Network modularity reveals critical scales for connectivity in ecology and evolution

For nearly a century, biologists have emphasized the profound importance of spatial scale for ecology, evolution and conservation. Nonetheless, objectively identifying critical scales has proven incredibly challenging. Here we extend new techniques from physics and social sciences that estimate modularity on networks to identify critical scales for movement and gene flow in animals. Using four species that vary widely in dispersal ability and include both mark-recapture and population genetic data, we identify significant modularity in three species, two of which cannot be explained by geographic distance alone. Importantly, the inclusion of modularity in connectivity and population viability assessments alters conclusions regarding patch importance to connectivity and suggests higher metapopulation viability than when ignoring this hidden spatial scale. We argue that network modularity reveals critical meso-scales that are probably common in populations, providing a powerful means of identifying fundamental scales for biology and for conservation strategies aimed at recovering imperilled species.

[1]  Dean L Urban,et al.  A Graph‐Theory Framework for Evaluating Landscape Connectivity and Conservation Planning , 2008, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[2]  A. Vespignani,et al.  The architecture of complex weighted networks. , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[3]  Massimo Marchiori,et al.  Error and attacktolerance of complex network s , 2004 .

[4]  W. Kitchens,et al.  Factors influencing movement probabilities of a nomadic food specialist: proximate foraging benefits or ultimate gains from exploration? , 2000 .

[5]  J. Nason,et al.  Population Graphs: the graph theoretic shape of genetic structure , 2004, Molecular ecology.

[6]  F. Allendorf,et al.  Identification of management units using population genetic data. , 2007, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[7]  Jared M. Diamond,et al.  THE ISLAND DILEMMA: LESSONS OF MODERN BIOGEOGRAPHIC STUDIES FOR THE DESIGN OF NATURAL RESERVES , 1975 .

[8]  Arthur S. Lieberman,et al.  Landscape Ecology , 1994, Springer New York.

[9]  M. Kimura,et al.  The Stepping Stone Model of Population Structure and the Decrease of Genetic Correlation with Distance. , 1964, Genetics.

[10]  Richard James,et al.  Hypothesis testing in animal social networks. , 2011, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[11]  I. Hanski A Practical Model of Metapopulation Dynamics , 1994 .

[12]  H. Bradley Shaffer,et al.  Evolution and Conservation , 2013 .

[13]  Jordi Bascompte,et al.  Networks of spatial genetic variation across species , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[14]  Peter Kareiva,et al.  Spatial ecology : the role of space in population dynamics and interspecific interactions , 1998 .

[15]  Athanasios S. Kallimanis,et al.  Metapopulation Extinction Risk under Spatially Autocorrelated Disturbance , 2005 .

[16]  U. Alon,et al.  Extinctions in Heterogeneous Environments and the Evolution of Modularity , 2009, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[17]  Hugh P. Possingham,et al.  Metapopulation mean life time within complex networks , 2010 .

[18]  Viral B. Shah,et al.  Using circuit theory to model connectivity in ecology, evolution, and conservation. , 2008, Ecology.

[19]  Ernesto Estrada,et al.  Using network centrality measures to manage landscape connectivity. , 2008, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[20]  John A. Wiens,et al.  Finding habitat patches and directional connectivity , 2003 .

[21]  Paul Galpern,et al.  Grains of connectivity: analysis at multiple spatial scales in landscape genetics , 2012, Molecular ecology.

[22]  M E J Newman,et al.  Modularity and community structure in networks. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[23]  Miguel A. Fortuna,et al.  Assessing the robustness of networks of spatial genetic variation. , 2013, Ecology letters.

[24]  Jon Norberg,et al.  A Network Approach for Analyzing Spatially Structured Populations in Fragmented Landscape , 2007, Landscape Ecology.

[25]  J. Hopfield,et al.  From molecular to modular cell biology , 1999, Nature.

[26]  J. Bascompte,et al.  The modularity of pollination networks , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[27]  Jean-Loup Guillaume,et al.  Fast unfolding of communities in large networks , 2008, 0803.0476.

[28]  Peter D. Hoff,et al.  Bilinear Mixed-Effects Models for Dyadic Data , 2005 .

[29]  J. Wiens Spatial Scaling in Ecology , 1989 .

[30]  ROBERT M. MAY,et al.  Will a Large Complex System be Stable? , 1972, Nature.

[31]  Peter D. Hoff,et al.  Latent Space Approaches to Social Network Analysis , 2002 .

[32]  Hans Van Dyck,et al.  Landscape connectivity and animal behavior: functional grain as a key determinant for dispersal , 2007, Landscape Ecology.

[33]  P. Donnelly,et al.  Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. , 2000, Genetics.

[34]  Rose A Graves,et al.  Facultative use of seasonal pools by American bullfrogs (Rana catesbeiana) , 2009, Wetlands.

[35]  M. Acevedo,et al.  Social network models predict movement and connectivity in ecological landscapes , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[36]  S. Fortunato,et al.  Resolution limit in community detection , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[37]  P. Boag,et al.  Discordant temporal and geographic patterns in maternal lineages of eastern North American frogs, Rana catesbeiana (Ranidae) and Pseudacris crucifer (Hylidae). , 2004, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.

[38]  A. Raftery,et al.  Model‐based clustering for social networks , 2007 .

