Signal recognition by green treefrogs (Hyla cinerea) and Cope's gray treefrogs (Hyla chrysoscelis) in naturally fluctuating noise.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] H. Carl Gerhardt,et al. Sound pressure levels and radiation patterns of the vocalizations of some North American frogs and toads , 1975, Journal of comparative physiology.
[2] M. A. Bee,et al. The cocktail party problem: what is it? How can it be solved? And why should animal behaviorists study it? , 2008, Journal of comparative psychology.
[3] M. A. Bee,et al. Sound source segregation in grey treefrogs: spatial release from masking by the sound of a chorus , 2007, Animal Behaviour.
[4] B J Kwon,et al. Consonant identification under maskers with sinusoidal modulation: masking release or modulation interference? , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[5] Mark A. Bee,et al. Does common spatial origin promote the auditory grouping of temporally separated signal elements in grey treefrogs? , 2008, Animal Behaviour.
[6] REPRODUCTIVE CHARACTER DISPLACEMENT IN THE ACOUSTIC , 2003 .
[7] K. K. Jensen,et al. Comodulation detection differences in the hooded crow (Corvus corone cornix), with direct comparison to human subjects. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[8] Cory T. Miller,et al. Receiver psychology turns 20: is it time for a broader approach? , 2012, Animal Behaviour.
[9] R. Fay. Signal-to-noise ratio for source determination and for a comodulated masker in goldfish, Carassius auratus. , 2011, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[10] Mark A. Bee,et al. Dip listening and the cocktail party problem in grey treefrogs: signal recognition in temporally fluctuating noise , 2011, Animal Behaviour.
[11] M. A. Bee,et al. Dip listening or modulation masking? Call recognition by green treefrogs (Hyla cinerea) in temporally fluctuating noise , 2012, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.
[12] Johannes Schul,et al. Phonotaxis to male’s calls embedded within a chorus by female gray treefrogs, Hyla versicolor , 2010, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.
[13] R. Plomp,et al. Effects of fluctuating noise and interfering speech on the speech-reception threshold for impaired and normal hearing. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[14] J. Schul,et al. Non-parallel coevolution of sender and receiver in the acoustic communication system of treefrogs , 2002, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.
[15] Donald E. Kroodsma,et al. Suggested experimental designs for song playbacks , 1989, Animal Behaviour.
[16] H. Brumm,et al. Acoustic Communication in Noise , 2005 .
[17] Martin Cooke,et al. A glimpsing model of speech perception in noise. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[18] Michael S. Lewicki,et al. Efficient auditory coding , 2006, Nature.
[19] Todd M Freeberg,et al. Acoustic interaction in animal groups: signaling in noisy and social contexts. , 2008, Journal of comparative psychology.
[20] M. A. Bee,et al. Detecting modulated signals in modulated noise: (II) neural thresholds in the songbird forebrain , 2007, The European journal of neuroscience.
[21] G. Klump,et al. Comodulation masking release in a songbird , 1995, Hearing Research.
[22] Georg M. Klump,et al. Phonotactic responses and selectivity of barking treefrogs (Hyla gratiosa) to chorus sounds , 1988, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.
[23] J. T. Collins,et al. A Field Guide to Reptiles and Amphibians: Eastern and Central North America , 1975 .
[24] G. Klump,et al. Detecting modulated signals in modulated noise: (I) behavioural auditory thresholds in a songbird , 2007, The European journal of neuroscience.
[25] H. Gerhardt. Sound Pattern Recognition in Some North American Treefrogs (Anura: Hylidae): Implications for Mate Choice , 1982 .
[26] Bernd Fritzsch,et al. The Evolution of the amphibian auditory system , 1988 .
[27] H. Carl Gerhardt,et al. Acoustic communication in two groups of closely related treefrogs. , 2001 .
[28] Mark A. Bee,et al. Spatial release from masking in a free-field source identification task by gray treefrogs , 2012, Hearing Research.
[29] Israel Nelken,et al. Responses of auditory-cortex neurons to structural features of natural sounds , 1999, Nature.
[30] A. Feng,et al. Effects of Noise Bandwidth and Amplitude Modulation on Masking in Frog Auditory Midbrain Neurons , 2012, PloS one.
[31] W. Bialek,et al. Naturalistic stimuli increase the rate and efficiency of information transmission by primary auditory afferents , 1995, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.
[32] Mark A Bee,et al. Behavioral measures of signal recognition thresholds in frogs in the presence and absence of chorus-shaped noise. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[33] Mark A. Bee,et al. Chapter 6 Anuran Acoustic Signal Perception in Noisy Environments , 2013 .
[34] A. Nieder,et al. Signal detection in amplitude‐modulated maskers. II. Processing in the songbird's auditory forebrain , 2001, The European journal of neuroscience.
[35] Michael S. Lewicki,et al. Efficient coding of natural sounds , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.
[36] James J Finneran,et al. Comodulation masking release in bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus). , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[37] Ulrike Langemann,et al. Animal Communication Networks: Perception and acoustic communication networks , 2005 .
[38] S. Hofer,et al. Within- and Across-Channel Processing in Auditory Masking: A Physiological Study in the Songbird Forebrain , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.
