Numerical and analytical study of seismic response of structural systems with new formulation using energy and impact methods

This paper presents two simple and robust technique for response estimating of single-degree-of-freedom (SDOF) structural systems. The impulse method, because it is formulated based on the fundamentals of dynamics; especially, the linear impulse concept, and also the energy method, because the main idea of this method is inspired by energy conservation principles. These methods can strongly cope with linear damped systems for which damping ratio ζ is greater than 0.01. Assessment of SDOF dynamic systems under any arbitrary excitations is easily possible through the proposed methods. There is no error propagation through the solving process. The numerical example reveals the simplicity and robustness of the new technique compared to Duhamel’s integral and similar techniques. Finally, a numerical example is investigated to demonstrate the efficiency of the algorithms. The most famous record of El Centro ground motion is applied to the systems. The obtained results show that the new algorithm works exactly enough to compete with a conventional method such as the Duhamel integration method and the Newmark-β method. A comparison between the results of this method with the solution methods used by other researchers is shown to be a good match.

[1]  M. Géradin,et al.  Mechanical Vibrations: Theory and Application to Structural Dynamics , 1994 .

[2]  W. Thomson Theory of vibration with applications , 1965 .

[3]  Michael Beer,et al.  Fragility analysis of nonproportionally damped inelastic MDOF structural systems exposed to stochastic seismic excitation , 2020, Computers & Structures.

[4]  Haym Benaroya,et al.  Mechanical Vibration: Analysis, Uncertainties, and Control , 1997 .

[5]  Baisheng Wu,et al.  An iteration approach to nonlinear oscillations of conservative single-degree-of-freedom systems , 2004 .

[6]  A S Veletsos,et al.  Deformation Spectra for Elastic and Elastoplastic Systems Subjected to Ground Shock and Earthquake Motions , 1965 .

[7]  Paolo L. Gatti Applied structural and mechanical vibrations : theory and methods , 2014 .

[8]  Monique M. Holt,et al.  Seismic Analysis of the 2020 Magna, Utah, Earthquake Sequence: Evidence for a Listric Wasatch Fault , 2020, Geophysical Research Letters.

[9]  Nathan M. Newmark,et al.  A Method of Computation for Structural Dynamics , 1959 .

[10]  Iman Hajirasouliha,et al.  Seismic reliability analysis and estimation of multilevel response modification factor for steel diagrid structural systems , 2020, Journal of Building Engineering.

[11]  Amin Moslemi Petrudi,et al.  Analytical and Dynamic study of Pulled Mass Nonlinear Vibration by Two Cables using Newton's Harmonic Balance Method , 2020, Technium: Romanian Journal of Applied Sciences and Technology.

[12]  Shuenn-Yih Chang,et al.  Studies of Newmark method for solving nonlinear systems: (I) basic analysis , 2004 .

[13]  Shuenn-Yih Chang,et al.  Studies of Newmark method for solving nonlinear systems: (II) Verification and guideline , 2004 .

[14]  M. Babaei,et al.  A general approach to approximate solutions of nonlinear differential equations using particle swarm optimization , 2013, Appl. Soft Comput..

[15]  Anil K. Chopra,et al.  Statistics of Single-Degree-of-Freedom Estimate of Displacement for Pushover Analysis of Buildings , 2003 .

[17]  Michael Beer,et al.  First-excursion stochastic incremental dynamics methodology for hysteretic structural systems subject to seismic excitation , 2021 .

[18]  Mehmet Çevik,et al.  Polynomial solution of the single degree of freedom system by Taylor matrix method , 2008 .

[19]  Baisheng Wu,et al.  Large amplitude non-linear oscillations of a general conservative system , 2004 .