A number of recent articles in the literature have argued the case, when lead time is variable, for splitting a replenishment order for Q between n suppliers by comparing this with the alternative of placing a single order for Q on one supplier. The split order compares favourably on the grounds that the arrival of the first component of a split order cannot be later than the arrival of an order from any one specified supplier. This note argues that an alternative comparison could be made with a policy of ordering Q/n from a single supplier (n times as often). It makes this comparison in the context of a continuous review (Q, r) inventory model but does so not by comparing aggregate costs but by fixing Q and the customer stock service level and comparing the average stock — an approach which is more appropriate to how many companies manage inventory in practice. We consider Poisson and deterministic demand processes, a general lead time distribution and both lost sales and backorder models.
[1]
E. Silver,et al.
Safety stock reduction by order splitting
,
1990
.
[2]
Arthur F. Veinott,et al.
Analysis of Inventory Systems
,
1963
.
[3]
S. Y. Wu,et al.
Stock Control with Two Suppliers and Normal Lead Times
,
1981
.
[4]
J. Keith Ord,et al.
Multiple sourcing: The determination of lead times
,
1991,
Oper. Res. Lett..
[5]
Ranga V. Ramasesh,et al.
Note: Dual sourcing with nonidentical suppliers
,
1993
.
[6]
Ranga V. Ramasesh,et al.
Sole Versus Dual Sourcing in Stochastic Lead-Time s, Q Inventory Models
,
1991
.
[7]
D. Beyer.
An inventory model with wiener demand process and positive lead time
,
1994
.
[8]
D. Sculli,et al.
Analysis of a Continuous Review Stock-control Model with Multiple Suppliers
,
1990
.
[9]
Duncan K. H. Fong.
A Note on Exact Moment Computation for Normal Lead Times in the Two-Supplier Case
,
1992
.