[39]  F. Burel,et al.  Connectivity measures: a review , 2008, Landscape Ecology.

[40]  Samuel A. Cushman,et al.  Separating the effects of habitat area, fragmentation and matrix resistance on genetic differentiation in complex landscapes , 2011, Landscape Ecology.

[41]  J. Wiens,et al.  SPATIAL ECOLOGY OF CACTUS BUGS: AREA CONSTRAINTS AND PATCH CONNECTIVITY , 2005 .

[42]  L. Fahrig,et al.  Determining the Spatial Scale of Species' Response to Habitat , 2004 .

[43]  Justin M. Calabrese,et al.  A comparison-shopper's guide to connectivity metrics , 2004 .

[44]  Frederick R. Adler,et al.  Persistence in patchy irregular landscapes , 1994 .

[45]  J. Nason,et al.  Landscape modelling of gene flow: improved power using conditional genetic distance derived from the topology of population networks , 2010, Molecular ecology.

[46]  P. Boag,et al.  Controlling for the Effects of History and Nonequilibrium Conditions in Gene Flow Estimates in Northern Bullfrog (Rana catesbeiana) Populations , 2004, Genetics.

[47]  M E J Newman,et al.  Community structure in social and biological networks , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[48]  David E. Hiebeler,et al.  Populations on fragmented landscapes with spatially structured heterogeneities : Landscape generation and local dispersal , 2000 .

[49]  Roger Guimerà,et al.  Cartography of complex networks: modules and universal roles , 2005, Journal of statistical mechanics.

[50]  Renaud Lambiotte,et al.  Uncovering space-independent communities in spatial networks , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[51]  S. Levin The problem of pattern and scale in ecology , 1992 .

[52]  Mark New,et al.  Ensemble forecasting of species distributions. , 2007, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[53]  James H. Brown,et al.  Turnover Rates in Insular Biogeography: Effect of Immigration on Extinction , 1977 .

[54]  I. Hanski,et al.  Eco-evolutionary spatial dynamics in the Glanville fritillary butterfly , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[55]  L. Fahrig Effects of Habitat Fragmentation on Biodiversity , 2003 .

[56]  D. Padilla,et al.  Ecological neighborhoods: scaling environmental patterns , 1987 .

[57]  John A. Wiens,et al.  Movements of cactus bugs: Patch transfers, matrix resistance, and edge permeability , 2004, Landscape Ecology.

[58]  Zhi Wang,et al.  Correction: In Search of the Biological Significance of Modular Structures in Protein Networks , 2007, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[59]  Otso Ovaskainen,et al.  The metapopulation capacity of a fragmented landscape , 2000, Nature.

[60]  M. Drechsler,et al.  Are spatially correlated or uncorrelated disturbance regimes better for the survival of species , 2003 .

[61]  J. Chave The problem of pattern and scale in ecology: what have we learned in 20 years? , 2013, Ecology letters.

[62]  Bruce T. Milne,et al.  Detecting Critical Scales in Fragmented Landscapes , 1997 .

[63]  R. Guimerà,et al.  Functional cartography of complex metabolic networks , 2005, Nature.

[64]  Benjamin H. Good,et al.  Performance of modularity maximization in practical contexts. , 2009, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[65]  Santo Fortunato,et al.  Community detection in graphs , 2009, ArXiv.

[66]  R. Macarthur The Problem of Pattern and Scale in Ecology: The Robert H. MacArthur Award Lecture , 2005 .

[67]  R. Guimerà,et al.  Modularity from fluctuations in random graphs and complex networks. , 2004, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[68]  J. Bascompte,et al.  Compartmentalization increases food-web persistence , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[69]  Robert C. Wolpert,et al.  A Review of the , 1985 .

[70]  T. Bailey Spatial Analysis: A Guide for Ecologists , 2006 .

[71]  K. McCann,et al.  Dynamics of Compartmented and Reticulate Food Webs in Relation to Energetic Flows , 2004, The American Naturalist.

[72]  S. Wright,et al.  Isolation by Distance. , 1943, Genetics.

[73]  Atte Moilanen,et al.  SIMPLE CONNECTIVITY MEASURES IN SPATIAL ECOLOGY , 2002 .

[74]  R. Holt A neglected facet of island biogeography: The role of internal spatial dynamics in area effects , 1992 .

[75]  Santiago Saura,et al.  A common currency for the different ways in which patches and links can contribute to habitat availability and connectivity in the landscape , 2010 .

[76]  R. Didham,et al.  Predicting the impacts of edge effects in fragmented habitats: Laurance and Yensen’s core area model revisited , 2012 .

[77]  Jordi Bascompte,et al.  Metapopulation models for extinction threshold in spatially correlated landscapes. , 2002, Journal of theoretical biology.

[78]  David Paetkau,et al.  Effectiveness of a Regional Corridor in Connecting Two Florida Black Bear Populations , 2006, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[79]  Jeff Bowman,et al.  Applications of graph theory to landscape genetics , 2008, Evolutionary applications.

[80]  J. Mccown,et al.  Genetic consequences of habitat fragmentation and loss: the case of the Florida black bear (Ursus americanus floridanus) , 2007, Conservation Genetics.

[81]  T. J. Walker,et al.  The Evolutionary Ecology of Animal Migration , 1978 .