widely known decision analysis techniques using spreadsheet models that will help analysts understand and model the multiple objective perspectives of the stakeholders to a decision.Using this approach can aid in identifying mutually agreeable alternative actions, designing new and better alternatives, and foreseeing opposition to decisions. It can also help analysts understand the evolution of past decisions from multiple perspectives. In some cases, one objectives hierarchy can be suitable for a set of stakeholders, and differences in opinions across stakeholders can be characterized by differences in weights on the multiple objectives.Examples include the analysis for the merger of the Operations Research Society of America and The Institute of Management Sciences to become INFORMS, Arizona water resources planning, and planning for protection against radioactive iodine releases in nuclear incidents.In other cases, an objectives hierarchy will be constructed for each stakeholder because their objectives are so different that construction of separate hierarchies better represents their divergent perspectives.Examples include a tuna fish supplier source selection decision (from the perspectives of StarKist, environmentalists, and the San Diego tuna fishing fleet), the potential siting of a new Home Depot in San Juan Capistrano (from the perspectives of Home Depot, the city, residents, and competing or complementary small businesses), and a prostate cancer treatment decision (from the perspectives of former Intel CEO Andy Grove, his family, his company, and his doctors).

[1]  James L. Corner,et al.  Decision Analysis Applications in the Operations Research Literature, 1970-1989 , 1991, Oper. Res..

[2]  Jason R. W. Merrick,et al.  A Multiple-Objective Decision Analysis of Stakeholder Values to Identify Watershed Improvement Needs , 2005, Decis. Anal..

[3]  L. Robin Keller,et al.  A Multiple-Objective Decision Analysis for Terrorism Protection: Potassium Iodide Distribution in Nuclear Incidents , 2006, Decis. Anal..

[4]  Jay R. Simon,et al.  Decision Making with Prostate Cancer: A Multiple-Objective Model with Uncertainty , 2009, Interfaces.

[5]  Dennis M. Buede Structuring Value Attributes , 1986 .

[6]  L. Robin Keller,et al.  The Founding of INFORMS: A Decision Analysis Perspective , 1999, Oper. Res..

[7]  Donald A. Keefer,et al.  Decision Analysis Applications in the Operations Research Literature , 1990 .

[8]  Robert T. Clemen,et al.  Making Hard Decisions: An Introduction to Decision Analysis , 1997 .

[9]  Craig W. Kirkwood,et al.  Strategic decision making : multiobjective decision analysis with spreadsheets : instructor's manual , 1996 .

[10]  Jason R. W. Merrick,et al.  Using Value-Focused Thinking to Improve Watersheds , 2004 .

[11]  Monika I. Winn,et al.  A Modeling Methodology for Multiobjective Multistakeholder Decisions , 2001 .

[12]  R. L. Keeney,et al.  Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-Offs , 1977, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[13]  Joanna L. Y. Ho,et al.  Decision problem structuring: generating options , 1988, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[14]  L. Robin Keller,et al.  Assessing stakeholder evaluation concerns: An application to the Central Arizona water resources system , 2010, Syst. Eng..

[15]  John C. Butler,et al.  Enabling e-transactions with multi-attribute preference models , 2008, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[16]  Stuart P. Eriksen,et al.  A Multiattribute-utility-function Approach to Weighing the Risks and Benefits of Pharmaceutical Agents , 1993, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[17]  L. Robin Keller,et al.  A Conceptual Framework for Multiple Stakeholder Educational Decision Making , 2006 .

[18]  D. Winterfeldt Value Tree Analysis: An Introduction and an Application to Offshore Oil Drilling , 1987 .

[19]  Ralph L. Keeney,et al.  Value-Focused Thinking: A Path to Creative Decisionmaking , 1992 .

[20]  Ralph L. Keeney,et al.  Structuring West Germany's energy objectives , 1987 .

[21]  Monika I. Winn,et al.  Harnessing Complexity, Idiosyncrasy and Time: A Modeling Methodology for Corporate Multi-Stakeholder Decisions , 1999 .

[22]  D. Winterfeldt,et al.  Comparison of weighting judgments in multiattribute utility measurement , 1991 .

[23]  James S. Dyer,et al.  Using multiple objectives to approximate normative models , 1984, Ann. Oper. Res..

[24]  L. Robin Keller,et al.  Modeling Multi-Objective Multi-Stakeholder Decisions: A Case-Exercise Approach , 2008, INFORMS Trans. Educ..

[25]  F. B. Vernadat,et al.  Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs , 1994 .