GlycoTorch Vina: Improved Docking of Sulfated Sugars Using QM-derived Scoring Functions

Glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) are a family of anionic carbohydrates that play an essential role in the physiology and pathology of all eukaryotic life. Experimental determination of GAG-protein complexes remains difficult due to the considerable diversity in both carbohydrate linkage, and sulfation patterns. To complement existing methods of structural determination, we present our molecular docking tool, GlycoTorchVina (GTV), which demonstrates a substantial improvement at reproducing low energy conformations of GAGs compared with traditional docking programs. Based on the carbohydrate specific docking program VinaCarb (VC), GTV utilizes rotational energy functions, calculated using density functional theory (DFT), specifically designed for glycosidic linkages found in GAGs. The redocking accuracy of four programs (GTV, VC, AutoDock Vina and Glide) was tested over a set of 10 high-quality crystal structures containing co-crystallized GAGs (tetrasaccharides or longer). GTV outperformed other programs and was able to reproduce the native pose of eight structures and produced top-scoring docked poses that were on average only 1.8 Å RMSD away from the crystal structure. Although imitation of crystal structures is a standard test used for assessing the accuracy of docking programs, we illustrate how the underlying quality of the crystal structure, which is often overlooked during benchmarking, affects conclusions drawn from this approach. Statistical and theoretical investigations into charge-charge (“salt-bridge”) interactions are also presented. Again, DFT calculations were used to derive non-bonded potentials describing salt-bridges, and solvent-mediated charge-charge (“water-bridge”) interactions. These data suggest that water-bridges play an important, yet poorly understood, role in the structures of GAG-protein complexes.

[1]  Horacio Emilio Pérez Sánchez,et al.  Current Status of Carbohydrates Information in the Protein Data Bank , 2020, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[2]  R. Bryce,et al.  Ring Puckering Landscapes of Glycosaminoglycan-Related Monosaccharides from Molecular Dynamics Simulations , 2019, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[3]  Isaure Chauvot de Beauchêne,et al.  Modeling large protein–glycosaminoglycan complexes using a fragment‐based approach , 2019, J. Comput. Chem..

[4]  Frédérique Lisacek,et al.  A pipeline to translate glycosaminoglycan sequences into 3D models. Application to the exploration of glycosaminoglycan conformational space , 2018, Glycobiology.

[5]  Rafał Kurczab,et al.  Salt Bridge in Ligand-Protein Complexes - Systematic Theoretical and Statistical Investigations , 2018, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[6]  P. Monagle,et al.  Heparin mimetics with anticoagulant activity , 2018, Medicinal research reviews.

[7]  A. Mark,et al.  Morphology of a Bulk Heterojunction Photovoltaic Cell with Low Donor Concentration. , 2018, ACS applied materials & interfaces.

[8]  Robert J Woods,et al.  Predicting the Structures of Glycans, Glycoproteins, and Their Complexes. , 2018, Chemical reviews.

[9]  Girish,et al.  Retraction for Ganesh et al., Structure of vaccinia complement protein in complex with heparin and potential implications for complement regulation , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[10]  W. Goddard,et al.  Predicting glycosaminoglycan surface protein interactions and implications for studying axonal growth , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[11]  R. Reis,et al.  Sulfation of Glycosaminoglycans and Its Implications in Human Health and Disorders. , 2017, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[12]  Alexander D. MacKerell,et al.  Estimating glycosaminoglycan-protein interaction affinity: water dominates the specific antithrombin-heparin interaction. , 2016, Glycobiology.

[13]  M. Pisabarro,et al.  Computational analysis of interactions in structurally available protein-glycosaminoglycan complexes. , 2016, Glycobiology.

[14]  R. Woods,et al.  Vina-Carb: Improving Glycosidic Angles during Carbohydrate Docking. , 2016, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[15]  P. Dobesh,et al.  Guidance for the practical management of the heparin anticoagulants in the treatment of venous thromboembolism , 2016, Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis.

[16]  Michael Schroeder,et al.  PLIP: fully automated protein–ligand interaction profiler , 2015, Nucleic Acids Res..

[17]  Bernhard Rupp,et al.  Models of protein–ligand crystal structures: trust, but verify , 2015, Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design.

[18]  Bethany Lachele Foley,et al.  BFMP: A Method for Discretizing and Visualizing Pyranose Conformations , 2014, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[19]  Bethany Lachele Foley,et al.  Importance of ligand conformational energies in carbohydrate docking: Sorting the wheat from the chaff , 2014, J. Comput. Chem..

[20]  V. Hlady,et al.  Sugar glues for broken neurons , 2013, Biomolecular concepts.

[21]  Marcus D. Hanwell,et al.  Avogadro: an advanced semantic chemical editor, visualization, and analysis platform , 2012, Journal of Cheminformatics.

[22]  Tjelvar S. G. Olsson,et al.  The good, the bad and the twisted: a survey of ligand geometry in protein crystal structures , 2012, Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design.

[23]  Jakub Kaminský,et al.  Accurate Conformational Energy Differences of Carbohydrates: A Complete Basis Set Extrapolation. , 2011, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[24]  Alessandro Pandini,et al.  Predicting the accuracy of protein–ligand docking on homology models , 2011, J. Comput. Chem..

[25]  M. Hong,et al.  Protonation, tautomerization, and rotameric structure of histidine: a comprehensive study by magic-angle-spinning solid-state NMR. , 2011, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[26]  Neha S Gandhi,et al.  Can current force fields reproduce ring puckering in 2-O-sulfo-alpha-L-iduronic acid? A molecular dynamics simulation study. , 2010, Carbohydrate research.

