IMPEDANCE AND ADMITTANCE CONTROLLER FOR A MULTI-AXIS POWERED ANKLE-FOOT PROSTHESIS

This paper introduces a finite state machine to select between impedance and admittance control for a powered ankle-foot prosthesis controllable in both Dorsiflexion-Plantarflexion (DP) and Inversion-Eversion (IE). Strain gauges are installed on the prosthesis’ foot to measure the strain caused by ground reaction forces, which are correlated to the external torques in DP and IE. The external torques are used for the admittance and impedance controllers. Additionally, the finite state machine uses the strain gauges feedback to detect the heel-strike and switch to admittance control. The admittance control accepts torque feedback to generate motion, this way larger feedback torques effectively reduces the stiffness of the ankle. During push off, the finite state machine switches to impedance control, accepting motion feedback to generate the appropriated torques. The quasi-static stiffness of the prosthesis with impedance control was tested, showing a near linear relationship between the torque feedback gain and the stiffness of the ankle. The finite state machine and controllers were also evaluated using a custom-made circular treadmill and the results were compared to the results of position and passive controllers; showing that the impedance/admittance controller was capable of tracking the desired input trajectory while decreasing the required torque at the ankle joint.Copyright © 2014 by ASME

[1]  Greta C Bernatz,et al.  Video task analysis of turning during activities of daily living. , 2007, Gait & posture.

[2]  S. Naumann,et al.  ANALYSIS OF MECHANICAL AND METABOLIC FACTORS IN THE GAIT OF CONGENITAL BELOW KNEE AMPUTEES: A Comparison of the SACH and Seattle Feet , 1992, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[3]  Hermano Igo Krebs,et al.  Quantitative Characterization of Steady-State Ankle Impedance With Muscle Activation , 2010 .

[4]  Hermano Igo Krebs,et al.  Directional Variation of Active and Passive Ankle Static Impedance , 2009 .

[5]  Frank C. Sup,et al.  A powered self-contained knee and ankle prosthesis for near normal gait in transfemoral amputees. , 2009 .

[6]  Todd A Kuiken,et al.  Development of a mechatronic platform and validation of methods for estimating ankle stiffness during the stance phase of walking. , 2013, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[7]  Richard R Neptune,et al.  Compensatory mechanisms of transtibial amputees during circular turning. , 2011, Gait & posture.

[8]  Alena M. Grabowski,et al.  Bionic ankle–foot prosthesis normalizes walking gait for persons with leg amputation , 2012, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[9]  Hermano Igo Krebs,et al.  Stochastic Estimation of the Multi-Variable Mechanical Impedance of the Human Ankle With Active Muscles , 2010 .

[10]  Kevin Cleary,et al.  Closed-Loop Force Control for Haptic Simulation of Virtual Environments , 2000 .

[11]  Hermano Igo Krebs,et al.  Stochastic Estimation of Multi-Variable Human Ankle Mechanical Impedance , 2009 .

[12]  Hugh M. Herr,et al.  POWERED ANKLE-FOOT PROSTHESIS IMPROVES METABOLIC DEMAND OF UNILATERAL TRANSTIBIAL AMPUTEES DURING WALKING , 2010 .

[13]  J. Dingwell,et al.  Separating the effects of age and walking speed on gait variability. , 2008, Gait & posture.

[14]  Michael S Orendurff,et al.  Ground reaction forces and impulses during a transient turning maneuver. , 2008, Journal of biomechanics.

[15]  N. H. Molen Energy/speed relation of below-knee amputees walking on a motor-driven treadmill , 1973, Internationale Zeitschrift für angewandte Physiologie einschließlich Arbeitsphysiologie.

[16]  Michael Goldfarb,et al.  Design and Control of a Powered Transfemoral Prosthesis , 2008, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[17]  N. Hogan,et al.  Multivariable Static Ankle Mechanical Impedance With Active Muscles , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[18]  H.A. Varol,et al.  Preliminary Evaluations of a Self-Contained Anthropomorphic Transfemoral Prosthesis , 2009, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[19]  Neville Hogan,et al.  Impedance Control: An Approach to Manipulation: Part I—Theory , 1985 .