Accident investigation reporting deficiencies related to organizational factors in machinery space fires and explosions.

Careful accident investigation provides opportunities to review safety arrangements in socio-technical systems. There is consensus that human intervention is involved in the majority of accidents. Ever cautious of the consequences attributed to such a claim vis-à-vis the apportionment of blame, several authors have highlighted the importance of investigating organizational factors in this respect. Specific regulations to limit what were perceived as unsuitable organizational influences in shipping operations were adopted by the International Maritime Organization (IMO). Guidance is provided for the investigation of human and organizational factors involved in maritime accidents. This paper presents a review of 41 accident investigation reports related to machinery space fires and explosions. The objective was to find out if organizational factors are identified during maritime accident investigations. An adapted version of the Human Factor Analysis and Classification System (HFACS) with minor modifications related to machinery space features was used for this review. The results of the review show that organizational factors were not identified by maritime accident investigators to the extent expected had the IMO guidelines been observed. Instead, contributing factors at the lower end of organizational echelons are over-represented.

[1]  Sidney W A Dekker,et al.  Reconstructing human contributions to accidents: the new view on error and performance. , 2002, Journal of safety research.

[2]  Detlef Nielsen,et al.  Causes of casualties and the regulation of occupational health and safety in the shipping industry , 2005 .

[3]  Snorre Sklet,et al.  Comparison of some selected methods for accident investigation. , 2004, Journal of hazardous materials.

[4]  Scott A. Shappell,et al.  APPLYING REASON: THE HUMAN FACTORS ANALYSIS AND CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM (HFACS) , 2001 .

[5]  David P. Baker,et al.  Running Head: TAXONOMIES, REPORTING SYSTEMS, AND DATA COLLECTION TOOLS A Review of Selected Aviation Human Factors Taxonomies, Accident/Incident Reporting Systems, and Data Collection Tools , 2002 .

[6]  Yves Dien,et al.  Organisational accidents investigation methodology and lessons learned. , 2004, Journal of hazardous materials.

[7]  Deepak Gaur Human factors analysis and classification system applied to civil aircraft accidents in India. , 2005, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[8]  Erik Hollnagel,et al.  Barriers And Accident Prevention , 2004 .

[9]  Patricia A. LeDuc,et al.  The Role of Human Causal Factors in U.S. Army Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Accidents , 2004 .

[10]  Don Harris,et al.  Routes to failure: analysis of 41 civil aviation accidents from the Republic of China using the human factors analysis and classification system. , 2008, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[11]  Anthony P Tvaryanas,et al.  Human factors in remotely piloted aircraft operations: HFACS analysis of 221 mishaps over 10 years. , 2006, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[12]  David C Krulak,et al.  Human factors in maintenance: impact on aircraft mishap frequency and severity. , 2004, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[13]  Kazuo Furuta,et al.  The Rational Choice Of “Error” , 2000, Cognition, Technology & Work.

[14]  E. Hollnagel,et al.  What-You-Look-For-Is-What-You-Find - The consequences of underlying accident models in eight accident investigation manuals , 2009 .

[15]  Alex Viale,et al.  Application of a human error framework to conduct train accident/incident investigations. , 2006, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[16]  Erik Hollnagel,et al.  Cognitive reliability and error analysis method : CREAM , 1998 .

[17]  Scott A. Shappell,et al.  A HUMAN ERROR APPROACH TO AVIATION ACCIDENT ANALYSIS , 2003 .

[18]  Jacques Leplat,et al.  Event Analysis and Responsibility in Complex Systems , 1997 .

[19]  C J Parker HERALD OF FREE ENTERPRISE , 1987 .

[20]  Tjerk W. van der Schaaf,et al.  Near miss reporting in the chemical process industry: An overview , 1995 .

[21]  Joaquim Casal,et al.  Historical analysis of accidents in seaports , 2004 .

[22]  Chin-Shan Lu,et al.  The effects of safety climate on vessel accidents in the container shipping context. , 2008, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[23]  Jens U. Schröder-Hinrichs,et al.  Human and organizational factors in the maritime world — Are we keeping up to speed? , 2010 .

[24]  J. M. Patterson,et al.  Operator error and system deficiencies: analysis of 508 mining incidents and accidents from Queensland, Australia using HFACS. , 2010, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[25]  Paul O'Connor,et al.  HFACS with an additional layer of granularity: validity and utility in accident analysis. , 2008, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[26]  Steven T Shorrock,et al.  Evaluation of the HFACS-ADF safety classification system: inter-coder consensus and intra-coder consistency. , 2010, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[27]  Kathryn Mearns,et al.  Safety in shipping: the human element. , 2006, Journal of safety research.

[28]  Andrew S McIntosh,et al.  Understanding the human factors contribution to railway accidents and incidents in Australia. , 2008, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[29]  M. Barnett Searching for the root causes of maritime casualties , 2005 .

[30]  Francisco Piniella Fishermen’s training and use of safety equipment: A case-study of the Artisanal Fleet of Andalusia , 2007 .

[31]  O. Svenson,et al.  Accident and Incident Analysis Based on the Accident Evolution and Barrier Function ( AEB) Model , 2001, Cognition, Technology & Work.

[32]  D. Vaughan Theorizing Disaster , 2004 .

[33]  Jean-Christophe Le Coze Accident in a French dynamite factory: An example of an organisational investigation , 2010 .

[34]  E. Hollnagel,et al.  The context and habits of accident investigation practices: A study of 108 Swedish investigators , 2010 .