Visual expertise with nonface objects leads to competition with the early perceptual processing of faces in the human occipitotemporal cortex.

Human electrophysiological studies have found that the processing of faces and other objects differs reliably at approximately 150 ms after stimulus onset, faces giving rise to a larger occipitotemporal field potential on the scalp, termed the N170. We hypothesize that visual expertise with nonface objects leads to the recruitment of early face-related categorization processes in the occipitotemporal cortex, as reflected by the N170. To test this hypothesis, the N170 in response to laterally presented faces was measured while subjects concurrently viewed centrally presented, novel, nonface objects (asymmetric "Greebles"). The task was simply to report the side of the screen on which each face was presented. Five subjects were tested during three event-related potential sessions interspersed throughout a training protocol during which they became experts with Greebles. After expertise training, the N170 in response to faces was substantially decreased ( approximately 20% decrease in signal relative to that when subjects were novices) when concurrently processing a nonface object in the domain of expertise, but not when processing untrained objects of similar complexity. Thus, faces and nonface objects in a domain of expertise compete for early visual categorization processes in the occipitotemporal cortex.

[1]  Minami Ito,et al.  Columns for visual features of objects in monkey inferotemporal cortex , 1992, Nature.

[2]  G. Woodman,et al.  Event-related potential studies of attention , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[3]  Keiji Tanaka,et al.  Optical Imaging of Functional Organization in the Monkey Inferotemporal Cortex , 1996, Science.

[4]  D I Perrett,et al.  Organization and functions of cells responsive to faces in the temporal cortex. , 1992, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[5]  T. Allison,et al.  Electrophysiological Studies of Face Perception in Humans , 1996, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[6]  I. Gauthier,et al.  Perceptual interference supports a non-modular account of face processing , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[7]  D. Maurer,et al.  The many faces of configural processing , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[8]  E. Halgren,et al.  Cognitive response profile of the human fusiform face area as determined by MEG. , 2000, Cerebral cortex.

[9]  A. Young,et al.  Handbook of Research on Face Processing , 1989 .

[10]  T. Allison,et al.  Electrophysiological studies of human face perception. I: Potentials generated in occipitotemporal cortex by face and non-face stimuli. , 1999, Cerebral cortex.

[11]  O. Terasaki,et al.  Transcallosal conduction time measured by visual hemifield stimulation with face images , 2002, Neuroreport.

[12]  I. Fujita,et al.  Neuronal mechanisms of selectivity for object features revealed by blocking inhibition in inferotemporal cortex , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[13]  M. Tarr,et al.  Expertise Training with Novel Objects Leads to Left-Lateralized Facelike Electrophysiological Responses , 2002, Psychological science.

[14]  Ken A. Paller,et al.  Frontal Brain Activity during Episodic and Semantic Retrieval: Insights from Event-Related Potentials , 1999, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[15]  M. Farah,et al.  What is "special" about face perception? , 1998, Psychological review.

[16]  M. Tarr,et al.  Training ‘greeble’ experts: a framework for studying expert object recognition processes , 1998, Vision Research.

[17]  M. Tarr,et al.  The N170 occipito‐temporal component is delayed and enhanced to inverted faces but not to inverted objects: an electrophysiological account of face‐specific processes in the human brain , 2000, Neuroreport.

[18]  K. Bötzel,et al.  Scalp topography and analysis of intracranial sources of face-evoked potentials , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[19]  S. Bentin,et al.  Domain specificity versus expertise: factors influencing distinct processing of faces , 2002, Cognition.

[20]  Aina Puce,et al.  Category-sensitive excitatory and inhibitory processes in human extrastriate cortex. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[21]  E. Miller,et al.  Suppression of visual responses of neurons in inferior temporal cortex of the awake macaque by addition of a second stimulus , 1993, Brain Research.

[22]  M. Tovée,et al.  The responses of single neurons in the temporal visual cortical areas of the macaque when more than one stimulus is present in the receptive field , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[23]  I. Gauthier,et al.  A defense of the subordinate-level expertise account for the N170 component , 2002, Cognition.

[24]  Keiji Tanaka,et al.  Inferotemporal cortex and object vision. , 1996, Annual review of neuroscience.

[25]  M. Tarr,et al.  Becoming a “Greeble” Expert: Exploring Mechanisms for Face Recognition , 1997, Vision Research.

[26]  Margot J. Taylor,et al.  Is the face‐sensitive N170 the only ERP not affected by selective attention? , 2000, Neuroreport.

[27]  J. Haxby,et al.  The distributed human neural system for face perception , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[28]  R. Henson,et al.  Electrophysiological and haemodynamic correlates of face perception, recognition and priming. , 2003, Cerebral cortex.

[29]  A. Chaudhuri,et al.  What determines whether faces are special? , 2003 .

[30]  M. Tarr,et al.  FFA: a flexible fusiform area for subordinate-level visual processing automatized by expertise , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[31]  I. Gauthier,et al.  Expertise for cars and birds recruits brain areas involved in face recognition , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[32]  Denis Fize,et al.  Speed of processing in the human visual system , 1996, Nature.

[33]  J. Tanaka,et al.  A Neural Basis for Expert Object Recognition , 2001, Psychological science.

[34]  Bruno Rossion,et al.  Parametric design and correlational analyses help integrating fMRI and electrophysiological data during face processing , 2004, NeuroImage.

[35]  Isabel Gauthier,et al.  THE INFLUENCE OF CONCEPTUAL KNOWLEDGE ON VISUAL DISCRIMINATION , 2003, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[36]  Margot J. Taylor,et al.  N170 or N1? Spatiotemporal differences between object and face processing using ERPs. , 2004, Cerebral cortex.

[37]  Ravi S. Menon,et al.  Spatial and temporal limits in cognitive neuroimaging with fMRI , 1999, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[38]  N. Kanwisher.  Domain specificity in face perception , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.