Screening for diabetes: hope and despair

This commentary discusses whether screening for type 2 diabetes or earlier normalisation of blood glucose levels or initiation of non-antihyperglycaemic agents or any other diabetes-specific treatment can help reduce the excess associated risks for macrovascular morbidity and mortality. The available data indicate that screening with the sole aim of decreasing the lead time between diagnosis and treatment is very unlikely to reduce these risks. In contrast to macrovascular complications, some microvascular events such as background retinopathy could theoretically be prevented by earlier diagnosis and better glycaemic control, particularly in relatively young type 2 diabetic patients. This, however, remains to be shown in controlled prospective intervention trials.

[1]  K. Khunti,et al.  Prevention of Type 2 diabetes mellitus. A review of the evidence and its application in a UK setting , 2004, Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association.

[2]  Neil Chapman,et al.  Effects of different blood pressure-lowering regimens on major cardiovascular events in individuals with and without diabetes mellitus: results of prospectively designed overviews of randomized trials. , 2005, Archives of internal medicine.

[3]  A Toby Prevost,et al.  Screening for type 2 diabetes is feasible, acceptable, but associated with increased short-term anxiety: A randomised controlled trial in British general practice , 2008, BMC public health.

[4]  T. Bishop Clinical knowledge summaries , 2009 .

[5]  L. Bouter,et al.  Prevalence of macrovascular disease amongst type 2 diabetic patients detected by targeted screening and patients newly diagnosed in general practice: the Hoorn Screening Study , 2004, Journal of internal medicine.

[6]  G. Reaven,et al.  Effect of Metformin on Carbohydrate and Lipoprotein Metabolism in NIDDM Patients , 1990, Diabetes Care.

[7]  A. Vaag,et al.  Intensive glycaemic control for patients with type 2 diabetes: systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of randomised clinical trials , 2011, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[8]  C. McCabe,et al.  Evaluation of a diabetic foot screening and protection programme , 1998, Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association.

[9]  F. Snoek,et al.  The psychological impact of screening for type 2 diabetes , 2006, Diabetes/metabolism research and reviews.

[10]  N. Wareham,et al.  How much does screening bring forward the diagnosis of type 2 diabetes and reduce complications? Twelve year follow-up of the Ely cohort , 2012, Diabetologia.

[11]  R. Holman,et al.  Association of glycaemia with macrovascular and microvascular complications of type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 35): prospective observational study , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[12]  R. Lyra,et al.  [Prevention of type 2 diabetes mellitus]. , 2006, Arquivos brasileiros de endocrinologia e metabologia.

[13]  N. J. Wareham,et al.  Effect of population screening for type 2 diabetes on mortality: long-term follow-up of the Ely cohort , 2011, Diabetologia.

[14]  Cholesterol Treatment Trialists' Collaborators Efficacy of cholesterol-lowering therapy in 18 686 people with diabetes in 14 randomised trials of statins: a meta-analysis , 2008, The Lancet.

[15]  R. Klein,et al.  Onset of NIDDM occurs at Least 4–7 yr Before Clinical Diagnosis , 1992, Diabetes Care.

[16]  K. Lipska,et al.  Hard end points are needed for intensive glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes , 2012, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[17]  B. Neal The Blood Pressure Lowering Treatment Trialists' Collaboration , 2001 .

[18]  Beverley Balkau,et al.  High Blood Glucose Concentration Is a Risk Factor for Mortality in Middle-Aged Nondiabetic Men: 20-year follow-up in the Whitehall Study, the Paris Prospective Study, and the Helsinki Policemen Study , 1998, Diabetes Care.

[19]  Kevin A Peterson,et al.  Effects of Intensive Blood-Pressure Control in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus , 2011 .

[20]  J. Yudkin,et al.  Intensified glucose lowering in type 2 diabetes: time for a reappraisal , 2010, Diabetologia.

[21]  Kamlesh Khunti,et al.  Effect of early intensive multifactorial therapy on 5-year cardiovascular outcomes in individuals with type 2 diabetes detected by screening (ADDITION-Europe): a cluster-randomised trial , 2011, The Lancet.

[22]  S. Sutton,et al.  Psychological impact of screening for type 2 diabetes: controlled trial and comparative study embedded in the ADDITION (Cambridge) randomised controlled trial , 2007, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[23]  N. Wareham,et al.  The ADDITION-Cambridge trial protocol: a cluster – randomised controlled trial of screening for type 2 diabetes and intensive treatment for screen-detected patients , 2009, BMC public health.

[24]  S. Wild,et al.  Global prevalence of diabetes: estimates for the year 2000 and projections for 2030. , 2004, Diabetes care.

[25]  R. Stolk,et al.  Three years follow-up of screen-detected diabetic and non-diabetic subjects: who is better off? The ADDITION Netherlands study. , 2008, BMC family practice.

[26]  S. Sutton,et al.  Are people with negative diabetes screening tests falsely reassured? Parallel group cohort study embedded in the ADDITION (Cambridge) randomised controlled trial , 2009, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[27]  G. Tognoni,et al.  Aspirin for primary prevention of cardiovascular events in people with diabetes: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials , 2009, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[28]  G. Nijpels,et al.  No substantial psychological impact of the diagnosis of Type 2 diabetes following targeted population screening: The Hoorn Screening Study , 2004, Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association.