Partial unfolding and refolding for structure refinement: A unified approach of geometric simulations and molecular dynamics

The most successful protein structure prediction methods to date have been template‐based modeling (TBM) or homology modeling, which predicts protein structure based on experimental structures. These high accuracy predictions sometimes retain structural errors due to incorrect templates or a lack of accurate templates in the case of low sequence similarity, making these structures inadequate in drug‐design studies or molecular dynamics simulations. We have developed a new physics based approach to the protein refinement problem by mimicking the mechanism of chaperons that rehabilitate misfolded proteins. The template structure is unfolded by selectively (targeted) pulling on different portions of the protein using the geometric based technique FRODA, and then refolded using hierarchically restrained replica exchange molecular dynamics simulations (hr‐REMD). FRODA unfolding is used to create a diverse set of topologies for surveying near native‐like structures from a template and to provide a set of persistent contacts to be employed during re‐folding. We have tested our approach on 13 previous CASP targets and observed that this method of folding an ensemble of partially unfolded structures, through the hierarchical addition of contact restraints (that is, first local and then nonlocal interactions), leads to a refolding of the structure along with refinement in most cases (12/13). Although this approach yields refined models through advancement in sampling, the task of blind selection of the best refined models still needs to be solved. Overall, the method can be useful for improved sampling for low resolution models where certain of the portions of the structure are incorrectly modeled. Proteins 2015; 83:2279–2292. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

[1]  Y. Duan,et al.  Folding free-energy landscape of villin headpiece subdomain from molecular dynamics simulations , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[2]  K. Dill,et al.  The Protein-Folding Problem, 50 Years On , 2012, Science.

[3]  Kentaro Shimizu,et al.  Refinement of comparative models of protein structure by using multicanonical molecular dynamics simulations , 2008 .

[4]  C. Simmerling,et al.  Structural insights for designed alanine‐rich helices: Comparing NMR helicity measures and conformational ensembles from molecular dynamics simulation , 2008, Biopolymers.

[5]  Michael Rempel,et al.  What Works and What Does Not , 2002 .

[6]  Krzysztof Fidelis,et al.  CASP10 results compared to those of previous CASP experiments , 2014, Proteins.

[7]  D. Case,et al.  Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Nucleic Acids with a Generalized Born Solvation Model , 2000 .

[8]  David T Jones,et al.  Evaluation of predictions in the CASP10 model refinement category , 2013, Proteins.

[9]  Kyle A. Beauchamp,et al.  Molecular simulation of ab initio protein folding for a millisecond folder NTL9(1-39). , 2010, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[10]  Bosco K. Ho,et al.  Revisiting the Ramachandran plot: Hard‐sphere repulsion, electrostatics, and H‐bonding in the α‐helix , 2003, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[11]  Dominik Gront,et al.  BMC Structural Biology BioMed Central , 2007 .

[12]  D. Baker,et al.  Molecular dynamics in the endgame of protein structure prediction. , 2001, Journal of molecular biology.

[13]  D. Jacobs,et al.  Protein flexibility and dynamics using constraint theory. , 2001, Journal of molecular graphics & modelling.

[14]  Ken A Dill,et al.  A test on peptide stability of AMBER force fields with implicit solvation. , 2008, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[15]  S. Jang,et al.  Direct folding studies of various alpha and beta strands using replica exchange molecular dynamics simulation. , 2008, The Journal of chemical physics.

[16]  Jean-François Gibrat,et al.  Can molecular dynamics simulations help in discriminating correct from erroneous protein 3D models? , 2008, BMC Bioinformatics.

[17]  Martin Karplus,et al.  Gaussian-mixture umbrella sampling. , 2009, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[18]  V. Hornak,et al.  Modified replica exchange simulation methods for local structure refinement. , 2005, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[19]  Peter A. Kollman,et al.  AMBER, a package of computer programs for applying molecular mechanics, normal mode analysis, molecular dynamics and free energy calculations to simulate the structural and energetic properties of molecules , 1995 .

[20]  F. Rao,et al.  Replica exchange molecular dynamics simulations of reversible folding , 2003 .

[21]  W. Kabsch,et al.  Dictionary of protein secondary structure: Pattern recognition of hydrogen‐bonded and geometrical features , 1983, Biopolymers.

[22]  Vijay S Pande,et al.  Progress and challenges in the automated construction of Markov state models for full protein systems. , 2009, The Journal of chemical physics.

[23]  Christopher M. Summa,et al.  Solvent dramatically affects protein structure refinement , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[24]  Vijay S Pande,et al.  Convergence of folding free energy landscapes via application of enhanced sampling methods in a distributed computing environment. , 2008, The Journal of chemical physics.

[25]  Vincent A. Voelz,et al.  Blind test of physics-based prediction of protein structures. , 2009, Biophysical journal.

[26]  Vahid Mirjalili,et al.  Protein Structure Refinement through Structure Selection and Averaging from Molecular Dynamics Ensembles. , 2013, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[27]  Jianhan Chen,et al.  Can molecular dynamics simulations provide high‐resolution refinement of protein structure? , 2007, Proteins.

