Case-crossover designs in occupational health

Commentary on the paper by Schwartz (p. 956) The case-crossover design has become an accepted method for investigating acute health consequences of transient exposures, or “triggers”. This design, originally presented in 1991 by Maclure,1 can be thought of as a variant of the conventional case-control study with individual (pairwise) matching. The principal difference is that a case-crossover study only includes cases, where each serves as his own referent. This feature has a compelling methodological appeal in that it allows for efficient control of potential confounders that are fixed (for example, genetic traits) or change minimally or slowly over time (for example, socioeconomic status), and are difficult or impractical to measure. Who better to provide control for confounding than the case himself? To date, the case-crossover design has been applied most often to investigate environmental exposure effects in studies of air pollution, as an alternative to time series analyses. The paper by Schwartz2 in this issue exemplifies this application, and also illustrates the utility of the case-crossover method for controlling for seasonal and long term air pollution time trends. There have also been several applications to …

[1]  M Hagberg,et al.  Perceived muscular tension, job strain, physical exposure, and associations with neck pain among VDU users; a prospective cohort study , 2004, Occupational and Environmental Medicine.

[2]  M. Maclure The case-crossover design: a method for studying transient effects on the risk of acute events. , 1991, American journal of epidemiology.

[3]  E A Eisen,et al.  Methodology for analyzing episodic events. , 1999, Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health.

[4]  G. Oster,et al.  Clinical characteristics and economic costs of patients with painful neuropathic disorders. , 2004, The journal of pain : official journal of the American Pain Society.

[5]  T K Courtney,et al.  Advancing epidemiologic studies of occupational injury--approaches and future directions. , 1997, American journal of industrial medicine.

[6]  A Cheadle,et al.  Factors influencing the duration of work-related disability: a population-based study of Washington State workers' compensation. , 1994, American journal of public health.

[7]  Alison M Trinkoff,et al.  Musculoskeletal problems of the neck, shoulder, and back and functional consequences in nurses. , 2002, American journal of industrial medicine.

[8]  L Punnett,et al.  Covariation between workplace physical and psychosocial stressors: evidence and implications for occupational health research and prevention , 2001, Ergonomics.

[9]  E. Eisen,et al.  A case-crossover study of transient risk factors for occupational acute hand injury , 2004, Occupational and Environmental Medicine.

[10]  E. Skargren,et al.  Prognostic factors for perceived pain and function at one-year follow-up in primary care patients with neck pain , 2002, Disability and rehabilitation.

[11]  L. Persson,et al.  Pain, coping, emotional state and physical function in patients with chronic radicular neck pain. A comparison between patients treated with surgery, physiotherapy or neck collar--a blinded, prospective randomized study. , 2001, Disability and rehabilitation.

[12]  J Schwartz,et al.  The effects of particulate air pollution on daily deaths: a multi-city case crossover analysis , 2004, Occupational and Environmental Medicine.

[13]  A. Burdorf,et al.  Prognostic factors for musculoskeletal sickness absence and return to work among welders and metal workers. , 1998, Occupational and environmental medicine.

[14]  William Navidi,et al.  Risk Set Sampling for Case-Crossover Designs , 2002, Epidemiology.