Geo-environmental Aspects of European Underground Infrastructure

Underground excavation techniques have become safer, cheaper and faster. Governments of European countries and certain industrial sectors have shown to be prepared to make long-term investments in finding environmentally friendly solutions to resolve infrastructural problems in urban areas resulting from economic growth and increased urbanisation. These two developments have been responsible for a significant increase in European underground infrastructure in the past three decades. An even more spectacular growth can be witnessed in China since 2000. In this paper the use of the subsurface is described against a geological and geotechnical background. In addition, due attention is given to legislation related to underground development. Current legislation in EU countries and beyond is far from adequate to resolve legal issues concerning subsurface structures. In this paper legislation relevant to environmental aspects of subsurface infrastructural elements, and the apparent lack of proper legislative frameworks in this field at national and supra-national (EU) levels, is highlighted. As most indicators point to a more intensive use of the subsurface over the next few decades, geological and legislative constraints will become more and more decisive factors in enabling its optimal use.

[1]  Song Yuan,et al.  Investigation and assessment on mountain tunnels and geotechnical damage after the Wenchuan earthquake , 2009 .

[2]  Bjørn Lomborg,et al.  The Bjørn-again economist The Skeptical Environmentalist. Measuring The Real State of The World , 2001 .

[3]  Xiaoqiang Chen,et al.  Evaluation of the Status Quo and outlook of the urban underground space development and utilization in China , 2007 .

[4]  H.R.G.K. Hack,et al.  Sustainable Development and Management of the Shallow Subsurface , 2012 .

[5]  Patrick J. O'keefe,et al.  The European Convention on the Protection of the Archaeological Heritage , 1993, Antiquity.

[6]  P.J.M. van Oosterom,et al.  Conceptual 3D Cadastral Model Applied in Several Countries , 2004 .

[7]  D. V. Griffiths,et al.  Risk Assessment in Geotechnical Engineering , 2008 .

[8]  Junji Nishi,et al.  The Underground Images in Japan, Korea and Indonesia , 2007 .

[9]  Ray Sterling,et al.  RISK BUDGET MANAGEMENT IN PROGRESSING UNDERGROUND WORKS. INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR TRENCHLESS TECHNOLOGY (ISTT) AND INTERNATIONAL TUNNELLING ASSOCIATION (ITA) JOINT WORKING GROUP REPORT , 2003 .

[10]  J. Halamić.  Geochemical Atlas of Europe , 2006 .

[11]  Yoshimi Ohta,et al.  Response and Stability of Underground Structures in Rock Mass during Earthquakes , 2010 .

[12]  Eui-Seob Park,et al.  The Current Status of Underground Space Utilization in Korea , 2007 .

[13]  A. Keith Turner,et al.  New paradigms in subsurface prediction : characterization of the shallow subsurface implications for urban infrastructure and environmental assessment , 2003 .

[14]  Robert Hack,et al.  3D modelling system for ground engineering , 2003 .

[15]  Robert Hack,et al.  Three and more dimensional modelling in geo-engineering , 2006 .

[16]  Michael Barker,et al.  Using the earth to save energy: Four underground buildings , 1986 .

[17]  P. A. Cross,et al.  Lecture notes in Earth sciences: Vol. 12. S. Turner (Editor), Applied Geodesy VIII, Springer, Berlin, F.R.G., 1987, 393pp, DM78.00, ISBN 3 540 182195 , 1989 .