Are secondary school students still hampered by the natural number bias? A reaction time study on fraction comparison tasks

Rational numbers and particularly fractions are difficult for students. It is often claimed that the ‘natural number bias’ underlies erroneous reasoning about rational numbers. This cross-sectional study investigated the natural number bias in first and fifth year secondary school students. Relying on dual process theory assumptions that differentiate between intuitive and analytic processes, we measured accuracies and reaction times on fraction comparison tasks. Half of the items were congruent (i.e., natural number knowledge leads to correct answers), the other half were incongruent (i.e., natural number knowledge leads to incorrect answers). Against expectations, students hardly made errors on incongruent items. Longer reaction times on correctly solved incongruent than on correctly solved congruent items indicated that students were indeed hampered by their prior knowledge about natural numbers, but could suppress their intuitive answers.

[1]  Ruth Stavy,et al.  How Students Mis/Understand Science and Mathematics: Intuitive Rules (Ways of Knowing in Science Series) , 2000 .

[2]  S. Zeger,et al.  Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models , 1986 .

[3]  Timothy D. Wilson,et al.  Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. , 1977 .

[4]  S. Sloman.  The empirical case for two systems of reasoning. , 1996 .

[5]  Yujing Ni,et al.  Teaching and Learning Fraction and Rational Numbers: The Origins and Implications of Whole Number Bias , 2005 .

[6]  Lieven Verschaffel,et al.  Naturally Biased? In Search for Reaction Time Evidence for a Natural Number Bias in Adults. , 2012 .

[7]  Jonathan Evans,et al.  Rationality and reasoning , 1996 .

[8]  Jacques Grégoire,et al.  Developmental changes in the comparison of decimal fractions , 2010 .

[9]  Klaus Hasemann.  On difficulties with fractions , 1981 .

[10]  Stella Vosniadou,et al.  The Whole Number Bias in Fraction Magnitude Comparisons with Adults , 2011, CogSci.

[11]  S. Vosniadou,et al.  How Many Decimals Are There Between Two Fractions? Aspects of Secondary School Students’ Understanding of Rational Numbers and Their Notation , 2010 .

[12]  Ruth Stavy,et al.  Intuitive rules in science and mathematics: a reaction time study , 2006 .

[13]  S. Vosniadou,et al.  The development of students’ understanding of the numerical value of fractions , 2004 .

[14]  W. Neys,et al.  Feeling we’re biased: Autonomic arousal and reasoning conflict , 2010, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[15]  S. Vosniadou.  Capturing and modeling the process of conceptual change. , 1994 .

[16]  K. A. Ericsson,et al.  Protocol Analysis: Verbal Reports as Data , 1984 .

[17]  ROBERT S. MOYER,et al.  Time required for Judgements of Numerical Inequality , 1967, Nature.

[18]  L. Verschaffel,et al.  Dual Processes in the Psychology of Mathematics Education and Cognitive Psychology , 2009, Human Development.

[19]  S. Epstein.  Integration of the cognitive and the psychodynamic unconscious. , 1994, The American psychologist.

[20]  Uri Leron,et al.  Intuitive vs analytical thinking: four perspectives , 2009, The Best Writing on Mathematics 2010.

[21]  Wim De Neys,et al.  Automatic-heuristic and executive-analytic processing during reasoning: Chronometric and dual-task considerations. , 2006 .

[22]  Marie-Pascale Noël,et al.  Comparing the magnitude of two fractions with common components: which representations are used by 10- and 12-year-olds? , 2010, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[23]  Marie-Pascale Noël,et al.  Comparing 5/7 and 2/9: Adults can do it by accessing the magnitude of the whole fractions. , 2010, Acta psychologica.

[24]  Luis Rico Romero,et al.  Intuition in Science and Mathematics: an educational approach , 1988 .