Clinical Impact of Stump Closure Reinforced With Hemopatch on the Prevention of Clinically Relevant Pancreatic Fistula After Distal Pancreatectomy: A Multicenter Randomized Trial

Introduction: Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) is the most dreaded complication after distal pancreatectomy (DP). This multicenter randomized trial evaluated the efficacy, safety, and tolerance of Hemopatch in preventing clinically relevant (grades B/C according to the ISGPS classification) POPF after DP. Material and methods: After stump closure, patients were randomized to affix Hemopatch to the stump or not. Statistical significance was set at 0.025. Clinical significance was defined as the number of patients needed to treat (NNT) to avoid 1 B/C POPF. Results: Of 631 eligible patients, 360 were randomized and 315 analyzed per protocol (155 in the standard closure group; 160 in the Hemopatch group). The rates of B/C POPF (the primary endpoint) were 23.2% and 16.3% (P = 0.120), while the number of patients with 1 or more complications (including patients with B/C POPF) was 34.8% and 24.4% (P = 0.049) in the standard and Hemopatch groups, respectively. In patients with hand-sewn stump and main duct closure, the rates were 26.2% versus 10.0% (P = 0.014) and 23.3% versus 7.7% (P = 0.015) in the standard and Hemopatch groups, respectively. The NNT in these 2 subgroups was 6 and 6.4, respectively. Conclusion: The results of the first randomized trial evaluating Hemopatch-reinforced pancreatic stump after DP to prevent type B/C POPF do not allow us to conclude that the risk of B/C POPF was lower. Based on the NNT, however, routine use of Hemopatch after DP may result in fewer complications (including POPF) overall, especially in cases with hand-sewn closure of the pancreatic stump or main pancreatic duct. Mini-abstract: This multicenter randomized study evaluated the efficacy, safety, and tolerance of Hemopatch in preventing clinically relevant (types B and C) postoperative pancreatic fistula (B/C POPF) after distal pancreatectomy (DP). Clinical significance was defined as the number of patients needed to treat to avoid 1 POPF. Hemopatch reduced the rate of POPF after DP. Although the difference was statistically significant only in patients with hand-sewn stumps and when the main pancreatic duct was closed, the clinical signification was that routine use after DP would result in fewer complications and less associated costs in these 2 settings.

[1]  C. Nickson,et al.  When Should Clinicians Act on Non-Statistically Significant Results From Clinical Trials? , 2020, JAMA.

[2]  K. Lillemoe,et al.  Management of the pancreatic transection plane after left (distal) pancreatectomy: Expert consensus guidelines by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). , 2020, Surgery.

[3]  J. Windsor,et al.  Network meta‐analysis comparing techniques and outcomes of stump closure after distal pancreatectomy , 2019, The British journal of surgery.

[4]  P. Dolce,et al.  The effectiveness of Hemopatch™ in preventing postoperative distal pancreatectomy fistulas , 2019, Expert review of medical devices.

[5]  A. Sauvanet,et al.  Pancreatic fistula following laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy is probably unrelated to the stapler size but to the drainage modality and significantly decreased with a small suction drain , 2019, Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery.

[6]  G. RamirezManuel,et al.  Cost-Benefit Analysis: Hemopatch® Vs Standard of Care in The Incidence of Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula in a Observational Study , 2019, American Journal of Biomedical Science & Research.

[7]  C. Bassi,et al.  Current Definition of and Controversial Issues Regarding Postoperative Pancreatic Fistulas , 2018, Gut and liver.

[8]  D. Raptis,et al.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of postoperative pancreatic fistula rates using the updated 2016 International Study Group Pancreatic Fistula definition in patients undergoing pancreatic resection with soft and hard pancreatic texture. , 2018, HPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association.

[9]  H. Friess,et al.  Pancreatic stump closure techniques and pancreatic fistula formation after distal pancreatectomy: Meta-analysis and single-center experience , 2018, PloS one.

