Performance evaluation of direct borohydride–hydrogen peroxide fuel cells with electrocatalysts supported on multiwalled carbon nanotubes

The performance of direct borohydride–hydrogen peroxide fuel cells with electrocatalysts supported on multiwalled carbon nanotubes is evaluated under various conditions. Electrocatalysts are reduced on multiwalled carbon nanotubes by NaH2PO2 and electrodes are investigated using scanning electron microscopy, energy dispersive spectroscopy, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, X-ray diffraction, and fuel cell testing. The maximum power density decreases with increasing NaBH4 concentration, likely owing to increases in NaBH4 decomposition and crossover rates and to production of increasing amounts of NaBO2. In contrast, the maximum power density increases with increasing H2O2 concentration, likely owing to increases in reactant concentrations. Moreover, increased operating temperatures improve decomposition and electrochemical reaction rates. A thin membrane increases fuel crossover, whereas a thick membrane decreases the maximum power density; consequently, the Nafion 212 membrane is the optimal thickness for use in fuel cells such as those studied here. Under selected conditions, the maximum power density is 101.9 mW/cm2. As operation time increases, fuel cell performance is degraded by oxidation and Na deposition.

[1]  Detlef Stolten,et al.  Energy storage characterization for a direct methanol fuel cell hybrid system , 2011 .

[2]  Sungyong An,et al.  Chugging Instability of H2O2 Monopropellant Thrusters with Catalyst Reactivity and Support Sizes , 2011 .

[3]  C. Hochenauer,et al.  Water droplet accumulation and motion in PEM (Proton Exchange Membrane) fuel cell mini-channels , 2012 .

[4]  A. K. Shukla,et al.  An alkaline direct borohydride fuel cell with hydrogen peroxide as oxidant , 2005 .

[5]  Frank Holcomb,et al.  Hydrogen-Peroxide-Based Fuel Cells for Space Power Systems , 2008 .

[6]  Manfred Wittig,et al.  The hydrogen value chain: applying the automotive role model of the hydrogen economy in the aerospace sector to increase performance and reduce costs , 2013 .

[7]  Rodney L. Burton,et al.  NaBH4/H2O2 fuel cells for air independent power systems , 2008 .

[8]  Jonghee Han,et al.  A structured Co–B catalyst for hydrogen extraction from NaBH4 solution , 2007 .

[9]  Sejin Kwon,et al.  Effect of heat treatment of electrodes on direct borohydride-hydrogen peroxide fuel cell performance , 2014 .

[10]  Guiling Wang,et al.  An alkaline direct NaBH4–H2O2 fuel cell with high power density , 2009 .

[11]  A. K. Shukla,et al.  A High Output Voltage Direct Borohydride Fuel Cell , 2004 .

[12]  A. Shukla,et al.  Electro-reduction of hydrogen peroxide on iron tetramethoxy phenyl porphyrin and lead sulfate electrodes with application in direct borohydride fuel cells , 2005 .

[13]  Benan Hu,et al.  Studies of electrochemical performance of carbon supported Pt–Cu nanoparticles as anode catalysts for direct borohydride–hydrogen peroxide fuel cell , 2011 .

[14]  S. Pitchumani,et al.  A direct borohydride fuel cell employing Prussian Blue as mediated electron-transfer hydrogen peroxide reduction catalyst , 2008 .

[15]  Sejin Kwon,et al.  Electrocatalysts supported on multiwalled carbon nanotubes for direct borohydride–hydrogen peroxide fuel cell , 2014 .

[16]  F. Walsh,et al.  A direct borohydride–peroxide fuel cell using a Pd/Ir alloy coated microfibrous carbon cathode , 2008 .

[17]  Frank Holcomb,et al.  Engineering of the bipolar stack of a direct NaBH4 fuel cell , 2008 .

[18]  Jianguo Liu,et al.  Direct NaBH4–H2O2 fuel cell based on nanoporous gold leaves , 2013 .

[19]  Ay Su,et al.  Development and testing of a hybrid system with a sub-kW open-cathode type PEM (proton exchange membrane) fuel cell stack , 2014 .

[20]  Hong Wang,et al.  Performance of supported Au-Co alloy as the anode catalyst of direct borohydride-hydrogen peroxide fuel cell , 2010 .

[21]  Hui‐Ming Cheng,et al.  Amorphous cobalt-boron/nickel foam as an effective catalyst for hydrogen generation from alkaline sodium borohydride solution , 2008 .

[22]  C. Ponce de León,et al.  A direct borohydride—Acid peroxide fuel cell , 2007 .