[39] Mark A Bee,et al. Sound source perception in anuran amphibians , 2012, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.
[40] Roy D Patterson,et al. The mutual roles of temporal glimpsing and vocal characteristics in cocktail-party listening. , 2011, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[41] Mark A. Bee,et al. Finding Your Mate at a Cocktail Party: Frequency Separation Promotes Auditory Stream Segregation of Concurrent Voices in Multi-Species Frog Choruses , 2011, PloS one.
[42] Mark A Bee,et al. Sound level discrimination by gray treefrogs in the presence and absence of chorus-shaped noise. , 2012, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[43] H. Gerhardt,et al. Effects of heterospecific call overlap on the phonotactic behaviour of grey treefrogs , 2006, Animal Behaviour.
[44] R. H. Wiley,et al. Reverberations and Amplitude Fluctuations in the Propagation of Sound in a Forest: Implications for Animal Communication , 1980, The American Naturalist.
[45] H. Gerhardt,et al. REPRODUCTIVE CHARACTER DISPLACEMENT IN THE ACOUSTIC COMMUNICATION SYSTEM OF GREEN TREE FROGS (HYLA CINEREA) , 2003, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[46] H. Carl Gerhardt,et al. Phonotaxis in Female Frogs and Toads: Execution and Design of Experiments , 1995 .
[47] P. K. McGregor,et al. Animal Communication Networks: Behaviours specific to communication networks , 2005 .
[48] H. Gustafsson,et al. Masking of speech by amplitude-modulated noise , 1991 .
[49] Stewart H. Hulse,et al. Auditory scene analysis in animal communication , 2002 .
[50] Ryan C. Taylor,et al. Sexual selection in the squirrel treefrog Hyla squirella: the role of multimodal cue assessment in female choice , 2007, Animal Behaviour.
[51] Johannes Schul,et al. Pattern recognition and call preferences in treefrogs (Anura: Hylidae): a quantitative analysis using a no-choice paradigm , 2002, Animal Behaviour.
[52] H. Carl Gerhardt,et al. Spatially mediated release from auditory masking in an anuran amphibian , 1989, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.
[53] Mark A. Bee,et al. Do female frogs exploit inadvertent social information to locate breeding aggregations , 2007 .
[54] Mark A. Bee,et al. Anuran Acoustic Signal Production in Noisy Environments , 2013 .
[55] Ruth Y. Litovsky,et al. Spatial Release from Masking , 2012 .
[56] Mark A. Bee,et al. Finding a mate at a cocktail party: spatial release from masking improves acoustic mate recognition in grey treefrogs , 2008, Animal Behaviour.
[57] A. Feng,et al. Neural basis of sound pattern recognition in anurans , 1990, Progress in Neurobiology.
[58] M. A. Bee,et al. Assessing Acoustic Signal Variability and the Potential for Sexual Selection and Social Recognition in Boreal Chorus Frogs (Pseudacris maculata) , 2010 .
[59] D. Kroodsma,et al. Ecology and evolution of acoustic communication in birds , 1997 .
[60] P. Narins,et al. AM representation in green treefrog auditory nerve fibers: neuroethological implications for pattern recognition and sound localization , 2004, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.
[61] Frédéric Berthommier,et al. Masking release for consonant features in temporally fluctuating background noise , 2006, Hearing Research.
[62] J. Doherty,et al. Acoustic communication in the gray treefrog,Hyla versicolor: evolutionary and neurobiological implications , 1988, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.
[63] Mark A. Bee,et al. Selective phonotaxis by male wood frogs (Rana sylvatica) to the sound of a chorus , 2007, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.
[64] R. R. Capranica,et al. Processing amplitude-modulated sounds by the auditory midbrain of two species of toads: matched temporal filters , 1984, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.
[65] B. Moore,et al. Comodulation masking release (CMR) as a function of masker bandwidth, modulator bandwidth, and signal duration. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[66] S. Bacon,et al. The effects of hearing loss and noise masking on the masking release for speech in temporally complex backgrounds. , 1998, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.
[67] G. Klump,et al. Signal detection in amplitude‐modulated maskers. I. Behavioural auditory thresholds in a songbird , 2001, The European journal of neuroscience.
[68] Gary J. Rose,et al. Function of the Amphibian Central Auditory System , 2007 .
[69] B. Ronacher,et al. Influence of amplitude modulated noise on the recognition of communication signals in the grasshopper Chorthippus biguttulus , 2003, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.
[70] Alejandro Vélez,et al. Signal recognition by frogs in the presence of temporally fluctuating chorus-shaped noise , 2010, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.
[71] Anne Hsu,et al. Tuning for spectro-temporal modulations as a mechanism for auditory discrimination of natural sounds , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.
[72] Roger Conant,et al. A Field Guide to Reptiles and Amphibians , 1959 .
[73] D. Grantham,et al. Modulation masking: effects of modulation frequency, depth, and phase. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[74] D. Kroodsma. Using appropriate experimental designs for intended hypotheses in ‘song’ playbacks, with examples for testing effects of song repertoire sizes , 1990, Animal Behaviour.