An Asymptotic Theory for Estimating Beta‐Pricing Models Using Cross‐Sectional Regression

Without the assumption of conditional homoskedasticity, a general asymptotic distribution theory for the two-stage cross-sectional regression method shows that the standard errors produced by the Fama-MacBeth procedure do not necessarily overstate the precision of the risk premium estimates. When factors are misspecified, estimators for risk premiums can be biased, and the "t"-value of a premium may converge to infinity in probability even when the true premium is zero. However, when a beta-pricing model is misspecified, the "t"-values for firm characteristics generally converge to infinity in probability, which supports the use of firm characteristics in cross-sectional regressions for detecting model misspecification. Copyright The American Finance Association 1998.

[1]  S. P. Kothari,et al.  Another Look at the Cross-section of Expected Stock Returns , 1995 .

[2]  Ravi Jagannathan,et al.  Implications of Security Market Data for Models of Dynamic Economies , 1990, Journal of Political Economy.

[3]  S. Ross,et al.  Economic Forces and the Stock Market , 1986 .

[4]  R. Banz,et al.  The relationship between return and market value of common stocks , 1981 .

[5]  R. Jagannathan,et al.  A Note on the Asymptotic Covariance in Fama‐MacBeth Regression , 1998 .

[6]  Josef Lakonishok,et al.  Fundamentals and Stock Returns in Japan , 1991 .

[7]  J. Wooldridge,et al.  A Capital Asset Pricing Model with Time-Varying Covariances , 1988, Journal of Political Economy.

[8]  S. Ross The arbitrage theory of capital asset pricing , 1976 .

[9]  Raymond Kan,et al.  Two‐Pass Tests of Asset Pricing Models with Useless Factors , 1999 .

[10]  Jonathan E. Ingersoll,et al.  Mean-Variance Theory in Complete Markets , 1982 .

[11]  G. Schwert,et al.  Heteroskedasticity in Stock Returns , 1989 .

[12]  James L. Davis The Cross-Section of Realized Stock Returns: The Pre- Compustat Evidence , 1994 .

[13]  Kent D. Daniel,et al.  NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES EVIDENCE ON THE CHARACTERISTICS OF CROSS SECTIONAL VARIATION IN STOCK RETURNS , 1996 .

[14]  G. Barone-Adesi,et al.  Market Models and Heteroscedasticity of Residual Security Returns , 1983 .

[15]  E. Fama,et al.  Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds , 1993 .

[16]  E. Fama,et al.  The Cross‐Section of Expected Stock Returns , 1992 .

[17]  Ravi Jagannathan,et al.  Assessing Specification Errors in Stochastic Discount Factor Models , 1994 .

[18]  Jay Shanken On the Estimation of Beta-Pricing Models , 1992 .

[19]  W. Sharpe CAPITAL ASSET PRICES: A THEORY OF MARKET EQUILIBRIUM UNDER CONDITIONS OF RISK* , 1964 .

[20]  E. Fama,et al.  Risk, Return, and Equilibrium: Empirical Tests , 1973, Journal of Political Economy.

[21]  A. Craig MacKinlay,et al.  Using Generalized Method of Moments to Test Mean‐Variance Efficiency , 1991 .

[22]  Lars Peter Hansen,et al.  THE ROLE OF CONDITIONING INFORMATION IN DEDUCING TESTABLE RESTRICTIONS IMPLIED BY DYNAMIC ASSET PRICING MODELS1 , 1987 .

[23]  F. Black,et al.  The Capital Asset Pricing Model: Some Empirical Tests , 2006 .

[24]  E. Fama,et al.  Multifactor Explanations of Asset Pricing Anomalies , 1996 .

[25]  E. Fama The Behavior of Stock-Market Prices , 1965 .

[26]  Richard Roll,et al.  A Critique of the Asset Pricing Theory''s Tests: Part I , 1977 .

[27]  Robert C. Blattberg,et al.  A Comparison of the Stable and Student Distributions as Statistical Models for Stock Prices: Reply , 1974 .

[28]  Narasimhan Jegadeesh Does Market Risk Really Explain the Size Effect? , 1992, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis.

[29]  R. Jagannathan,et al.  The Conditional CAPM and the Cross-Section of Expected Returns , 1996 .

[30]  J. Berk A Critique of Size-Related Anomalies , 1995 .

[31]  James D. Hamilton Time Series Analysis , 1994 .

[32]  L. Hansen Large Sample Properties of Generalized Method of Moments Estimators , 1982 .

[33]  R. Stambaugh,et al.  Portfolio Inefficiency and the Cross-Section of Expected Returns , 1994 .