Uniformity of visual acuity measures in published studies.

PURPOSE To investigate the methods used in contemporary ophthalmic literature to designate visual acuity (VA). METHODS Papers in all 2005 editions of five ophthalmic journals were considered. Papers were included if (1) VA, vision, or visual function was mentioned in the abstract and (2) if the study involved age-related macular degeneration, cataract, or refractive surgery. If a paper was selected on the basis of its abstract, the full text of the paper was examined for information on the method of refractive correction during VA testing, type of chart used to measure VA, specifics concerning chart features, testing protocols, and data analysis and means of expressing VA in results. RESULTS One hundred twenty-eight papers were included. The most common type of charts used were described as logMAR-based. Although most (89.8%) of the studies reported on the method of refractive correction during VA testing, only 58.6% gave the chart design, and less than 12% gave any information whatsoever on chart features or measurement procedures used. CONCLUSIONS The methods used and the approach to analysis were rarely described in sufficient detail to allow others to replicate the study being reported. Sufficient detail should be given on VA measurement to enable others to duplicate the research. The authors suggest that charts adhering to Bailey-Lovie design principles always be used to measure vision in prospective studies and their use encouraged in clinical settings. The distinction between the terms logMAR, an acuity notation, and Bailey-Lovie or ETDRS as chart types should be adhered to more strictly.

[1]  William M. Lyle,et al.  Borish???s Clinical Refraction , 1999 .

[2]  Bennett Ag.  Ophthalmic test types. A review of previous work and discussions on some controversial questions. , 1965 .

[3]  R. Klein,et al.  Cataract and barriers to cataract surgery in a US Hispanic population: Proyecto VER. , 2005, Archives of ophthalmology.

[4]  G. Westheimer.  Updating the classical approach to visual acuity , 2001, Clinical & experimental optometry.

[5]  H. Snellen,et al.  Art. XXIV.—Test-Types for the Determination of the Acuteness of Vision. , 1863 .

[6]  A. G. Bennett,et al.  Ophthalmic test types. A review of previous work and discussions on some controversial questions. , 1965, The British journal of physiological optics.

[7]  M. Bullimore,et al.  Consistency between visual acuity scores obtained at different test distances. , 2004, Archives of ophthalmology.

[8]  Christoph Kniestedt,et al.  Visual acuity and its measurement. , 2003, Ophthalmology clinics of North America.

[9]  D Whitaker,et al.  Reliability of the Snellen chart , 1995, BMJ.

[10]  H. Snellen.  Letterproeven, tot bepaling der gezigtsscherpte , 1862 .

[11]  M. Camparini,et al.  ETDRS-fast: implementing psychophysical adaptive methods to standardized visual acuity measurement with ETDRS charts. , 2001, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[12]  V. Dreyer,et al.  Visual acuity. , 1974, Ophthalmologica. Journal international d'ophtalmologie. International journal of ophthalmology. Zeitschrift fur Augenheilkunde.

[13]  S. Sandramouli,et al.  Evidence-based practice in acute ophthalmology , 2007, Eye.

[14]  F L Ferris,et al.  Standardizing the measurement of visual acuity for clinical research studies: Guidelines from the Eye Care Technology Forum. , 1996, Ophthalmology.

[15]  N. Bressler.  Photodynamic therapy of subfoveal choroidal neovascularization in age-related macular degeneration with verteporfin: two-year results of 2 randomized clinical trials-tap report 2. , 2001 .

[16]  A. J. Jackson,et al.  Change of Visual Acuity Recording Methods in Clinical Studies across the Years , 2008, Ophthalmologica.

[17]  D. Diloreto,et al.  Use of best and final visual acuity outcomes in ophthalmological research , 2004 .

[18]  A Carkeet,et al.  Modeling logMAR Visual Acuity Scores: Effects of Termination Rules and Alternative Forced-Choice Options , 2001, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[19]  N. Bressler,et al.  Photodynamic therapy of subfoveal choroidal neovascularization in age-related macular degeneration with verteporfin: one-year results of 2 randomized clinical trials--TAP report. Treatment of age-related macular degeneration with photodynamic therapy (TAP) Study Group. , 1999, Archives of ophthalmology.

[20]  William J. Benjamin,et al.  Borish's clinical refraction , 1998 .

[21]  J Green,et al.  On a New Series of Test-Letters for determining the Acuteness of Vision. , 1868, Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society.

[22]  B. Hawkins,et al.  Consistency between visual acuity scores obtained at different test distances: theory vs observations in multiple studies. , 2002, Archives of ophthalmology.

[23]  Fred W Fitzke,et al.  How sensitive to clinical change are ETDRS logMAR visual acuity measurements? , 2003, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[24]  J. Holladay,et al.  Visual acuity measurements. , 2004, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[25]  A prospective randomized clinical trial of laser in situ keratomileusis with two different lasers. , 2005, American journal of ophthalmology.

[26]  J. McCulley,et al.  Hyperopic laser in situ keratomileusis in eyes with previous radial keratotomy , 2005, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[27]  I L Bailey,et al.  New Design Principles for Visual Acuity Letter Charts* , 1976, American journal of optometry and physiological optics.

[28]  B. Hawkins,et al.  Measurement and analysis of visual acuity in multicenter randomized clinical trials in the United States: Findings from a survey , 2003, Ophthalmic epidemiology.

[29]  V. Dreyer.  ON THE EXACTNESS OF VISUAL ACUITY DETERMINATION CHARTS WITH DECIMAL, SNELLEN, AND LOGARITHMIC NOTATION , 1964, Acta ophthalmologica.

[30]  F. Ferris,et al.  New visual acuity charts for clinical research. , 1982, American journal of ophthalmology.

[31]  S. Sacu,et al.  Association between intensity of posterior capsule opacification and visual acuity , 2005, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.