[23]  L. Zhixiang,et al.  Influence of operation conditions on direct NaBH4/H2O2 fuel cell performance , 2010 .

[24]  B. Liu,et al.  Solid sodium borohydride as a hydrogen source for fuel cells , 2009 .

[25]  R. Buchheit,et al.  Performance Study of Direct Borohydride Fuel Cells Employing Polyvinyl Alcohol Hydrogel Membrane and Nickel‐Based Anode , 2011 .

[26]  Xiaowei Liu,et al.  Investigation of a small-volume direct methanol fuel cell stack for portable applications , 2013 .

[27]  César A.C. Sequeira,et al.  Direct borohydride/peroxide fuel cells using Prussian Blue cathodes , 2012 .

[28]  Taegyu Kim,et al.  NaBH4 (sodium borohydride) hydrogen generator with a volume-exchange fuel tank for small unmanned aerial vehicles powered by a PEM (proton exchange membrane) fuel cell , 2014 .

[29]  Sejin Kwon,et al.  Performance evaluation of hydrogen generation system with electroless-deposited Co–P/Ni foam catalyst for NaBH4 hydrolysis , 2013 .

[30]  R. Buchheit,et al.  Direct borohydride fuel cell using Ni-based composite anodes , 2010 .

[31]  Hong Wang,et al.  Investigation of carbon supported Au–Ni bimetallic nanoparticles as electrocatalyst for direct borohydride fuel cell , 2011 .

[32]  Frano Barbir,et al.  Efficiency and weight trade-off analysis of regenerative fuel cells as energy storage for aerospace applications , 2005 .

[33]  Sejin Kwon,et al.  Design and development of a fuel cell-powered small unmanned aircraft , 2012 .

[34]  David L. Carroll,et al.  Direct NaBH4/H2O2 fuel cells , 2007 .

[35]  Yunfeng Song,et al.  High activity of Au–Cu/C electrocatalyst as anodic catalyst for direct borohydride-hydrogen peroxide fuel cell , 2011 .

[36]  Sridhar Parthasarathi,et al.  A Self-Supported Direct Borohydride-Hydrogen Peroxide Fuel Cell System , 2009 .

[37]  Xingyan Wang,et al.  Carbon-supported Pt–Co nanoparticles as anode catalyst for direct borohydride-hydrogen peroxide fuel cell: Electrocatalysis and fuel cell performance , 2012 .

[38]  A. Shukla,et al.  A Direct Borohydride/Hydrogen Peroxide Fuel Cell with Reduced Alkali Crossover , 2007 .

[39]  Sejin Kwon,et al.  Effect of manufacturing conditions on properties of electroless deposited Co–P/Ni foam catalyst for hydrolysis of sodium borohydride solution , 2012 .

[40]  Sejin Kwon,et al.  Fuel cell system with sodium borohydride as hydrogen source for unmanned aerial vehicles , 2011 .

[41]  Grant M. Kopec,et al.  Water Management Issues for Direct Borohydride/Peroxide Fuel Cells , 2010 .

[42]  Yunfeng Song,et al.  Carbon supported palladium hollow nanospheres as anode catalysts for direct borohydride-hydrogen peroxide fuel cells , 2012 .

[43]  Ying Wang,et al.  Carbon-Supported Au Hollow Nanospheres as Anode Catalysts for Direct Borohydride−Hydrogen Peroxide Fuel Cells , 2009 .

[44]  In-Su Han,et al.  PEM fuel-cell stack design for improved fuel utilization , 2013 .

[45]  George H. Miley,et al.  Cathode electrocatalyst selection and deposition for a direct borohydride/hydrogen peroxide fuel cell , 2007 .

[46]  Guiling Wang,et al.  A direct NaBH4-H2O2 fuel cell using Ni foam supported Au nanoparticles as electrodes , 2010 .

[47]  A. Shukla,et al.  A 28-W portable direct borohydride–hydrogen peroxide fuel-cell stack , 2006 .

[48]  Hong Wang,et al.  Carbon supported Pt hollow nanospheres as anode catalysts for direct borohydride-hydrogen peroxide f , 2011 .

[49]  K. Scott,et al.  Influence of operation conditions on direct borohydride fuel cell performance , 2006 .

[50]  Sungyong An,et al.  Chugging Instability of H2O2 Monopropellant Thrusters with Reactor Aspect Ratio and Pressures , 2011 .

[51]  Xianyou Wang,et al.  Carbon supported Pt–Sn nanoparticles as anode catalyst for direct borohydride–hydrogen peroxide fuel cell: Electrocatalysis and fuel cell performance , 2013 .