[10]  K. Lewis,et al.  Clinical effectiveness and versatility of a sealing hemostatic patch (HEMOPATCH) in multiple surgical specialties , 2018, Expert review of medical devices.

[11]  J. Samra,et al.  Postoperative pancreatic fistula: a review of traditional and emerging concepts , 2018, Clinical and experimental gastroenterology.

[12]  C. Bassi,et al.  Defining the practice of distal pancreatectomy around the world. , 2018, HPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association.

[13]  D. Fraker,et al.  Decoding Grade B Pancreatic Fistula: A Clinical and Economical Analysis and Subclassification Proposal. , 2018, Annals of surgery.

[14]  D. Gouma,et al.  The 2016 update of the International Study Group (ISGPS) definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula: 11 Years After , 2017, Surgery.

[15]  Jae Keun Kim,et al.  Effect of Polyglycolic Acid Mesh for Prevention of Pancreatic Fistula Following Distal Pancreatectomy: A Randomized Clinical Trial , 2017, JAMA surgery.

[16]  Jin‐Young Jang,et al.  Optimal stapler cartridge selection according to the thickness of the pancreas in distal pancreatectomy , 2016, Medicine.

[17]  Jae Keun Kim,et al.  Use of TachoSil® patches to prevent pancreatic leaks after distal pancreatectomy: a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled study , 2016, Journal of hepato-biliary-pancreatic sciences.

[18]  A. Sauvanet,et al.  Stump closure reinforcement with absorbable fibrin collagen sealant sponge (TachoSil) does not prevent pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatectomy: the FIABLE multicenter controlled randomized study. , 2015, American journal of surgery.

[19]  C. Ko,et al.  Postoperative Complications Reduce Adjuvant Chemotherapy Use in Resectable Pancreatic Cancer , 2014, Annals of surgery.

[20]  H. Yamaue,et al.  Stump closure of a thick pancreas using stapler closure increases pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatectomy. , 2013, American journal of surgery.

[21]  C. Bassi,et al.  Efficacy of an Absorbable Fibrin Sealant Patch (TachoSil) After Distal Pancreatectomy: A Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Trial , 2012, Annals of surgery.

[22]  M. Porembka,et al.  Mesh Reinforcement of Pancreatic Transection Decreases Incidence of Pancreatic Occlusion Failure for Left Pancreatectomy: A Single-Blinded, Randomized Controlled Trial , 2012, Annals of surgery.

[23]  J. Kleeff,et al.  Efficacy of stapler versus hand-sewn closure after distal pancreatectomy (DISPACT): a randomised, controlled multicentre trial , 2011, The Lancet.

[24]  C. Bassi,et al.  Early Versus Late Drain Removal After Standard Pancreatic Resections: Results of a Prospective Randomized Trial , 2010, Annals of surgery.

[25]  Sally Hopewell,et al.  Publication bias in clinical trials due to statistical significance or direction of trial results. , 2009, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[26]  J. Ioannidis,et al.  Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias , 2008, PloS one.

[27]  Luisangel Rondon,et al.  Laparoscopic resection of the pancreatic tail with splenic preservation. , 2006, American journal of surgery.

[28]  J. Kassirer Conflicts of Interest: Financial and Otherwise , 2005 .

[29]  J. Neoptolemos,et al.  Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. , 2005, Surgery.

[30]  D. Sackett,et al.  The number needed to treat: a clinically useful measure of treatment effect , 1995, BMJ.

[31]  A. Warshaw Conservation of the spleen with distal pancreatectomy. , 1988, Archives of surgery.

[32]  Nathan Mantel,et al.  Chi-square tests with one degree of freedom , 1963 .

[33]  Jae Keun Kim,et al.  Use of TachoSil ® patches to prevent pancreatic leaks after distal pancreatectomy : a prospective , multicenter , randomized controlled study , 2016 .

[34]  M. Makuuchi,et al.  The Clavien-Dindo Classification of Surgical Complications: Five-Year Experience , 2009, Annals of surgery.