Rejoinder to the Critiques of the National Mathematics Advisory Panel Final Report
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Joanne Lobato. On Learning Processes and the National Mathematics Advisory Panel Report , 2008 .
[2] J. Bransford,et al. Mathematics Worth Knowing, Resources Worth Growing, Research Worth Noting: A Response to the National Mathematics Advisory Panel Report , 2008 .
[3] A. Collins,et al. Commentary on the Final Report of the National Mathematics Advisory Panel , 2008 .
[4] James P. Spillane. Policy, Politics, and the National Mathematics Advisory Panel Report: Topology, Functions, and Limits , 2008 .
[5] J. Boaler. When Politics Took the Place of Inquiry: A Response to the National Mathematics Advisory Panel’s Review of Instructional Practices , 2008 .
[6] Hilda Borko,et al. Teachers, Teaching, and Teacher Education: Comments on the National Mathematics Advisory Panel’s Report , 2008 .
[7] Paul Cobb,et al. The Consequences of Experimentalism in Formulating Recommendations for Policy and Practice in Mathematics Education , 2008 .
[8] F. Sloane. Randomized Trials in Mathematics Education: Recalibrating the Proposed High Watermark , 2008 .
[9] Lorrie A. Shepard,et al. Commentary on the National Mathematics Advisory Panel Recommendations on Assessment , 2008 .
[10] J. Confrey,et al. Breaching the Conditions for Success for a National Advisory Panel , 2008 .