[28]  Jack Snoeyink,et al.  Nucleic Acids Research Advance Access published April 22, 2007 MolProbity: all-atom contacts and structure validation for proteins and nucleic acids , 2007 .

[29]  J. Hermans,et al.  Free energies of protein decoys provide insight into determinants of protein stability , 2001, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[30]  Vahid Mirjalili,et al.  Physics‐based protein structure refinement through multiple molecular dynamics trajectories and structure averaging , 2014, Proteins.

[31]  Oliver F. Lange,et al.  Structure prediction for CASP8 with all‐atom refinement using Rosetta , 2009, Proteins.

[32]  John Moult,et al.  A decade of CASP: progress, bottlenecks and prognosis in protein structure prediction. , 2005, Current opinion in structural biology.

[33]  Viktor Hornak,et al.  Improving Convergence of Replica-Exchange Simulations through Coupling to a High-Temperature Structure Reservoir. , 2007, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[34]  Hao Fan,et al.  Refinement of homology‐based protein structures by molecular dynamics simulation techniques , 2004, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[35]  Chaok Seok,et al.  GalaxyWEB server for protein structure prediction and refinement , 2012, Nucleic Acids Res..

[36]  Adam Zemla,et al.  LGA: a method for finding 3D similarities in protein structures , 2003, Nucleic Acids Res..

[37]  M. Karplus,et al.  Discrimination of the native from misfolded protein models with an energy function including implicit solvation. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.

[38]  Y. Sugita,et al.  Replica-exchange molecular dynamics method for protein folding , 1999 .

[39]  M Scott Shell,et al.  Convergence and Heterogeneity in Peptide Folding with Replica Exchange Molecular Dynamics. , 2009, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[40]  S. Jang,et al.  Consistent free energy landscapes and thermodynamic properties of small proteins based on a single all-atom force field employing an implicit solvation. , 2007, The Journal of chemical physics.

[41]  Lauren Wickstrom,et al.  Evaluating the performance of the ff99SB force field based on NMR scalar coupling data. , 2009, Biophysical journal.

[42]  Chun Wu,et al.  Folding processes of the B domain of protein A to the native state observed in all-atom ab initio folding simulations. , 2008, The Journal of chemical physics.

[43]  Vahid Mirjalili,et al.  Protein structure refinement via molecular‐dynamics simulations: What works and what does not? , 2016, Proteins.

[44]  R. Dror,et al.  How Fast-Folding Proteins Fold , 2011, Science.

[45]  Anna Tramontano,et al.  Critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction (CASP) — round x , 2014, Proteins.

[46]  Stefano Piana,et al.  Refinement of protein structure homology models via long, all‐atom molecular dynamics simulations , 2012, Proteins.

[47]  A. Roitberg,et al.  Coupling of replica exchange simulations to a non-Boltzmann structure reservoir. , 2007, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[48]  Ceslovas Venclovas,et al.  Assessment of progress over the CASP experiments , 2003, Proteins.

[49]  Philip M Williams,et al.  Protein unfolding under force: crack propagation in a network. , 2011, Biophysical journal.

[50]  K. Dill,et al.  Assessment of the protein‐structure refinement category in CASP8 , 2009, Proteins.

[51]  Christodoulos A Floudas,et al.  Princeton_TIGRESS: Protein geometry refinement using simulations and support vector machines , 2014, Proteins.

[52]  M R Lee,et al.  Free-energy calculations highlight differences in accuracy between X-ray and NMR structures and add value to protein structure prediction. , 2001, Structure.

[53]  G. Hummer,et al.  Optimized molecular dynamics force fields applied to the helix-coil transition of polypeptides. , 2009, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[54]  Leslie A Kuhn,et al.  Protein unfolding: Rigidity lost , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[55]  B. Rost,et al.  Critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction—Round VIII , 2009, Proteins.

[56]  Tyler J. Glembo,et al.  Union of geometric constraint-based simulations with molecular dynamics for protein structure prediction. , 2010, Biophysical journal.

[57]  Hongyi Zhou,et al.  Distance‐scaled, finite ideal‐gas reference state improves structure‐derived potentials of mean force for structure selection and stability prediction , 2002, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[58]  Charles L Brooks,et al.  Recent advances in implicit solvent-based methods for biomolecular simulations. , 2008, Current opinion in structural biology.

[59]  D. Jacobs,et al.  Protein flexibility predictions using graph theory , 2001, Proteins.

[60]  Lisa N Kinch,et al.  CASP5 assessment of fold recognition target predictions , 2003, Proteins.

[61]  K. Dill,et al.  Protein folding by zipping and assembly , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[62]  Daniel W. Farrell,et al.  Generating stereochemically acceptable protein pathways , 2010, Proteins.

[63]  a Mark A. Murcko,et al.  Carbon−Carbon Rotational Barriers in Butane, 1-Butene, and 1,3-Butadiene , 1996 .

[64]  A. Sali,et al.  Protein Structure Prediction and Structural Genomics , 2001, Science.