Cryogenic irradiation of an EMCCD for the WFIRST coronagraph: preliminary performance analysis

The Wide Field Infra-Red Survey Telescope (WFIRST) is a NASA observatory scheduled to launch in the next decade that will settle essential questions in exoplanet science. The Wide Field Instrument (WFI) offers Hubble quality imaging over a 0.28 square degree field of view and will gather NIR statistical data on exoplanets through gravitational microlensing. An on-board coronagraph will for the first time perform direct imaging and spectroscopic analysis of exoplanets with properties analogous to those within our own solar system, including cold Jupiters, mini Neptunes and potentially super Earths. The Coronagraph Instrument (CGI) will be required to operate with low signal flux for long integration times, demanding all noise sources are kept to a minimum. The Electron Multiplication (EM)-CCD has been baselined for both the imaging and spectrograph cameras due its ability to operate with sub-electron effective read noise values with appropriate multiplication gain setting. The presence of other noise sources, however, such as thermal dark signal and Clock Induced Charge (CIC), need to be characterized and mitigated. In addition, operation within a space environment will subject the device to radiation damage that will degrade the Charge Transfer Effciency (CTE) of the device throughout the mission lifetime. Irradiation at the nominal instrument operating temperature has the potential to provide the best estimate of performance degradation that will be experienced in-flight, since the final population of silicon defects has been shown to be dependent upon the temperature at which the sensor is irradiated. Here we present initial findings from pre- and post- cryogenic irradiation testing of the e2v CCD201-20 BI EMCCD sensor, baselined for the WFIRST coronagraph instrument. The motivation for irradiation at cryogenic temperatures is discussed with reference to previous investigations of a similar nature. The results are presented in context with those from a previous room temperature irradiation investigation that was performed on a CCD201-20 operated under the same conditions. A key conclusion is that the measured performance degradation for a given proton fluence is seen to measurably differ for the cryogenic case compared to the room temperature equivalent for the conditions of this study.

[1]  P. Marshall,et al.  Proton effects in charge-coupled devices , 1996 .

[2]  David H. Lumb,et al.  Proton damage effects in EEV charge-coupled devices , 1990, Optics & Photonics.

[3]  H. E. Boesch,et al.  An overview of radiation-induced interface traps in MOS structures , 1989 .

[4]  David Hall,et al.  Mitigating radiation-induced charge transfer inefficiency in full-frame CCD applications by 'pumping' traps , 2012, Other Conferences.

[5]  David Hall,et al.  Technology advancement of the CCD201-20 EMCCD for the WFIRST coronagraph instrument: sensor characterization and radiation damage , 2015, 1601.01761.

[6]  C. Mackay,et al.  Photon counting strategies with low-light-level CCDs , 2003, astro-ph/0307305.

[7]  Olivier Guyon,et al.  Coronagraph instrument for WFIRST-AFTA , 2016 .

[8]  Andrew D. Holland,et al.  Proton irradiation of a swept charge device at cryogenic temperature and the subsequent annealing , 2015 .

[9]  Andrew Holland,et al.  Modelling radiation damage to ESA's Gaia satellite CCDs , 2008, Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[10]  Andrew D. Holland,et al.  Determination of In Situ Trap Properties in CCDs Using a “Single-Trap Pumping” Technique , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[11]  G. D. Watkins.  Intrinsic defects in silicon , 2000 .

[12]  Marsha J. Berger,et al.  ESTAR, PSTAR, ASTAR: A PC package for calculating stopping powers and ranges of electrons, protons and helium ions, version 2 , 1993 .

[13]  Olivier Daigle,et al.  CCCP: a CCD controller for counting photons , 2008, Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[14]  B. Hadwen,et al.  The noise performance of electron multiplying charge-coupled devices , 2003 .

[15]  David Hall,et al.  Studying defects in the silicon lattice using CCDs , 2014 .

[16]  Andrew Holland,et al.  The impact of radiation damage on photon counting with an EMCCD for the WFIRST-AFTA coronagraph , 2015, SPIE Optical Engineering + Applications.

[17]  Michael Moll,et al.  Radiation damage in silicon particle detectors: Microscopic defects and macroscopic properties , 1999 .

[18]  Ray Bell,et al.  The LLCCD: low-light imaging without the need for an intensifier , 2001, IS&T/SPIE Electronic Imaging.

[19]  Robert A. Reed,et al.  Hot pixel behavior in WFC3 CCD detectors irradiated under operational conditions , 2004, SPIE Optics + Photonics.

[20]  Victor A.J. Van Lint,et al.  The physics of radiation damage in particle detectors , 1987 .

[21]  J. R. Srour,et al.  Review of displacement damage effects in silicon devices , 2003 .

[22]  Giuseppe Sarri,et al.  Effects of Low Temperature Proton Irradiation on a Large Area CCD for Astrometric Applications , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[23]  B. LaMarr,et al.  Anomalous annealing of a high-resistivity CCD irradiated at low temperature , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[24]  David Hall,et al.  The relationship between pumped traps and signal loss in buried channel CCDs , 2013, Optics & Photonics - Optical Engineering + Applications.

[25]  Edward J. Wollack,et al.  Wide-Field InfrarRed Survey Telescope-Astrophysics Focused Telescope Assets WFIRST-AFTA 2015 Report , 2015, 1503.03757.

[26]  Edward A. Burke,et al.  Energy Dependence of Proton-Induced Displacement Damage in Silicon , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[27]  M. Cropper,et al.  Assessment of space proton radiation-induced charge transfer inefficiency in the CCD204 for the Euclid space observatory , 2012 .