[27]  Arthur J. Olson,et al.  AutoDock Vina: Improving the speed and accuracy of docking with a new scoring function, efficient optimization, and multithreading , 2009, J. Comput. Chem..

[28]  Brendan Borrell,et al.  Fraud rocks protein community , 2009, Nature.

[29]  C. Cramer,et al.  Universal solvation model based on solute electron density and on a continuum model of the solvent defined by the bulk dielectric constant and atomic surface tensions. , 2009, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[30]  G. P. Johnson,et al.  Evaluation of Density Functionals and Basis Sets for Carbohydrates. , 2009, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[31]  Wei Li,et al.  The Heparin Binding Site of Protein C Inhibitor Is Protease-dependent* , 2008, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[32]  Neha S. Gandhi,et al.  The Structure of Glycosaminoglycans and their Interactions with Proteins , 2008, Chemical biology & drug design.

[33]  Dirk Neumann,et al.  BALLDock/SLICK: A New Method for Protein-Carbohydrate Docking , 2008, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[34]  D. Truhlar,et al.  The M06 suite of density functionals for main group thermochemistry, thermochemical kinetics, noncovalent interactions, excited states, and transition elements: two new functionals and systematic testing of four M06-class functionals and 12 other functionals , 2008 .

[35]  Stephen R Comeau,et al.  ClusPro: Performance in CAPRI rounds 6–11 and the new server , 2007, Proteins.

[36]  I. Campbell,et al.  Structures of the Cd44–hyaluronan complex provide insight into a fundamental carbohydrate-protein interaction , 2007, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[37]  M. Pardue,et al.  The Journal of Cell Biology , 2002 .

[38]  Nagarajan Vaidehi,et al.  Sulfation patterns of glycosaminoglycans encode molecular recognition and activity , 2006, Nature chemical biology.

[39]  Michael G. Lerner,et al.  Binding MOAD (Mother Of All Databases) , 2005, Proteins.

[40]  J. Angulo,et al.  Conformational flexibility of a synthetic glycosylaminoglycan bound to a fibroblast growth factor. FGF-1 recognizes both the (1)C(4) and (2)S(O) conformations of a bioactive heparin-like hexasaccharide. , 2005, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[41]  C. V. van Boeckel,et al.  A synthetic antithrombin III binding pentasaccharide is now a drug! What comes next? , 2004, Angewandte Chemie.

[42]  K. Murthy,et al.  Structure of vaccinia complement protein in complex with heparin and potential implications for complement regulation , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[43]  Hege S. Beard,et al.  Glide: a new approach for rapid, accurate docking and scoring. 2. Enrichment factors in database screening. , 2004, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[44]  Matthew P. Repasky,et al.  Glide: a new approach for rapid, accurate docking and scoring. 1. Method and assessment of docking accuracy. , 2004, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[45]  K. Kimata,et al.  Sulfation pattern in glycosaminoglycan: Does it have a code? , 2004, Glycoconjugate Journal.

[46]  N. Lebrasseur Heparin sustains the brain , 2003, The Journal of Cell Biology.

[47]  J. Turnbull,et al.  Heparan sulfate regulates amyloid precursor protein processing by BACE1, the Alzheimer's β-secretase , 2003, The Journal of cell biology.

[48]  J. Huntington,et al.  Crystal structure of antithrombin in a heparin-bound intermediate state. , 2003, Biochemistry.

[49]  Zachary Shriver,et al.  Roles of heparan-sulphate glycosaminoglycans in cancer , 2002, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[50]  Ruth Nussinov,et al.  Principles of docking: An overview of search algorithms and a guide to scoring functions , 2002, Proteins.

[51]  S. Opal,et al.  Antithrombin, heparin, and heparan sulfate , 2002, Critical care medicine.

[52]  J. Herbert,et al.  Synthesis of Conformationally Locked L-Iduronic Acid Derivatives. Direct Evidence for a Critical Role of the Skew-Boat 2S0 Conformer in the Activation of Antithrombin by Heparin. , 2002 .

[53]  R. Linhardt,et al.  Heparin-protein interactions. , 2002, Angewandte Chemie.

[54]  J. Herbert,et al.  Synthesis of conformationally locked L-iduronic acid derivatives: direct evidence for a critical role of the skew-boat 2S0 conformer in the activation of antithrombin by heparin. , 2001, Chemistry.

[55]  Songlin Li,et al.  Hyaluronan Binding and Degradation byStreptococcus agalactiae Hyaluronate Lyase* , 2001, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[56]  I. Vlodavsky,et al.  Molecular properties and involvement of heparanase in cancer metastasis and angiogenesis. , 2001, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[57]  G. Torri,et al.  Evidence for Conformational Equilibrium of the Sulfated L-Iduronate Residue in Heparin and in Synthetic Heparin Mono- and Oligosaccharides: NMR and Force-Field Studies. , 1987 .

[58]  T. Peters,et al.  Conformational analysis of synthetic heparin-like oligosaccharides containing α-L-idopyranosyluronic acid† , 1987 .

[59]  Benito Casu,et al.  Evidence for conformational equilibrium of the sulfated L-iduronate residue in heparin and in synthetic heparin mono- and oligo-saccharides: NMR and force-field studies , 1986 .

[60]  F. Weinhold,et al.  Natural population analysis , 1985 .

[61]  D. Freedman,et al.  On the histogram as a density estimator:L2 theory , 1981 .

[62]  D. Cremer,et al.  General definition of ring puckering coordinates , 1975 .