The Role of Live Visuals in Audience Understanding of Electronic Music Performances

There is an identified lack of visual feedback in electronic music performances. Live visuals have been used to fill in this gap. However, there is a scarcity of studies that analyze the effectiveness of live visuals in conveying feedback. In this paper, we aim to study the contribution of live visuals to the understanding of electronic music performances, from the perspective of the audience. We present related work in the fields of audience studies in performing arts, electronic music and audiovisuals. For this purpose, we organized two live events, where 10 audiovisual performances took place. We used questionnaires to conduct an audience study in these events. Results point to a better audience understanding in two of the four design patterns we used as analytical framework. In our discussion, we suggest best practices for the design of audiovisual performance systems that can lead to improved audience understanding.

[1]  Josephine Machon.  Entangled: Technology and the Transformation of Performance , 2011 .

[2]  M. Gurevich,et al.  Digital Musical Interactions: Performer–system relationships and their perception by spectators , 2011, Organised Sound.

[3]  Veronica Teichrieb,et al.  Considering Audience's View Towards an Evaluation Methodology for Digital Musical Instruments , 2012, NIME.

[4]  W. Griswold,et al.  Readers as Audiences , 2011 .

[5]  Nick Collins,et al.  Live coding in laptop performance , 2003, Organised Sound.

[6]  Matthew Reason,et al.  ‘Asking the audience: audience research and the experience of theatre’ , 2010 .

[7]  S. Puig.  Digital lutherie - crafting musical computers for new musics' performance and improvisation , 2005 .

[8]  Jennifer Radbourne,et al.  Audience experience : measuring quality in the performing arts , 2009 .

[9]  William A. Evans,et al.  The Interpretive Turn in Media Research Innovation, Iteration, or Illusion? , 1990 .

[10]  Sidney Fels,et al.  Mapping transparency through metaphor: towards more expressive musical instruments , 2002, Organised Sound.

[11]  Álvaro Barbosa,et al.  Are Luminous Devices Helping Musicians to Produce Better Aural Results, or Just Helping Audiences Not To Get Bored? , 2013 .

[12]  Sriram Subramanian,et al.  Rouages: Revealing the Mechanisms of Digital Musical Instruments to the Audience , 2013, NIME.

[13]  Atau Tanaka,et al.  Prototyping audiovisual performance tools: a hackathon approach , 2015, NIME.

[14]  Atau Tanaka,et al.  AVUI: Designing a Toolkit for Audiovisual Interfaces , 2017, CHI.

[15]  B. Wheeler.  The Social Construction of an Art Field: How Audience Informed the Institutionalization of Performance Art , 2004 .

[16]  C. Spence,et al.  INTERACTION OF SIGHT AND SOUND IN THE PERCEPTION AND EXPERIENCE OF MUSICAL PERFORMANCE , 2016 .

[17]  Javier Jaimovich,et al.  The Emotion in Motion Experiment: Using an Interactive Installation as a Means for Understanding Emotional Response to Music , 2012, NIME.

[18]  Saul Albert.  Rhythmical coordination of performers and audience in partner dance. Delineating improvised and choreographed interaction , 2015 .

[19]  Willliam Moritz,et al.  Optical Poetry: The Life and Work of Oskar Fischinger , 2004 .

[20]  R. Day.  Remediation: Understanding new media , 1999 .

[21]  Friedrich Platz,et al.  When the Eye Listens: A Meta-analysis of How Audio-visual Presentation Enhances the Appreciation of Music Performance , 2012 .

[22]  G Moro,et al.  residUUm: user mapping and performance strategies for multilayered live audiovisual generation , 2016, NIME.

[23]  Nick Bryan-Kinns,et al.  Skip the Pre-Concert Demo: How Technical Familiarity and Musical Style Affect Audience Response , 2016, NIME.

[24]  Golan Levin.  Painterly interfaces for audiovisual performance , 2000 .

[25]  Till Bovermann,et al.  Audience Experience in Sound Performance , 2013, NIME.

[26]  Atau Tanaka,et al.  User-centered design of a tool for interactive computer-generated audiovisuals , 2014 .