Microfluidics on liquid handling stations (μF-on-LHS): an industry compatible chip interface between microfluidics and automated liquid handling stations.

We describe a generic microfluidic interface design that allows the connection of microfluidic chips to established industrial liquid handling stations (LHS). A molding tool has been designed that allows fabrication of low-cost disposable polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) chips with interfaces that provide convenient and reversible connection of the microfluidic chip to industrial LHS. The concept allows complete freedom of design for the microfluidic chip itself. In this setup all peripheral fluidic components (such as valves and pumps) usually required for microfluidic experiments are provided by the LHS. Experiments (including readout) can be carried out fully automated using the hardware and software provided by LHS manufacturer. Our approach uses a chip interface that is compatible with widely used and industrially established LHS which is a significant advancement towards near-industrial experimental design in microfluidics and will greatly facilitate the acceptance and translation of microfluidics technology in industry.

[1]  Claude Sauter,et al.  From Macrofluidics to Microfluidics for the Crystallization of Biological Macromolecules , 2007 .

[2]  Roland Zengerle,et al.  Microfluidic platforms for lab-on-a-chip applications. , 2007, Lab on a chip.

[3]  Bastian E. Rapp,et al.  Let there be chip—towards rapid prototyping of microfluidic devices: one-step manufacturing processes , 2011 .

[4]  Shufang Zhang,et al.  A robust high-throughput sandwich cell-based drug screening platform. , 2011, Biomaterials.

[5]  Holger Becker,et al.  One size fits all? , 2010, Lab on a chip.

[6]  Frédéric Reymond,et al.  GRAVI: Robotized Microfluidics for Fast and Automated Immunoassays in Low Volume , 2008 .

[7]  D. Hafeman,et al.  Multichannel pipettor performance verified by measuring pathlength of reagent dispensed into a microplate. , 1998, Analytical biochemistry.

[8]  D. Beebe,et al.  PDMS bonding by means of a portable, low-cost corona system. , 2006, Lab on a chip.

[9]  S. Sundararajan,et al.  Addressable nanowell arrays formed using reversibly sealable hybrid elastomer-metal stencils. , 2010, Analytical chemistry.

[10]  Lutz Riegger,et al.  Lab-on-a-chip solutions designed for being operated on standard laboratory instruments , 2010 .

[11]  B. Rupp,et al.  Laboratory scale structural genomics , 2004, Journal of Structural and Functional Genomics.

[12]  Jin-Woo Choi,et al.  A novel in-plane passive microfluidic mixer with modified Tesla structures. , 2004, Lab on a chip.

[13]  Shuichi Takayama,et al.  Micro-ring structures stabilize microdroplets to enable long term spheroid culture in 384 hanging drop array plates , 2011, Biomedical Microdevices.

[14]  G. Whitesides,et al.  Rapid Prototyping of Microfluidic Systems in Poly(dimethylsiloxane). , 1998, Analytical chemistry.

[15]  G. Whitesides The origins and the future of microfluidics , 2006, Nature.

[16]  Matthew A Cooper,et al.  Direct quantification of analyte concentration by resonant acoustic profiling. , 2005, Clinical chemistry.

[17]  David J Beebe,et al.  An adaptable hydrogel array format for 3-dimensional cell culture and analysis. , 2008, Biomaterials.

[18]  David J Beebe,et al.  Automated cell culture in high density tubeless microfluidic device arrays. , 2008, Lab on a chip.

[19]  K. Jensen,et al.  Cells on chips , 2006, Nature.

[20]  Shuichi Takayama,et al.  384 hanging drop arrays give excellent Z‐factors and allow versatile formation of co‐culture spheroids , 2012, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[21]  Kaari L Linask,et al.  High-throughput mouse genotyping using robotics automation. , 2005, BioTechniques.